Austin's I-35 ranks 4th most congested freeway in U.S.

Link to article here.

The way this report was compiled has some flaws…they selected a congested roadway in major U.S. cities and then ranked the entire city based on its single most congested corridor. But it is useful in illustrating the persistent troubles with I-35 through Austin. The SH 130 tollway was built to supposedly relieve I-35 traffic and to get trucks off I-35. It’s a total flop!

We’re all still sitting in gridlock on I-35. Why? Because few can afford to use the tollway. The SH 130 toll road is so empty during rush hour a distressed plane used it as a runway! SH 130 is heavily subsidized with heaps of taxpayer money by those who don’t even drive on it. If they really want to relieve I-35 traffic, make SH 130 a FREE road that truckers and motorists alike can afford to take, and we would likely see appreciable relief on I-35. Tolling alternative roadways is a BIG LOSER in actually solving traffic congestion woes! They amount to roads for the wealthy, not the general public, yet it’s still using the taxpayers’ dime.

Austin ranked 4th worst traffic in U.S.

Austin Business Journal

Austin’s I-35 corridor has the fourth worst peak-hour congestion in the United States, according to research from INRIX and The Daily Beast today.

The traffic research companies based the rankings on peak road travel time compared with during free-flow hours, and the report identified roadways with the longest hours of bottleneck congestion.

The report found on average I-35 drivers encounter 460 hours of bottleneck traffic a week. The worst congestion heads northbound for about a mile near Riverside Drive and at its slowest hits about 16 mph.

Houston’s Loop 610 was ranked 12th worst traffic with an average 189 hours of congestion a week and Loop 820 in Dallas clocked in 172 hours and was listed 15th. San Antonio came in much lower on the list with just 71 hours of traffic a week on Loop 410.

The Hollywood Freeway in Los Angeles topped the list, followed by the Lunalilo Freeway of Honolulu. The Capital Beltway came in third and U.S. 101 in San Francisco fell behind Austin. Seattle; Bridgeport, Conn; Chicago, Ill.; and Miami also made the top 10 list.

The complete list of 75 cities is available here.

Farouk Shami proposes transportation overhaul without tolls, privatization

Farouk Shami Proposes Overhaul in Transportation Policy

Texas Insider – January 20, 2010, On The Record

We must stop the Trans Texas Corridor and Eminent Domain Abuses

HOUSTON- Farouk Shami released his campaign’s policy on transportation issues Thursday. Transportation issues are one the greatest challenges facing the State of Texas. Every hour spent stuck in traffic is an hour of time robbed from Texans. Continue Reading →

Texans battle privatization of Texas roads

Link to article here.

Elite’s Toll Road Scheme
The Big Picture/with Mark Anderson,American Free Press deputy editor, www.AmericanFreePress.net; and host of RBN’s When Worlds Collide, broadcast Saturdays from 7 to 9 p.m. Central; Call in, 800-313-9443.

Posted: January 15, 2010

Outraged Texans are coming out swinging in early 2010, continuing the brutal fight against the outright privatization of public highways — trying to avoid getting steamrolled by Wall Street “highwaymen” and their political allies who would deprive Texans and all Americans of the ownership and cost-effective use of highways already paid for with gasoline taxes.

Watching a state like Texas tells a great deal about what could happen anywhere. So, AMERICAN FREE PRESS has been monitoring the Texas situation for more than three years, as the drama plays out on whether the Trans-Texas Corridor – a pivotal piece of the proposed NAFTA Superhighway system for engineering the physical aspects of the North American Union scheme – will be built to any irreversible extent; and whether existing freeways will be converted to toll ways in a privatization scheme to cancel any competition that freeways would pose to aggressive plans to toll any highway with enough traffic for manipulators to make money.

These financial sharks tempt the cash-strapped states with quick money by acquiring freeways from them and transforming them into for-profit toll ways. Or sometimes state-controlled toll ways are privatized under long lease agreements, as happened with the Indiana Toll Road. Tolls of 75 cents a mile are a distinct possibility in places such as Dallas-Fort Worth, an area whose destiny appears to be the U.S. “toll” capital.

The usual suspects will leave no road un-tolled here — and abroad — if we let them get their way. Yes, Goldman-Sachs is creating a “highway market” to control. Meanwhile, the Rothschilds are reportedly among the major financial forces privatizing the roads in Britain.

The domestic scene’s latest developments included a Jan. 11 final public hearing in Texas on a plan to charge tolls on the northbound lanes in San Antonio’s large 281/1604 Interchange. San Antonio Toll Party (SATP) members turned out to protest the plan.

Their main concerns were noted in a news bulletin:

“They’re charging us the price of a whole interchange ($143 million), but we’re only getting half ….Each set of ramps costs roughly $59 million, yet the [Regional Mobility Authority] is putting this project out to bid with $84 million in ‘project enhancements’ in order to use-up all our stimulus money on anything but fixing 281 North or building the whole interchange toll-free.”

From there, the SATP meets Jan. 21 at the Big ’Z Burger Joint in San Antonio at 2303 North 1604 W — mainly to prepare for a major hearing of the Senate Transportation Committee on Feb. 1 in the capital of Austin.  AFP plans to attend.

