MPO BOUGHT & SOLD…SEE WHO VOTED TO RAISE YOUR TAXES!

NON-COMPETE WILL PROHIBIT EXPANSION OF SURROUNDING FREE ROUTES!
These sorry excuses for elected representatives voted to limit ANY new roads or expansion of existing roads surrounding the the 281 tollway which undoubtedly includes, Stone Oak Pkwy, Bulverde Rd., Red Land Rd., and Blanco Rd. (up to a 4 mile area around the tollway by law, yep that counterfeit moratorium Perry rammed through allows it)!

MPO BOUGHT AND PAID FOR

Who voted to increase your taxes
Sheila McNeil,
Councilwoman, Dist. 2, called northsiders “those people” who can afford the tolls while taking thousands in campaign contributions from pro-toll interests like Zachry and Red McCombs
Diane Cibrian,
Councilwoman, Dist. 8, campaigned on lowering taxes but just voted FOR the largest tax increase in TX history! Today is the first day we enlist Jacob Dell to take her seat! Better yet, a RECALL!
Jack Leonhardt,
Windcrest Mayor, said he received 5,000 emails FOR and only a few hundred against (we confirmed that over 1,200 emails AGAINST were sent using our email alias)…so he lied!
Chico Rodriguez,
Bexar County Commissioner who has an opponent in the primary in March
William Weeper,
Claimed he received more emails in favor of tolls and was compelled to “do what the people want” and vote FOR a TAX INCREASE!
Joe Aceves,
county employee who did what pro-toll Judge Wolff told him to do even though 2 of the 3 commissioners on the MPO voted AGAINST and the county has twice passed a resolution AGAINST tolling existing freeways (which are smoke & mirrors and worthless apparently)
Two TxDOT votes (David Casteel & Clay Smith, one of the TxDOT employees seen walking into the Oct. 19 Valero meeting where the highway lobby strategized on how to win approval of the toll roads at today’s mtg)
Two Via Votes (Ruby Perez, who’s also chummy with Sheila McNeil, and Hank Brummet, who previously voted WITH us when he was on the MPO years ago…guess that proposed Park & Ride at Marshall Rd. was enough to co-opt them into voting FOR more highways against their own stated mission of mass transit)
Two City employees (one, Mark Webb, is the boss of a Via Board member Ruby Perez, and Jelynne Burley is the other)

The few heroic GOOD GUYS
Commissioner Tommy Adkisson (wait till you see his impassioned speech when we get it on YouTube, a true advocate of mass transit and simple solutions like contraflow lanes, etc.)
Commissioner Lyle Larson (noted the Legislature is just as guilty for raiding gas taxes)
Rep. David Leibowitz (he’s a fabulous litigator and got the RMA to admit to a non-compete and to tolling existing roads)
Senator Carlos Uresti (poked holes in the RMA’s numbers, logic, determined their plan doesn’t achieve congestion relief AT ALL for those who cannot afford tolls)

THANK YOU FOR THE CALLS, EMAILS, AND COMING TO THE MEETING
YOUR SUPPORT STILL MOUNTED A HISTORIC, FORMIDABLE FIGHT

Many of your fellow citizens have spent countless hours handing out fliers, driving around mobile billboards, making phone calls, and helping turn out the show of force at today’s meeting. We all owe them a debt of gratitude! It did make a difference, the highway lobby had to work their fingers to the bone to get these toll rates passed. They’ve never had to mount such a defense before, we’re making progress and many of the pro-tollers, especially McNeil, took a MAJOR beating in today’s meeting.

In an astonishing marathon 5 hour meeting, more than 200 people filled the room IN THE MIDDLE OF THE WORKDAY! That’s BY FAR the most we’ve ever been able to muster during the workday! CONGRATULATIONS! The vast majority of those in attendance were against tolls. When the highway lobby was asked to stand in favor of tolls by the new SAMCO President Terrell McCombs, I didn’t even count 40 of them. Many of the seat warmers that always seem to gravitate to the right side of the room are TxDOT staffers and City and County employees (all sitting there on the public’s dime, of course). We had at least 150 people there, plus approximately 40 more outside who were initially turned away since the room hit capacity. There was standing room only in the back and around the edges of the room, but they eventually let our folks inside as people started to leave.

DOG & PONY SHOW
It was nearly 2 full ours before a single ordinary citizen was given the chance to speak. Of course, Chairwoman “Those People” McNeil, allowed the RMA to go up there and make some long-winded pointless “presentation” that was nothing more than tolling authority Chair and ex-Mayor Bill Thornton spinning all the reasons why a $475 million toll road is the best and ONLY option compared to the $170 million FREEway fix (when adjusted for inflation from 2004 dollars). They showed their fancy “simulation” of the proposed project which shows a completely inaccurate corridor with gobs of grassy, empty buffer between the toll lanes and the access roads. It also showed free flowing traffic on the frontage roads with no traffic stopped at the stop lights (it shows the sparse vehicles hitting all green lights).