SATP’s news bulletin on the hearing notes: “Our attention turns to accountability at the ballot box, producing our Voter Guide, preparing for a big grassroots turnout at [the] hearing in Austin on Feb 1 …. Come be a part of preserving our freedom to travel.”

Those in AFP’s growing Texas readership take note: This Austin meeting, to take place at 8 a.m. at the Capitol Extension Auditorium, will focus on statewide road funding alternatives.

“If you want to end tolling as the primary means to fund new roads and for the most affordable method of funding roads to prevail [the common use of gas taxes for maintenance, repairs and needed expansions] you must come to Austin … to be heard,” the SATP also announced. “That means telling lawmakers ‘no’ to selling our roads to private, foreign corporations [Spanish firms under Comprehensive Development Agreements]; ‘no’ to raiding teacher retirement funds and public employee retirement funds to finance them; ‘no’ to any tax increases until they clean house at TxDOT; and stop raiding the gas tax for things that don’t relate to roads; and ‘yes’ to the most affordable way to fund roads (the statewide gas tax that hasn’t been raised since 1991).”

To give an idea of what these toll schemes mean to the average motorist no matter where they’re enacted, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram on Dec. 27 noted:  “Tolls could go as high as 75 cents per mile when congestion is at its worst. That could be more than five times higher than the average 14.5 cents per mile that motorists currently pay on Dallas-area toll roads.”

It’s a concept called “value pricing” in which the “value” all goes one direction — into the fat cats’ pockets.

Building a toll road that you are forced to use has the same effect as paying a higher tax on gasoline. Whether a highway is free, or you are tolled, you still pay 38.4 cents in federal and state gasoline taxes. That is the baseline. Assuming that your vehicle averages 20 miles per gallon, if you drive 20 miles on a toll road charging the maximum 75 cents per mile, you pay your 38.4 cents in current gas taxes plus another $15 in tolls. Thus, the combined tolls and taxes to drive on that road total $15.38 per gallon of gasoline. And to think Americans griped when gas was $4 a gallon.

Yet, the ultimate problem is that more toll ways in any state will create a vast “highway market” [read: racket] by privatizing all major public roads so the NAFTA Superhighway, in Texas and beyond, can be waiting in the wings as a major blow against territorial sovereignty. It also is a surefire way to further impoverish the masses who already had what should be a publicly-controlled asset – the creation of money itself – taken away from them starting in 1913 when the Federal Reserve was born.

Now, roads – which, like money, are used by nearly everybody on a daily basis – may be the final frontier for the elite monopolists whose tentacles pull at the grassroots and span the globe.

Carona: 10 cent gas tax increase would meet all needs without tolls

Link to article here.

Key quotes from Senate Transportation Committee Chairman John Carona from the story below:

Carona said a 20-cent-per-gallon gasoline tax approved 19 years ago no longer covers Texas transportation requirements. The state senator said he believes Texas has resorted to too many toll roads, which he claims cost citizens more in the long run.

“It’s not a good public policy,” he said. “I would argue continued advancement toward more toll roads is bad for Texas.”

Carona said raising the gas tax by 10 cents per gallon could pay for all the unfunded transportation needs, but Carona has found that option has found that option extremely unpopular among state lawmakers.

Mileage Meters? Texans Could Get Taxed By the Mile
By Ken Kalthoff
NBCDFW.com
Fri., Jan. 15, 2010

A tax on the miles you drive could be a way to pay for Texas roads in the future.

Texas transportation planners are studying the idea of a “mileage meter” to help raise money.

Cars built after 1999 have a computer port that can access many types of data about the vehicle.

Progressive Insurance already offers a device that connects to that port for pay as you go rates.

“Mileage does have a lot to do with it,” said Mike Leonard, a Progressive insurance agent in Carrollton. “The less the miles, the less exposure Progressive has. So therefore, they’re willing to give you a discount on your rates.”

The Texas Department of Transportation is investigating whether such a device might also be used to tax drivers for how much they use roads.

“I’m not ready to embrace that technology, but it is a technology we may have to look at,” said State Sen. John Carona, of Dallas, a Republican.

Carona said Texas has an estimated $100 billion worth of unfunded transportation needs.

“The money simply does not exist, and if people are being honest with constituents, they come out and just tell them that,” he said. “We don’t have the money in Austin, and there isn’t the ability locally to raise this money to be able to solve these problems.”

Carona said a 20-cent-per-gallon gasoline tax approved 19 years ago no longer covers Texas transportation requirements. The state senator said he believes Texas has resorted to too many toll roads, which he claims cost citizens more in the long run.

“It’s not a good public policy,” he said. “I would argue continued advancement toward more toll roads is bad for Texas.

Another pay-as-you-go plan might require drivers to electronically record their mileage at the gas pump, which is already required by for some private company cars.

Carona said raising the gas tax by 10 cents per gallon could pay for all the unfunded transportation needs, but Carona has found that option has found that option extremely unpopular among state lawmakers.

One way or another, all of the options require citizens to pay more to solve Texas transportation needs.

“We are substantially behind the times in dealing with this,” Carona said. “We’re going to face substantially greater congestion and air quality issues.”

Perry hammered over toll roads in first gubernatorial debate

Vote for who YOU think won last night’s Republican Gubernatorial debate here.