Then TxDOT did it’s jig just to try and outlast the public at the meeting on their lunch hours. The highway lobby and their puppet politicians orchestrated quite a dog & pony show, including a scripted exchange between Councilwoman Diane Cibrian (who is officially a DOUBLE tax toller even though she ran on lowering your taxes, we need Jacob Dell to rescue Dist 8 from tax and spend Cibrian!), RMA Director Terry Brechtel and her sidekick Pat Irwin (the engineer who brought you the 28/410 debacle). Cibrian took offense to the SA Toll Party doing automated calls in her district to alert them to her campaign promise and today’s MPO vote to toll existing freeways. The call urged folks to call her to ask her vote NO on toll taxes. So rather than do what she told her district she would do, lower taxes, she equivocated and called tolls a “user fee” and tried to get Brechtel and Irwin to say they weren’t tolling existing right of way or roadway already paid for. They threw in a totally preposterous contention that a 20 lane toll road is better for the aquifer than the current 4-6 freeway (ever heard of impervious cover, Councilwoman?)!

A ZINGER!
That is until Rep. David Leibowitz, a litigator by profession, finally pinned down Terry Brechtel and got her to admit they’re tolling EXISTING right of way/roads ALREADY PAID FOR BY THE TAXPAYER!

CITIZEN CONCERNS:
STILL MORE SECRET THAN KNOWN

A bus load of folks came in from Sheila McNeil’s district to tell her they didn’t want toll roads for ANYONE, northside or not. A very articulate college student chided the MPO for voting on the completely wrong issue….the price of gas will have far more to do with shaping future transportation than ANY road. What they’re building will likely be obsolete by the time it’s finished, because the energy crisis will force a change in vehicular travel unless our failed leadership acts to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. The Federal Highway Administration stats show vehicle miles travel in Texas is slowing and remaining flat, not increasing as the MPO and TxDOT aggressive traffic demand models project.

So I essentially said this: if all of their financial “assumptions” are based on a constantly changing set of variables that is more akin to trying to shoot at a moving target than accurately assessing the amount of growth on the northside, and the price of gas could impact those assumptions/projections very quickly with a steady rise in the price of oil. We have yet to see ANY reports that show the impact of high gas prices on toll viability.

It’s absolutely UNBELIEVABLE that these officials carrying the water for the highway lobby voted for financial terms when they didn’t even know what they were!

Senator Carlos Uresti, Rep. David Leibowitz, and Commissioner Tommy Adkisson grilled the RMA (who wouldn’t answer a direct question for 6 of the 7 hour meeting) and Uresti poked so many holes in Terry Brechtel numbers you drive a truck through them! Those who witnessed the do-anything-but-answer-a-question-and-let-the-cat-out-of-the-bag dance by the RMA were incredulous at how corrupt and dishonest our government officials are from top to bottom. The highway lobby is in complete control of that MPO Board and our government. They’ve figured out how to exploit government power for their private interests. We live in a “corporatocracy.”

Rep Nathan Macias, on the House Transportation Committee, addressed the Board and expressed his frustration that the MPO decisions to toll Bexar County adversely affect EVERY county he represents yet Dist. 73 HAS NO REPRESENTATION ON THE MPO! He’s found 95% of the folks in Comal, Kendall, Gillespie, and Bandera counties OPPOSE TOLLS! Macias is a TRUE WARRIOR for our cause in the Texas Legislature. He mentioned his distaste for the propaganda TxDOT spews instead of having a meaningful dialogue and working toward genuine solutions.

NEVER, EVER GIVE UP! LET THE PEOPLE VOTE!

TURF & Toll Party Testimony prior to MPO vote to approve 281 toll rates

NOTE: Unedited version
Testimony limited to 9 minutes, then 3 minutes

MPO Statement
281 Financial Terms & Texas Mobility Funds Vote
December 3, 2007

This board is about to cast one of the most controversial in its history.

Let’s evaluate the leadership of this Board. I have had a flood of email, blog comments, and phone calls expressing shock and outrage at the biased, divisive, and inflammatory comments made by Councilwoman McNeil about the northside and about those who cannot afford toll roads.

First, her comments were completely inaccurate, in fact, only the top 1% of income earners make $300,000 a year. Ms. McNeil tried to back away saying she meant average home value, but that’s also inaccurate. The average home value is only $159,000, and, in fact, you can hardly give away a home in Stone Oak right now. She repeated these comments TWICE, and referred to those who have worked long hours and sacrificed much to live up North, as “THOSE PEOPLE.” Ms. McNeil said exactly what she meant to say and no amount of spin can change it.

Second, her comments were extremely divisive in nature, pitting one side of town against another when we’re all in this together. These are the public’s highways and we all depend on them to live and work. What was most astonishing about her comments was the ease with which she told her own constituents that if they can’t afford the tolls (with the average income in her district at $14,000 a year, it seems few if any can afford tolls) they can be relegated to second-class citizens and take the congested access roads! Knowing I-35 is already in the toll plans, she defended her plan to vote to toll the northside, but indicated she wouldn’t be as eager in her own backyard. That isn’t leadership; it’s outright hypocrisy.

We ask that Ms. McNeil resign as Chair immediately and not preside over this vote since she’s clearly biased the Board and has used flagrantly false data to skew the debate in a discriminatory manner. I’ve received dozens of letters like these since her comments were made public:

“The MPO Chair has breached her duty to the citizens of San Antonio. She should resign. Neither my income nor my home value approaches $300K and even if they did, that is not justification for confiscating an existing right-of-way. Does the MPO Chair think that 281 is used only by the ‘rich’? Disband this atrocious body.”

“The MPO Chair has been exposed for what she really is. Put an end to this divisiveness. She should resign.”

“The video of Sheila McNeil’s presentation to her ‘constituents’ was an eye-opener…Ms. McNeil should not be on the MPO given her clear bias in favor of toll roads. She should be as embarrassed in making those comments as was in watching her make them. I was never motivated one way or the other about the 281 tolls, but incidents like this make it hard not to get involved.”

“I am extremely disturbed by (these comments)…(they) are not only totally inappropriate, they are completely inaccurate. I am a Mexican-American blue-collar worker who lives on the Northside. I acquired my home and my income level through hard work (10 to 12 hour days). Nobody has given me ANYTHING. EVERYTHING that I have, I have worked (my ___ off) to acquire. I do not appreciate your assertion that because I have what I do and live where I do, I should, therefore, be required to pay tolls on the roads that I use… Please resign your position on the MPO.”

You get the idea…Ms. McNeil needs to resign from the Board. A KSAT 12 poll last Friday showed 86% of respondents think McNeil should NOT preside over the toll road vote today.

Next, it’s DOUBLE TAXATION to toll an existing road:

“We have lived in the north central part of San Antonio area for 10 years. In that time TxDot promised to improve traffic conditions on 281N by building overpasses. The money was projected, the promises were made, taxes were collected, and nothing.

Meanwhile, the city and county has approved thousands and thousands of homes to be developed up and down the 281 corridor. Still no traffic relief. No overpasses. Nothing.

For the last few years the new idea is tolling 281. Why? Where are the overpasses? IF they had been built when promised we would know definitively if they improved traffic (which in all theory they would.) However, (TxDOT says) the monies for overpasses have been spent elsewhere.

We do not need toll roads. We need what has been promised, funded and denied.”

Hwy 281 needs overpasses, not a toll road. The ORIGINAL gas tax funded plan promoted in public hearings in 2001 included overpasses AND expanding the highway to 6 lanes, AND adding access roads to get to existing businesses. This plan as evidenced in the MPO’s and TxDOT’s own documents was supposed to be let in 2003, and TxDOT FAILED to install the promised fix, which has NOTHING to do with a lawsuit filed in late 2005.

The pricetag for the gas tax plan, $100 million in 2004 dollars. TxDOT has confirmed repeatedly in several news stories that it has $100 million in gas taxes for 281. They had the money and failed to fix the road. So the blame for the situation on US 281 rests solely at TxDOT’s feet. As Ms. McNeil so nicely stated, they have targeted where they think the money is, on the northside, and they want to extort money from commuters and make them buy back the road they’ve already bought and paid for.

That brings us to today. Let’s adjust the cost of the original gas tax plan using the construction index to today’s dollars, it’s up to $170 million. TxDOT is NOT making an apples to apples comparison when it compares the gas tax plan cost to today’s estimated toll road costs. The toll road is up to 20 lanes, the original plan called for only 10. They’re not the same plans; therefore, the cost of the gas tax plan cannot be compared to toll road costs as if they were the same plan. Given the Texas Mobility Funds available, there is NO EXCUSE to spend $475 million to toll 281 when a $170 million gas tax plan would do the job. With FHWA stats showing the growth has slowed in this corridor, this plan is indeed more than sufficient to fix the road and keep it a FREEway, though TxDOT will always claim otherwise, either though the gas tax plan is their own plan based on aggressive MPO growth patterns in the first place. The only thing that changed was TxDOT’s leadership who is shoving toll roads down our throats and asking you politicians to follow them into your own political ruin.

Given the information in an Express-News article on the Park & Ride controversy at 281 and Marshall Rd. just yesterday, portions of this toll road will traverse over the most sensitive area of the Edwards Aquifer Recharge zone and yet TxDOT after one lawsuit and more than a year later has FAILED to do an Environmental Impact Study and claims there is “no significant impact” in building a 14-20 lane toll road over the aquifer. Clearly, the facts say differently as Carlos Guerra’s column addressed yesterday.