In the first Texas Republican gubernatorial debate last night, Rick Perry self-destructed. He took a beating from his two opponents and was completely unprepared for meaningful policy discussion. He showed NO VISION for what he plans to do for the next 4 years and simply repeated what one viewer called a “recorded message” that “Texas is great” about 2 dozen times, acting more like a yell leader than an experienced policy maker.

When your opponents point out multiple failings of your administration as well as one’s untruthfulness, like the number of jobs lost on Perry’s watch and proving his claim of cutting taxes and spending were false, he gave no answers other than Texas is great.
Both Kay Bailey Hutchison and Debra Medina slammed Perry for his mismanagement of TxDOT, particularly its $1.1 billion “accounting error” for which no one was fired, the Trans Texas Corridor, and his veto of the strongest eminent domain bill to pass the legislature.

But Hutchison made transportation and Perry’s push for unwanted toll roads front and center and right off the bat said one of the federal programs she’d pull Texas out of is the federal highway program that has shorted Texas it’s fair share habitually since its inception. Hutchison brought Texas up from getting back 76 cents of every gas tax dollar sent to D.C. to 92 cents, but she says that’s still not enough.

She emphasized that she doesn’t want tolls all over Texas in her closing statement. Though her transportation plan released a few weeks ago would reduce the number of toll roads hitting Texas, make strides in reforming TxDOT, and would require a public vote on toll projects, she still supports managed lane projects that toll portions of existing right of way (though not tolling existing lanes) as well as controversial public private partnerships that sell our Texas highways to foreign companies. Two areas that make her vulnerable to Medina, who many at a debate watching event in San Antonio feel ran away with the debate and demonstrated she’s a force to be reckoned with.

The real self-destruct moments came when Perry couldn’t make a cogent defense of his veto of the eminent domain bill and when he claimed ignorance to a controversial end of life bill that passed while he presided over the senate that mandates medical personal pull the plug on patients who are still conscious and whose families still want to pay for care. The audience member who asked the question said it’s the worst end of life law in the country. Perry’s strongest supporters to date have been from the pro-life community, and Perry not only allowed the bill to come through the senate when he as the senate’s presiding officer had the power to stop it, he failed to repeal or address it in 9 years as Governor. This could really hurt Perry with his base.

Voices raised during 3-way GOP debate
By R.G. Ratcliffe and Peggy Fikac – Express-News
Web Posted: 01/14/2010

DENTON – Gov. Rick Perry and U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison clashed repeatedly in the first Republican gubernatorial debate, speaking over one another and all but calling the other a liar.

Activist Debra Medina pushed for a place apart, describing Perry and Hutchison as politicians who embrace big government solutions to Texas’ problems.

After one overlapping exchange of sniping between Hutchison and Perry, Medina expressed frustration, declaring, “This squabbling isn’t getting us anywhere.”

The debate was a key encounter between the candidates leading to the March 2 primary. Only one other debate currently is scheduled for the Republicans.

Perry as the incumbent was the candidate to beat going into the debate, and he repeatedly showed he was willing to take the contest to his two challengers. Hutchison and Medina would not let him back them down.

Hutchison went after Perry’s veracity time and again, while Perry painted Hutchison as out of touch from her years in Washington.

Read the rest of the story here.

Toll authority lobbies to end citizen legal challenges to unwanted toll roads

This excerpt from the story pretty well sums up our thoughts on this obvious attempt to railroad UNWANTED toll projects upon taxpayers by removing genuine legal challenges, the only method they listen to and the only method that has worked so far:

“There’s a reason why they have public comment and review periods,” Hall said. “It is important to give the public a chance to review these things and scrutinize it.”

Some environmental documents are hundreds or thousands of pages long, Hall said, and can’t be digested in 60 days.

“The best way to not have to worry about litigation is not about keeping things out of court — it’s to do the documents right, do right by the public and get community consensus so that there isn’t any opposition.”

Web Posted: 01/14/2010 6:25 CST

Proposal would sideline road-blocking lawsuits

By Josh Baugh – Express-News
Alamo Regional Mobility Authority board member Robert Thompson on Thursday called for a change in federal law that would effectively stop lawsuits that block road projects.

In San Antonio, it would mean swift action in suits filed against toll projects.

Thompson, a lawyer, said he planned to e-mail Bexar County’s congressional delegation after Thursday’s meeting of the agency to seek support for adding such language to federal transportation legislation that Congress is considering. Thompson called lawsuits filed to block highway construction “the bane of so many projects.”

Currently, federal law offers a 180-day window for lawsuits to be filed once an environmental study is approved by the Federal Highway Administration. Thompson’s proposal would cut that to 60 days and require plaintiffs to accept binding arbitration. Resolution would be required within 180 days, Thompson said.

Read the rest of the article here.

Interchange at 281/1604 to cost TWICE as much as it should?

Let’s try to compare apples to apples in order to demonstrate how egregious the fiscal malfeasance is here…

The 410/281 interchange that opened not even two years ago, included ALL 8 ramps (northbound and southbound connectors) for $155 million (see article below from June 2008). Now the 281/1604 interchange project being built by the tolling authority, the RMA, (not TxDOT), wants to blow $140 million on just 4 ramps, only the southbound connectors. Considering project bids have been coming in UNDER cost due to the economic downturn and road builders being hungry for work, this betrayal of the RMA’s fidiciary duty to the public is that much more irresponsible. Why?