NEXT, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
This Board ought NOT to give equal weight to what started as a stealth email campaign by the highway lobby. It was hatched in a backroom at Valero, October 19, and meant to give the appearance of legitimate public opinion in favor of tolls when supporters should have come clean and stated where they work and that they have a financial interest in toll roads when corresponding. When a person has something to gain financially, they need to DISCLOSE IT when trying to influence the vote. A public official or RMA board member has to recuse him or herself from any votes or even the debate they have financial ties to what’s being discussed.

The emails you received in favor of tolls have to be considered on this basis. In contrast, what does count is the LEGAL RECORD at the 281 & 1604 NEPA public hearings with over 90% of the OFFICIAL public comment being opposed. There was no official, nor announced process for this MPO to collect public comments for this vote.

But in response to the SAMCO and Chamber-led email campaign, you received nearly 1,200 emails opposed to tolls. Over 35 businesses including dozens of CPAs and Independent consultants wrote in opposition to tolls as well as active duty & retired military and public school teachers.

Then, I personally witnessed Sheila McNeil and 2 TxDOT employees, one that sits on this board, Clay Smith, enter that closed door meeting at Valero where the stated purpose (in this SAMCO memo: READ EXACT WORDS) was to win approval of the terms and funding for 281/1604 toll projects on December 3. Since Vic Boyer who is also an ex-officio member of this board, was also there, this starts sounding an awful lot like collusion to me.

SECRECY/FINANCIAL TERMS:
Despite a sham letter from David Casteel to a few of our elected officials, the meaningful financial guts of the 281 toll rates are still secret. It’s tantamount to malfeasance to vote on this without knowing whether or not there is a non-compete agreement, what the impact of gas prices are on toll viability since other studies have shown toll roads are NOT viable once gas hits $3 a gallon, and what other factors can potentially affect toll rates if the assumptions used change! Essentially, you’re being asked to make a FINAL decision to approve a “draft” document without reviewing a single Traffic and Revenue Study and without knowing CRITICAL financial terms and impacts.

What’s most egregious is the study that has been done says that given the toll term assumptions made, “US 281 has a negative net present market value” and a “tax subsidy” would be required to complete the project. They repeatedly say these toll rates are based on the assumptions made but what happens if those assumptions don’t become reality and we have an oil embargo, or development slows or traffic continues to stay flat and fails to grow at the rate both TxDOT and MPO demand models show?

Here is a chart of the FHWA TX stats that shows traffic (VMT) has NOT GROWN and remained FLAT since the steady of rise in the price of gasoline began in 2005. (SHOW SLIDES)

The Government Accountability Office points out that benefit-cost analysis can be a valuable tool for helping decision makers. Local and state officials here have been denied this tool having never even conducted one, they’ve only taken the benefit-cost ratio as gospel with no documentation of it whatsoever.

Richard Perez’s op ed yesterday notes that “…costs for roadway construction projects have risen 72 percent in the last five years.” Instead of cutting back, Perez says “We can’t wait.” At some point, the cost of a project exceeds the benefits. We don’t know the full costs and benefits of any of these projects and whether the benefits exceed the costs.

When the toll road only goes the same distance that should have built in 2003 and you’re being asked to scramble today in order to extend the RMA project to the county line using a hefty tax subsidy that roughly equals the cost of the ORIGINAL gas tax plan, it’s clear tolling this freeway is a tax grab. There’s a viable, more affordable, less invasive and most importantly QUICKER option, so there is NO ACCEPTABLE EXCUSE to do this toll project when your own study says it’s a net LOSER! The highway lobbyists in this room are the ONLY reason to proceed because that’s who will make money off this boondoggle!

At this point, there’s more that you as decision-makers don’t know than you do know. You don’t know whether there’s a BIG FAT GOTCHA in these plans, but judging by everything else TxDOT touches, you can bet there is one. You ought to know by now the devil is in the details, and you don’t have the details upon which to make an informed public policy decision.

TxDOT and the RMA will say and do ANYTHING to get toll roads. Remember The State Auditor and the Texas Transportation Institute both found TxDOT’s figures are bloated and the Auditor specifically stated their figures “cannot be relied upon to make public policy decisions.” Commissioner Larson called them snake oil salesmen for a reason. You cannot trust what they say or believe any assurances they give you. If this is truly the best option, when why the secrecy? Why can’t they be open about it with the public and even MPO Board members and legislators who have oversight over TxDOT?

Leroy Alloway of the RMA alluded that there is a non-compete agreement and he tried to assure opponents that it wouldn’t prevent TxDOT or the City from expanding the roads, only the RMA. But the City is rabidly pro-toll and TxDOT has a policy that all new capacity will be tolled, too! This will guarantee congestion on our neighborhood streets, this is an OUTRAGE, and you can’t let it happen on your watch!

Among our politicians on the federal level –

Senator Hutchison and Senator Cornyn are opposed to the state tolling existing federal highways. The entire South Texas congressional delegation opposes the state plan.

Hutchison who passed a moratorium on tolling existing interstates said:
“My bill will protect drivers from paying tolls on roads that were already paid for by taxpayers.”

“Tolling existing freeways — the lifeblood of moving goods and services — is bad public policy, and states like Pennsylvania and Texas would incur irrevocable economic damage,” said Rep. John Peterson, R-Pa.

Then, Congressman Ciro Rodriguez who was instrumental in getting the moratorium passed said:
“Using toll roads to double-tax Texans is just plain wrong. I am very pleased that the final Transportation conference agreement contains an anti-tolling provision for federal highways in Texas. The citizens of Texas have spoken and they do not want the federal highways they have already paid for to be converted into toll roads. Working with Senator Hutchison, we put progress over politics for the benefit of Texas.”

We urge the Board to do just that, put special interest politics aside for the benefit of ALL Texans. Do not make the Texas taxpayers pay tolls for what’s already paid for. Give us the gas tax plan NOW!

We notified the public what is happening here today by doing over 200,000 automated calls over the weekend. We will also notify them how each of your voted tomorrow.

Will those who were able to take off work to be here to stand against the toll tax increases today, please stand to be recognized by the Board? This concludes my remarks…
__________________________________________

Texas Mobility Funds discussion –

At the May 2006 TX Bond Review Board Meeting, the record states TMF funds DO NOT NEED TO BE TIED TO TOLL ROADS, they can be used to build FREEWAYS. Prop 15 that the voters passed explicitly states they can used for FREEways. It is merely a TxDOT policy, NOT LAW, that is strong-arming this Board into applying them strictly to leveraged toll projects.

Use these funds to fix the most critical areas of 281 and 1604 NOW! This MPO designated these highways as high priority yet refuses to fund them other than as toll roads, which is the same method TxDOT uses. So how is this Board or the RMA “locally controlled”?

This $325 million total available TMF funds combined with the $100 million in gas taxes for 281 could build all of the needed improvements to 281, the interchange at 1604, and the most critical overpasses on Loop 1604 giving us the most critical fixes without endebting generations with risky bond debt at a time when gas prices continue to rise and put toll road viability at risk.

We all know the Legislature MUST address transportation funding next session. Sen. John Carona, Senate Transportation Committee Chairman, is already calling for indexing the gas tax and stopping the hemorrhaging of those gas tax revenues by ending the diversions through Constitutional Amendment to bypass Governor Perry. And we can all be thankful Mike Krusee, the single biggest impediment to getting meaningful funding addressed, spared us the time and expense of booting him from office by resigning first. If only the other tollers would do the same. If not, we’ll work hard to remove them.

Given that previous toll viability studies for 281 show 20 cents of every dollar collected in tolls goes to administration, it’s the very same problem we have now with the gas tax….diversions, not all of the money collected goes to transportation. So building more toll roads means we’re not actually fixing anything, we’re playing a more expensive ponzi scheme than we have now.

Then, the Sunset Review, a top to bottom review of TxDOT’s books, will also reveal the waste, fraud, and abuse of this agency run amok and allow Legislators to accurately determine the true transportation needs we need to fund, not bloated wish lists that are totally unrealistic at a time when concrete and asphalt prices will force changes to our government’s road building and toll road frenzy and force a change to driving habits now that even the International Energy Agency says cheap and easy access to oil has disappeared. We need GENUINE and REALISTIC transportation options, not more of the same, which is MORE DEBT and the biggest, most expensive toll road the highway lobby can dream up to enrich their own pocketbooks at the expense of the taxpaying public.

Toll roads cost anywhere from 10 to 40 times more money per mile than we pay now in gas taxes. Increasing the cost of transportation only HURTS the economy by sucking more money out of taxpayers pockets to travel to where they need to go, AND extracts more money from businesses who then have to charge their customers more which makes us all have to pay more for everything whether or not we take the toll road.

Why? To enrich a single industry, road contractors and their financiers? It’s downright criminal to crush our economy, and levy the largest tax increase in TX history to benefit the special few. We need to retain our seamless, efficient, freeway system EVERYONE CAN USE, not chop up our highways into a two-tiered system of expressways for the wealthy, and congested access roads for everyone else.

Use these TMF funds to fix 281 and 1604 as FREEWAYS NOW!

A representative list of businesses (whether the owner or its employees) who wrote in opposition to tolls:

Bill Reiffert & Assoc., Inc., Structural Engineers
Macina, Bose, Copeland and Associates, Inc.
TXCO Resources Inc. formerly: The Exploration Company
TEXAS INDUSTRIAL RUBBER & GASKET COMPANY
Food Safety Concepts International
Brandt Engineering Co.
Santex Ltd.
Kersey and Associates
Kirk Kothmann, DVM
Potters Wheel Productions
Edgar Chew & Associates
A-Bear Air Conditioning L.L.C.
Ince Distributing, Inc.
Findling, Milam & Pyle
Barrett & Sons, Inc.
Training, Rehabilitation & Development Institute
Corporate Express Business Interiors
Trinity University professors and employees
Groomer Seafoods
Methodist Healthcare
Scientific Aerospace Research Consulting (SARC), LLC an SDVO SBC (Service-Disabled, Veteran-Owned, Small Business Concern)
Pratt & Whitney, Serviceable Military Assets (SMA)
dNovus RDI
USA Cycling
T3 Technologies
SWTEC, Inc.
FCE Benefits
COMCO Systems
Traugott, Inc. Painting & Decorating
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SPECIALTIES, INC
Macina, Bose, Copeland and Associates, Inc.
CDF Properties, Real Estate Investments