So it can come in later and toll the northbound ramps that will charge motorists nearly 60 cents per vehicle and over a $1.00 per truck for the “privilege” of using a public roadway for which we already pay taxes. The RMA initially promised to build the whole interchange non-toll, but cut the project in half once the feds found out their plans to toll the northbound ramps and insisted it be a part of the new environmental study required for the 281 & 1604 toll roads. If they’d drop the toll roads, the northbound ramps could also be built NOW with existing stimulus money.

But because they just can’t stop seeing green from all the money they stand to make from tolling us, they continue to thumb their noses at the thousands of citizens opposed to tolling these freeways (who have fought it at the local, state, and federal level for 5 years now), and proceed to ram it down our throats anyway, abusing taxpayer money to the tune of $84 million (that’s the cost of the extra “enhancements” on the project that have NOTHING to do with the interchange, which is designed to blow through the extra money that should be going to build the northbound ramps that have a published cost of $59 million).

Compare Cost:
$59 million (published cost for 4 northbound ramps for 281/1604 interchange)

$140 million (published cost for 4 southbound ramps for 281/1604 interchange)

$155 million (actual cost for ALL 8 ramps of 410/281 interchange that opened June of 2008)

What’s wrong with this picture?

Padding the cost to taxpayers
The interchange project also closes 3 entrances/exits that exist today and make all traffic exiting or entering 281 to/from the frontage roads have to sit through two traffic lights instead of one.  I wonder if Costco, Walmart, and HEB realize the hassle these “improvements” will create for their customers? It’s certainly guaranteed to make access to the neighborhoods affected a nightmare! Then, the plan pads the project with re-surfacing all of 1604 from Bitters to Redland and 281 from Bitters to 1604 (this isn’t even needed compared to the poor condition of 281 north of 1604 and could be funded out of maintenance dollars, not the scarce funds for new construction), as well as lighting, sidewalks, and two pedestrian bridges.

They’re also adding numerous “auxiliary lanes” (on 1604 westbound from Bitters to Stone Oak and 281 northbound and southbound from Bitters to 1604), which is a way to add capacity without calling it adding capacity in order to get around environmental hurdles. Yet, they claim NO added capacity nor any overpasses can be added to 281 north of 1604 until the new environmental study is completed in 3-5 years. So let me get this straight, the RMA can add two stories (70+ feet high) to the 281/1604 interchange and add lanes to both 1604 west and 281 south of 1604, but it can’t build a few overpasses (23 feet high) or add any lanes to 281 north using the same category of environmental review? What hypocrites!

Any thinking person can see the unequal application of the law, and that’s why citizens blasted the RMA for its misplaced priorities, flagrant abuse of taxpayer money, and for playing games with people’s lives for their own gain.

Net gain or net loss?
While the taxpayers want and deserve this long overdue interchange non-toll, the RMA acknowledged Monday night that the ramps would only shave 5 minutes from the current conditions. Compare that to the exponential time savings of overpasses on 281 north, and it’s a no-brainer where this money ought to be spent and where the congestion problem really lies.

Web Posted: 01/11/2010
Work on North Side interchange may start soon
By Josh Baugh
Express-News

The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority could begin building a nontolled interchange between U.S. 281 and Loop 1604 on the North Side — relieving gridlock at the city’s most congested intersection — by the summer.

But during a meeting Monday to present the project’s draft environmental document to the public, the RMA came under fire for everything from plans to install pedestrian bridges and additional lighting to the existence of potholes in a subdivision neighboring the project.

About a dozen residents voiced concerns and opposition to the $140 million project, which would build an interchange connecting northbound U.S. 281 to Loop 1604 in both directions, and east- and westbound 1604 to southbound U.S. 281.

The RMA will include comments from Monday’s meeting — and further comments submitted by Jan. 21 — in its environmental document, known as a “categorical exclusion,” which must receive approval from the Federal Highway Administration for the project to proceed.

Toll road opponent Terri Hall, founder of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom, said her group doesn’t officially oppose the project yet, but it has some concerns over it. Hall said she believes the interchange will stifle access to adjacent neighborhoods and shopping centers and could produce air and noise pollution.

Hall also objects to the RMA’s plans to gain environmental clearance through a categorical exclusion — the lowest level of environmental review.

“We hope they’re not cutting corners with how they’re designing this project,” Hall said, adding that she hopes the RMA will address her group’s concerns before the project is built.

Read the rest of the story here.
_______________________________________________________________
U.S. 281/Loop 410 interchange ramps are complete
Express-News
Web Posted: 06/10/2008

One of the most widely ridiculed features of San Antonio’s highway network — the lack of an interchange at Loop 410 and U.S. 281 — slipped into history Monday with the opening of the last two ramps.

Crews opened the ramps from both directions of U.S. 281 to eastbound Loop 410 before rush hour, Texas Department of Transportation spokeswoman Anikka Ayala-Rogers said.

“Oh, really?” said Ken Kephart, an automobile diagnostician who uses Loop 410 and U.S. 281 half a dozen times a week to get to jobs. “Well, when I came to San Antonio 25 years ago, I didn’t see how they got along without access.”

Work began three years ago on the $155 million interchange, and the first of the eight ramps started opening in June 2007. Bonds squeezed the work from about 10 years to a record 31/2.