Dozens of CPAs, active duty & retired military, public school teachers, and Independent consultants like pre-paid legal, Arbonne, Desktop Graphic Systems Consulting, etc. wrote in opposition to tolls as well.

Perez' pro-editorial only tells one side, and it's filled with half truths

Link to article here.

Richard Perez was the local waterboy for the highway lobby as Councilman and MPO Chair. He knows who butters his bread and he’s going to use the financial resources and backing of the Greater Chamber to get the toll road road heist done.

First of all, it isn’t “progress” to take on massive public debt nor is it “progress”to subsidize a toll road that can’t even pay for itself! Secondly, his wording is very misleading. He gives the illusion the existing expressway lanes that are there today will still be there when they’re done adding toll lanes. Not true, as was published in the Federal Register, the official legal notice for US 281, EVERY SINGLE HIGHWAY LANE will be converted to a TOLL LANE and the NEW lanes will be access roads with stop lights and slower speed limits which will be the ONLY non-toll option. There will be NO toll-free highway lanes!

Lastly, TxDOT’s resources are hardly “tapped out.” The Legislature just doubled TxDOT’s bonding capacity, transferred more general revenues to TxDOT, and voters just gave them an additional $5 billion in bonds November 6. Then, 281 overpasses have been funded since 2003. TxDOT REFUSES to build them toll-free with the gas tax money it already has in hand because they want to raid the wallets of the poor chaps unfortunate enough to live and work in the 281 corridor. It’s money grab, pure and simple. This is anything but progress or speeding up road projects, rather, road contractors and complicit politicians have teamed up to jam up traffic everywhere until motorists submit to their plan to rip-off taxpayers!

Richard Perez: Toll road plan will enhance S.A.’s future

Web Posted: 12/01/2007 07:11 PM CST

Richard Perez
If we look 10 years into the future, few decisions will impact our city’s road safety, economic development and quality of life more than the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Board decision scheduled for Monday. Which direction will we go? Will it be years of waiting, lawsuits and growing traffic, or will the city move forward?

The plan before the board is better than when we first discussed toll roads. When I served as chairman of the San Antonio-Bexar County MPO Transportation Policy Board, we included a toll system in the region’s long-range transportation plan. We were anxious that the system would be controlled in Austin. But now, the system is controlled locally by the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority. We were concerned that a foreign company would build the road and take the profits out of the U.S. But now, all profits stay in our region and will be used to maintain and expand future roadways.

We already see improvements. Through the hard work of Texas Transportation Commissioner Hope Andrade, we see remarkable construction on Interstate 10, the I-10/Loop 410 Interchange, the U.S. 281/Loop 410 Interchange, and Interstate 35 South from Military Drive to Division Avenue, to name a few. But these resources are tapped out.

We must take our next step toward progress. On Monday, members of the MPO Policy Board can pass a vote that provides long-term solutions to our traffic nightmare.

I support the MPO vote to add tolled lanes and direct connectors to the existing free expressway lanes. Here’s why.

We will always have free travel on U.S. 281 and Loop 1604. No one will ever be required to pay a toll. We will always have a free alternative adjacent to the toll lanes.

The free lanes on U.S. 281 will be in better shape once the toll roads are constructed. This design calls for adding lanes in the middle (where lanes currently do not exist). In order to do this, the design actually requires upgrades and enhancements to the current free lanes on U.S. 281, making free travel faster.

Traffic in San Antonio is getting worse every day. Congestion at key locations along U.S. 281 and Loop 1604 has already reached a level of “F” — the worst congestion ranking on a scale from A to F. And traffic continues to grow at 15 percent per year.

We have witnessed continued and significant federal and state transportation funding cuts; these cuts mean shrinking dollars for highways. Help is not coming any time soon from Washington, D.C. or Austin. Just this November, federal rescissions were announced, and the money once earmarked for transportation projects is no longer available. This also means that a significant portion of transportation projects the MPO Policy Board scheduled for 2008 will not happen or will be scaled back. We must solve this problem using our own resources.

The costs for roadway construction projects have risen 72 percent in the last five years. Intense global competition for raw materials such as cement, copper, steel, rubber and petroleum products has been a major factor in this rise. For example, a $100 million project in 2002 dollars now costs $172 million in 2007. We can’t wait.

When I served on the San Antonio City Council, my charge was to represent not only my district, but all the good people of our community. I always did my homework and acted in the best interests of San Antonio. As I take the reins of the chamber, my mission has not changed.

The chamber’s mission is to implement a long-term vision for a vibrant San Antonio. The plan before the MPO is our means. It is a fair solution, and at the end of the day, the only solution.


Richard Perez is president and CEO of the Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce. He formerly served two consecutive terms on the San Antonio City Council from 2003 – 2007.

Jaime Castillo:"Those people" comment discriminates against people based on where they live

Link to article here. View McNeil’s comments on YouTube here.

Jaime Castillo: McNeil just doesn’t get the toll-related frustration of ‘those people’
12/02/2007
San Antonio Express-News

I’ve been invited in the past by immigration hawks to “go back to Mexico,” even though I’m a third-generation U.S. citizen.And, from time to time, I’ve been lumped in with that vast media conspiracy which supposedly takes its p’s and q’s from an unseen deity named “Liberal.”

But, to my knowledge, last week was the first time I was branded one of “those people” merely because of where my family lives.

For that, I have City Councilwoman Sheila McNeil to thank.

In an attempt to ease the fears of her East Side constituents, McNeil last week added another chapter to the ongoing public relations nightmare perpetrated by toll-road proponents.

She did so by telling a gathering of homeowners that they need not worry about proposed toll rates on U.S. 281, which could be made official today, because the folks who live and drive on the north central corridor can afford it.

“Most of the people who use this road live out in that area. That’s who it impacts,” she said in videotaped comments Wednesday that are now part of Internet lore. “Now when they start coming over here on (Interstate) 35, then we can talk.

“But right now the decision we’re making next week is 281 and the folks who live and drive out there,” she continued.

“And those people can afford a toll, because the average income out there is probably around two, three hundred thousand dollars a year.”

At best, McNeil possesses an alarming ignorance of the city. At worst, she will stop at nothing to further her argument, including making up facts.

Express-News transportation writer Pat Driscoll, who blogged about the episode last week, noted the following:

“City stats say four out of five households in Council District 9, where half of the U.S. 281 tollway will be, earn less than $100,000 a year. More than half the district’s households make less than $60,000.”

Oops.

To be clear, as a resident along U.S. 281, I don’t believe McNeil was trying to start class warfare. But her comments reveal that toll-road backers, after months and months of public discourse, still don’t get the primary source of frustration for those who will be tolled.

It’s not about whether someone can afford to pay 17 cents a mile to travel on a tollway. Heck, I can afford to pay parking tickets, but I don’t rack them up on purpose just to save myself a few blocks worth of walking.

The issue, which admittedly is lost in the incessant frothing displayed by organized toll opponents, is that state transportation officials have never dealt from the top of the deck on the toll-road issue.

When it came to divulging financial details about the private partnership looking to build a section of the Trans-Texas Corridor, Gov. Rick Perry and his handpicked leadership of the Texas Department of Transportation did not just tell the public “no.”

They also told the office of Attorney General Greg Abbott, which ruled that the information was public record, to go fly a kite for more than a year and half.

Similarly, it has long been known that the state’s highway funding crisis is in large measure worsened by the fact that state lawmakers keep spending supposedly dedicated highway funds on non-road purposes.

So, acknowledging the anger that the practice generates, did Perry and toll fans lay down the law last legislative session?

Of course not. The biennial budget crafted earlier this year diverts another $1.6 billion from the fund.

Pardon me, Councilwoman McNeil, the issue is not whether a certain group of residents can afford something.

The issues is whether you, as chairwoman of the Metropolitan Planning Organization, will ever put your foot down for anybody outside your council district.

District 9 seat to be replaced by man with ties to highway firm

Link to article here.

Louis Rowe’s wife works for Carter Burgess, a well-known highway engineering firm that has lobbied for toll roads. The highway lobby will stop at NOTHING to ensure the citizens voices are drown out by private interests!

District 9 candidate list whittled down to 2
12/01/2007
Laura E. Jesse
Express-News

After seven hours of interviews and much deliberation Saturday, a panel of District 9 community and business leaders selected two people to recommend as Councilman Kevin Wolff’s interim replacement.As its first choice, the panel of eight selected Louis Rowe, president and CEO of Goetting & Associates Inc., an engineering consulting firm. Rowe also sits on the board of the San Antonio River Authority.

The second choice is Jane Fritz, director of client services for the law firm Pritchard, Hawkins, McFarland & Young. Fritz most recently was the community coordinator to promote San Antonio as the future site of the National Bio- and Agro-defense Facility.

The final choice, though, is up to the full City Council, which will more than likely vote on the replacement to fill his unexpired term in January.

Wolff said he is officially resigning his North Side council seat later this month to run for the Bexar County Commissioner Precinct 3 seat being vacated by Lyle Larson.

“Between now and the time I leave office, this person is going to be attached to my hip,” Wolff said. “Legally, council decides who that person will be. But I hope that the rest of the council will see this particular process and the work that we do here as valid and take the person we find.”