Motorists such as Kephart found the shorter schedule hard to believe, especially after upgrading the interchange at Interstate 10 and Loop 410 dragged on for a decade, with the last ramps opening there just seven months ago.

Read the rest of the article here.

Peters now hired hand of Zachry, Cornyn calls for toll roads & gas taxes

Link to article here.

No further evidence is needed for former Transportation Secretary Mary Peters’ motivation for her statement below. She’s lobbying lawmakers to end the moratorium on private toll road contracts (called CDAs or PPPs) that sell our Texas roads to the highest bidder on Wall Street and grant monopolies to private corporations because she’s the hired hand of Zachry, a major beneficiary of these contracts!

Then, there are other articles below that report on the comments of other players at the Texas Transportation Forum held in DFW, primarily addressing transportation funding issues. Of course, it was stacked with politicians, like John Cornyn, who echo Peters and want to sell our TX roads to their friends on Wall Street. This is the MOST expensive way to fund roads (coming from so-called fiscal conservatives): it fleeces taxpayers (75 cents PER MILE in toll taxes), grants monopolies, and limits expansion of free roads surrounding toll roads, to name a few. Cornyn also wants to raise the gas tax. So he wants a double whammy…

Bush transportation secretary urges Texas to re-authorize private toll roads

By Michael Lindenbarger
January 7, 2010
Dallas Morning News

Texas lawmakers should reauthorize private toll roads in the Lone Star State when they return to Austin in 2011, former U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters told Texans Thursday.

With little likelihood that Congress will pass meaningful transportation reform, or find long-term funding solutions, in 2010, Peters said states will do well to send strong messages that they are doing their part to solve their transportation challenges. Toll roads, and the ability to attract private investors to pay for them, are one way many states, including Texas, have used to do just that, she said.

Under Gov. Rick Perry, Texas emerged as the leader among states in pursuing private toll roads but that momentum was halted last year, when the Legislature allowed the legal authority for most private toll roads in Texas to lapse.

“That moratorium on public private partnerships should be removed,” she said. “The state of Texas should put that in abeyance. Restoring (private toll roads) here in Texas could show the federal government that you are really serious about tackling your own transportation problems.”
Zachry American Infrastructure, in partnership with ACS, was chosen by TxDOT as the Master Developer for Interstate 69 in Texas. Zachry American Infrastructure partnered with Cintra to form SH 130 Concession Company, which is developing SH 130 segments 5 and 6.

Peters is now a paid consultant — or “senior adviser” — to Zachry American Infrastructure, a private toll road (and other infrastructure) developer affiliated with Zachry Construction, a Texas construction company founded in 1924. TxDOT tapped the infrasture development firm to provide a master plan for Interstate 69 in Texas, and the company joined with Cintra to develop SH 130 in Austin. (Note: this paragraph was changed to remove an inaccurate reference to Zachry being a Spanish firm. It is headquartered in San Antonio. -ML)

Peters spoke at the annual Texas Transportation Forum, a talk fest sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation involving hundreds of engineers, local officials, financiers and others.

The issue of private toll roads will return when the 2011 session of the Texas Legislature begins. Both candidates for governor — Perry, the incumbent, and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison — have said they support private toll roads, though Hutchison has said Perry has placed too much emphasis on tolls in general as governor.Congress has been struggling with transportation financing for more than a year, as the 2005 authorization bill formally expired last year. It has been extended by a series of emergency spending measures, but states like Texas have faced uncertainty about whether they can count on the federal government to provide the funding needed for projects currently under construction.She said rather than bite the bullet and pass the massive reauthorization bill — one version of which, introduced in the House last year, would cost $500 billion — Congress will opt instead to pass the Jobs for Main Street bill as a kind of second stimulus, make a few changes to keep the highway trust fund solvent and put off the tougher questions about transportation funding until 2011, she said.The jobs bill, lampooned by Republicans as “son of stimulus,” totals $154 billion, she said.

“I do think the Jobs for Main Street bill will pass this year, in some form, but I think it will be passed at the expense of a long-term reauthorization bill,” she said. “I just don’t think the political will is there (to pass transportation reauthorization).

If the jobs act does become law — and it faces opposition in the Senate — it would mean nearly $40 billion more for American highways, perhaps as soon as later this year. That’s almost as much as the states received for roads and bridges in 2009 as part of the first — (and much larger) stimulus package.

Texas would receive about $2.5 billion, about the same it received in 2009.

________________________________________________________

Link to article here.
Cornyn, Pickett to speak this morning; Meanwhile: Is ‘transportation crisis’ real?
Fri, Jan 08, 2010 | By Michael Lindenberger/Reporter
Dallas Morning News
Probably the most interesting thing that former Transportation Secretary Mary Peters said yesterday was that the reason efforts to convince Congress and Texas lawmakers alike to get serious about providing long-term solutions to transportation is that lawmakers, like voters, have not yet accepted as true claims that we are in the midst of a transportation crisis.

Until they do, she said, no serious change — and that includes no serious discussion of new revenues or taxes — will take place. And lawmakers won’t believe it’s a crisis until voters do.

That we’re in the midst of a transportation — and other infrastructure — crisis is an article of faith among most of the folks at this annual Transportation Forum, as it is for leaders of the Texas Department of Transportation, local officials that lead the Regional Transportation Council in North Texas, and crusading lawmakers like Texas Sen. John Carona.

There is some room for debate about just how bad the crisis is, but the figures that tout our need versus our available funds usually reach in the scores of billions, if not hundreds of billions, over the next 20 years. (The Society of American Civil Engineers says when all our aging infrastructure is taken into account, the bill reaches into the trillions.)

The problem is, most folks get to where they want to go just fine: The roads are more or less smooth, the bridges don’t collapse (other than that one in Minneapolis) and the water comes on when you turn on your faucet. Where’s the crisis?

Truth is, most people experience the transportation crisis as a commuter irked by traffic jams — but most of us even get use to those over time, and as long as they are steadily worse, and not suddenly worse, we don’t get crazed about it.

Instead, the more immediate “crisis” for most Texas drivers is the one affecting their wallets — the higher tolls and sometimes higher gas prices.

None of this is to suggest that Carona and the other folks urging real solutions — and higher taxes — for transportation are wrong. They’ve certainly got the big picture down of how a city and state continues to grow and attract business and jobs, and clean its air — and all of that stuff is going to take money, or it will cost us money down the road if we don’t act.

I get that. But Peters, who believes that we do have a crisis, is right to say that the challenge the planners, politicians and engineers face when trying to make change is that so far, most folks simply don’t believe them. And even when in their heart of hearts they think something needs to change, they don’t trust the system to get it right.

I’ll write more this afternoon, after we hear from a series of federal lawmakers — most of whom we can expect will tell us we’re in a crisis. Texas House transportation chairman Joe Pickett will speak — he’s one of the guys pushing for a gas tax increase in 2011 — and so will Sen. Robert Nichols, who knows his way around transportation, too.

At noon, Sen. John Cornyn speaks and I’m interested to see if he takes on transportation seriously as he prepares for a likely future as the state’s senior U.S. Senator. He’s not been big on transportation on the past, but it’s interesting to see him on the line up with a keynote address.

More on that, and much else, later right here, on the transportation blog.

____________________________________________________________

Link to article here.

Cornyn: Private tolls should be part of the answer, but only part
Fri, January 8, 2010, By Michael Lindenberger
Dallas Morning News
AUSTIN — Sen. John Cornyn said today that private toll roads should be part of the solution as government leaders in Texas and in Washington struggle to pay for new roads, bridges and other transportation infrastructure.

They just shouldn’t be the only solution, he added in a speech the closed a half-week of transportation chit-chat among hundreds gathered for the fifth annual Texas Transportation Forum.

“The first solution many people point to is say, ‘We can solve this with more money.’ Certainly, money can solve a lot of the problems but it can’t solve all of them,” Cornyn said.

If government leaders did a better job of explaining the choices Texans face when it comes to paying for roads, they might be more supportive of not just new toll roads but even other expenses, like higher gas tax rates. But for now, he said, government has done too poor a job in discussing those realities — as evidenced, he said, by the voter pushback that led lawmakers in Austin to end the state’s authority to enter into new private toll road deals.

“To quote Milton Friedman, there is no free lunch,” he said. Voters know that, but they resent seeing “solutions” pushed on them from above. “I have always believed that leadership entails communication. You can’t just call in a room full of smart people and take the best ideas and impose them on people. Not in a democracy.”

He stopped short of explicitly calling on Texas lawmakers to restore the authority for private toll roads in 2011, as former Transportation Secretary Mary Peters did on Thursday.

When asked after his speech if he would flatly rule out a higher federal gas tax, he declined to do so. Instead, he said that he’d leave it up to voters to decide what they are willing to support after their leaders have done a better job of explaining the trade offs involved. If drivers felt they could get a quicker ride to work for a reasonable increase in tolls or other fees, they might sign on, he said.

Earlier Friday, Texas House transportation chairman Joe Pickett, D-El Paso, told the same audience that the 2011 session will be extremely tough for any efforts, including his own, to raise taxes or even to shift funds away from other items to spend more on transportation, as Gov. Rick Perry has said is a better approach than raising taxes.”We’re already being told behind the scenes that his is going to be very tough budget session,” Pickett said. Add to that, he said, the forced politicization that will come about as a result of redistricting — and it means 2011 is going to be a very difficult session to reach compromises over transportation funding.

“Politically, this is the time when the zealots in both parties come out and fight for every little bit of ground, and will make people like Sen. Nichols and Rep. Pickett not speak to each other.”

In that climate, he said, even something as widely supported in principle as ending the gas tax diversions — the practice of diverting gas taxes to pay for non-transportation related items — gets complicated. “The first thing that happens when you say, ‘let’s end these diversions,’ which everyone rushes to say they support, is you go to the budget-writers and say let’s find $1.2 billion in general revenue. That’s when I go to Sen. Nichols, and ask for help, he tells me ‘No, and I hate you.'”

He got a laughs for the I hate you line, but his point is that real compromise across party lines will be tough in 2011. And in a year when budget writers will be worrying about every penny, he said support for ending the diversions will be hard to find.

Editorial: Perry's hypocrisy, cronyism with toll roads

Link to article here.

This statement sums up his column and why politicians like Perry, Hutchison (despite her ad that indicates she’s against foreign-owned toll roads like the Trans Texas Corridor, her transportation plan states she FOR road privatization), Cornyn, Nichols, and others continue to push the privatization of our public roads:

It’s not about doing the right thing for Texas; it’s about selling out Texans for Wall Street’s fun and profits.

Toll Roads: By the Numbers

Posted Friday, Jan. 08, 2010

“I’m not real fond of raising [gas] taxes when there’s a recession going on.” — Texas Governor Rick Perry, quoted at www.rickperry.org

Our governor keeps shifting his excuse for opposing the gasoline taxes that would bring all Texans highways equal to the sharply increased traffic demand. Gov. Perry’s position, quoted above, rings false for several reasons:

1. He was against raising the gasoline tax in the best of financial times. You’ll find out why in a moment.

2. The proposed tax that Perry was rejecting to get our highway construction in gear to accommodate past and future growth was one thin dime per gallon.

3. Of all the things government does with tax dollars that give huge immediate returns to the national or state GDP, infrastructure investment tops a very short list. Some have suggested that every dollar invested in new roads adds $6 to the economy as it is spread around. That’s an overstatement, but easily $1.50 or more returns to the economy for every new highway dollar spent.

4. Highway funds go to hire people to build roads and supply the construction material: Therefore, road construction quickly lessens any recession’s effect.

Step Over a Dime: Expensive PR

Years ago I wrote that, having had the same gasoline tax for nearly 20 years, Texas easily could add a dime to the price of gas and get the roads built that we desperately need. That dime could come close to fully funding new construction to lower the congestion caused by our massive growth. This was the legitimate use for such funds; after all, government is supposed to invest for our economic future.

Looking at Department of Energy data on gasoline use in Texas, over the past decade that dime per gallon could have added close to $12 billion to our highway fund.

Keep in mind that 11 years ago gas was selling for 99 cents, so a dime per gallon would not have been missed. Come to think of it, drivers would have missed that amount even less when gasoline was $4 a gallon. But therein lies the hypocrisy: Elected officials, both state and federal, refused to raise taxes to fund new highways claiming “no new taxes” — but said not a word when speculators took oil from under $12 a barrel in 1999 to $147 in the summer of 2008. A dime for needed highways, very bad; but untold hundreds of billions of dollars for oil speculators is OK?

Nobody likes higher taxes, but that’s because the average person doesn’t perceive any extra benefit from paying more. But public roads benefit everybody — and everyone can identify this smart use of public funds. And now? Allowing private corporations to build toll roads that everybody will have to use is just “new taxes” under a different name.

“Value-Priced” Motoring

When toll operators find their ventures insufficiently profitable they simply raise their tolls — again and again. Doubt that? Just look at the recent toll increases on the NTTA projects over in Dallas and Collin counties.

Maybe it’s time someone explained what it really costs you to drive on a toll road, as opposed to that extra dime a gallon to buy roads for everyone. You need to know this, because apparently Dallas Fort Worth will soon become America’s new Toll Road Capital.

Gordon Dickson published the most recent information on new toll roads in the Star-Telegram on December 27, 2009. His story contained this news: “Tolls could go as high as 75 cents per mile when congestion is at its worst. That could be more than five times higher than the average 14.5 cents per mile that motorists currently pay on Dallas-area toll roads. It’s a concept called ‘value pricing.’”

Up to 75 cents a mile, and it’s called value pricing?

That’s as Orwellian as doublespeak like “war is peace” and “freedom is slavery.”

Let’s Do the 4th-Grade Math

Building a toll road that you have to use has the exact same effect as paying a higher tax on gasoline to use that highway. Remember, whether the road is free or toll you still pay 38.4 cents in federal and state gasoline taxes; that’s the baseline for this calculation.

We will assume that your vehicle averages 20 miles per gallon: If you drive that vehicle 20 miles on a toll road charging the maximum 75 cents per mile, you pay your 38.4 cents in current taxes plus another $15 in tolls. Therefore tolls and taxes to drive on that road total $15.38 per gallon of gasoline. And to think you were complaining when gas was four bucks.

Even if you use the NTTA system and pay “only” 14.5 cents toll per mile, the net additional cost for each gallon of gas you burn on those toll roads means that you’re out the same as $3.28 per gallon for the luxury of driving on their private highway. And for $3.28 per gallon all you get is one road.

Money Distracts; Big Money Blinds

It’s not just Texas that is refusing to deal with crumbling, outdated or inadequate highway systems and instead turning the task over to private hands. But Texas is abdicating its sovereign duty to protect its citizens from the financial pressures of the highway privateers, not to mention its responsibility to build infrastructure for economic growth.

So how did politicians get the idea that privatizing roads across America was an acceptable future?

Two words: Goldman Sachs.

Yes, large Wall Street investment banks, led by Goldman, started advising states across the nation on how to raise fast money by diverting the most necessary publicly owned assets — roads — into private ownership. You have to admit, it’s brilliant, because it’s a forced and guaranteed market: Americans can’t get out of driving.

As Daniel Schulman and James Ridgeway wrote in their scathing article, “The Highwaymen,” in January of 2007, “Many similar deals are now on the horizon, and MIG and Cintra are often part of them. So is Goldman Sachs, the huge Wall Street firm that has played a remarkable role advising states on how to structure privatization deals — even while positioning itself to invest in the toll road market.

“Goldman Sachs’ role has not been lost on skeptics, who accuse the firm of playing both sides of the fence. ‘In essence, they’re double-dipping,’ says Todd Spencer, executive vice president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, a truckers’ group that opposes toll road privatization. ’They’re basically in the middle, playing one side against the other, and it’s really, really lucrative.’”

How does “really, really lucrative” for Wall Street translate into “value pricing” for us? It doesn’t. But it’s easy to see how getting 75 cents per mile for permission to drive on a single highway could be an extremely valuable price — for whoever owns that stretch of road.

Oh, and one other thing. These highway privateers can fully deduct the highway’s depreciation for the first 15 years of the lease. So they shelter their income from their highways and then some. That’s one reason why the non-partisan GAO released a study last summer, which concedes that there could be some upside to the concept, also warned that more studies need to be done now on “how best to identify and protect national public interests in future highway public-private partnerships.”

When Will This End?

In many states and before it’s over likely in Texas, roads already bought and paid for by taxpayers either have been or will be sold off to the highway privateers. Now that’s the ultimate insult: Citizens bought the road and maintained it, but the fact that so many drivers use them makes it financially attractive for the state to resell them to private concerns for hard cash. (Notice that no one is considering privatizing Texas’ Farm to Market Roads. There’s just not enough traffic for the expense.) Then those buyers recoup their investment by charging everyone new tolls — under contracts that often extend up to 99 years.

Worse, there’s more evidence of how Wall Street’s quiet PR campaign distorted this issue with the public. Just a few years ago Goldman Sachs put $3 billion into an account for investments into infrastructure, including highways. Goldman also gave $10,000 to Hillco Partners, who lobbied for the 2001 Texas ballot measure to allow for privately operated roads. According to public information, between 2002 and 2005 Goldman paid Hillco lobbyist J. McCartt $95,000 to continue this effort of privatizing our highways. And J. McCartt is a former aide to —you guessed it — Texas governor Rick Perry. No wonder Governor Perry refuses to release the minutes of his meetings on the privatization of our highways.

So, have you been sold on the idea that privatizing roads is a necessity, because our state has no money for new roads and, citing its “no new taxes” policy, steadfastly refuses to raise the gasoline tax by even a dime to build them? Think again. We’ve been set up.

The people selling this “innovative” concept are the same people who deregulated our utilities, leaving Texans paying the nation’s highest electricity rates. It’s not about doing the right thing for Texas; it’s about selling out Texans for Wall Street’s fun and profits.

© 2009 Ed Wallace

Ed Wallace has received the Gerald R. Loeb Award for business journalism, given by the Anderson School of Business at UCLA, and is a member of the American Historical Association. He reviews new cars every Friday morning at 7:15 on Fox Four’s Good Day, frequently contributes articles to BusinessWeek Online and hosts the top-rated talk show, Wheels, 8:00 to 1:00 Saturdays on 570 KLIF. E-mail: wheels570@sbcglobal.net, and access all of Ed’s work at his Web site, www.insideautomotive.com.

Commission orders study on tax for every mile you drive

Link to article here.

Should drivers be taxed by the mile?
Highway fund crunch has Texas ordering a study of that question
By PEGGY FIKAC
AUSTIN BUREAU
Houston Chronicle
January 3, 2010

The Texas Transportation Commission has directed a fresh study of the idea, and it is not alone. There are pilot projects in other states and nationally to gauge how such a tax would work.

Texas transportation officials say the study is meant to help give lawmakers information on options ahead of their next regular session in 2011, when they confront a funding squeeze that is expected to drain the highway fund of money for new construction contracts by 2012.

“We need to think differently about how we fund transportation,” Texas Transportation Commission Chairwoman Deirdre Delisi said at a Texas Taxpayers and Research Association forum in November.

Delisi said the vehicle-miles-traveled tax idea is controversial, but should be discussed because revenue from the state’s main source of transportation funding, the motor fuels tax, is declining. The gasoline tax has not been raised since 1991.

The commission asked the Texas Transportation Institute, which is part of the Texas A&M University System, to take the lead on the study. Commissioner Fred Underwood has emphasized that the commission’s goal is to give lawmakers alternatives.

“Let’s just make sure that we give them options, not conclusions,” he said.

Texas Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee Chairman John Carona, R-Dallas, has said an increase in the gasoline tax makes sense to him, but that has proven politically difficult so far. A vehicle-miles-traveled tax is “far into the future and way ahead of its time,” he said.

“It’s not coming to a gas station near you any time soon, but it also can’t be dismissed out of hand,” he said in e-mailed statement. “If study can lead us to better funding mechanisms than we are currently using, and we can address the concerns, then we have an obligation to keep at it.”

Just how a vehicle-miles-traveled tax would be assessed is part of the study. It could be as simple as drivers writing a check when they have their vehicles inspected or could involve in-car technology to more precisely track mileage, perhaps tacking on a charge when drivers fuel up by communicating with the gas pump.

The latter would allow for such things as different charges for rural versus urban driving, and for deductions when people travel out of state, noted Ginger Goodin, the Texas Transportation Institute research engineer leading the study. She said, however, that privacy concerns quickly arise when such technology is discussed.

“I think anywhere this has been discussed, that (privacy) is probably the issue that emerges among the top issues,” she said. “That will have to be addressed.”

The study will vet alternatives with technology experts, representatives of other states’ transportation agencies and with the public through focus groups. The work will be forwarded to a yet-to-be named committee of citizens to explore the policy implications.