Wolff has asked people interested in the job to shadow him at City Hall on a Wednesday or Thursday to get a feel for how the meetings run and the time commitment involved.

Being able to fulfill the time commitment obviously was a big issue for the panelists, too. Each of the seven candidates was grilled about being able to devote the majority of their time to council work as Wolff noted that in his first full term his office logged 30,000 e-mails, 8,500 phone calls and attended 2,200 meetings.

But with Rowe, the biggest issue could be a potential conflict of interest with his wife’s employment at Carter Burgess, which would prevent him from being able to vote on some large projects such as the San Antonio International Airport expansion and potentially on portions of the San Antonio River Improvements Project.

Rowe said he would avoid even the appearance of any conflicts of interest by recusing himself from discussions and votes involving the city and Carter & Burgess, a consulting firm for engineering, construction management and planning.

“It seems to me Louis brings in more credibility,” said Ken Villano, former president of Citibank in San Antonio. “But every time he chooses to recuse himself, there will be an impact on the district by not being represented.”

Yet, his experience with SARA, the Alamo Area Council of Governments, the Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce and several charitable organizations prevailed. It didn’t hurt that he said he would carry out the agenda Wolff has set for the district.

“I would sit down with Kevin and say, ‘OK, what are the projects we need to keep on track,'” Rowe said. “And then I would ask what we need to get done over the next 18 months that hasn’t been started.”

Fritz also said she would follow Wolff’s path and try to keep the district’s interests in mind while working across the dais on city projects.

“I get a sense that the biggest challenge as a city council person is to realize it takes a consensus to achieve anything,” she said. “The council as a whole is representing the city. If you hold fast to what will benefit your district and not the whole city, you won’t get anything done.”

MPO Chair: "Those people can afford the tolls"

In an outrageous display of bias and class warfare, Chairwoman Sheila McNeil who chairs the MPO Board that will take a vote to toll 281 and shift tax money to build toll lanes on 281/1604 on December 3, proclaims to her constituents that “those people can afford the toll roads. The average income up there is $300,000 a year.” The City of San Antonio’s web site says the per capita income in District 9 is only $31,000! What a lie! She’s fine voting to toll the northside, just not in her backyard!

See it on YouTube below.

McNeil attended a cozy, closed door meeting at Valero Oct 19 that the Chamber of Commerce crowd called to rally the business community to gain approval of the toll roads at the MPO on December 3…a clear conflict of interest for her as MPO CHAIR to participate in such a meeting.

Object to such blatant pandering to the highway lobby by McNeil who then fulfilled her marching orders by Zachry to ram toll roads down her constituents throats and essentially tell them if you can’t afford tolls, you can become a second class citizen and take the congested access roads. I don’t think that’s the kind of equality Dr. King had in mind.

Email the MPO and tell them to VOTE NO TO TOLLS and NO on using TAX MONEY to build toll roads! It’s a TRIPLE TAX!

Larson: Republican Party now the "tolling party" & tolls largest tax increase in TX history!

Bexar County Commissioner Lyle Larson is right about this:
“The Republican Party in Texas will become known as ‘the tolling party,’ and that image will damage the party’s ability to win future elections. ”

AND

Tolls are “the Largest Tax Increase in Texas History.”

But he’s wrong about the battle over toll roads being over if the MPO votes to approve tolls Dec. 3. There’s no policy, law, or contract that’s approved that cannot also be undone. The taxpayers through our elected officials and at the ballot box ALWAYS have the FINAL say! This is no time to sound defeated!

Larson blasts MPO for ‘secrecy,’ says battle to stop toll roads in Bexar County is ‘probably over.’
By Jim Forsyth
WOAI Radio
11/16/07

Long time toll road opponent Lyle Larson says the proposal that the Metropolitan Planning Organization will vote on next month, to begin the process of building new toll lanes on US Highway 281 north of Loop 1604, amounts to the ‘largest tax increase in the history of Texas,’ and unlike other tax increases which are approved by elected representatives, because the MPO is unelected, there is nothing Texans can do to stop it, 1200 WOAI news reports.

The Bexar County Commissioner made his comments to the Bexar County Republican Men’s Club, and later, to 1200 WOAI news.

“If the vote is successful to use toll equity to build the 281 project, I’m afraid there’s nothing we’re going to be able to do to stop it,” he said.

And if the vote is to give the go-ahead to the 281 tolls, as Larson expects will happen, he warns that is just the beginning.

“Then, God knows what else they’re going to toll. There’s a lot of projects they’re looking at.”

Larson expressed a concern that the Republican Party in Texas will become known as ‘the tolling party,’ and that image will damage the party’s ability to win future elections. He says the vast majority of Texans disapprove of the aggressive toll road building policy promoted by Governor Perry and Texas Department of Transportation Chairman Ric Williamson.

He also blasted the MPO for its ‘secrecy’ and said the unelected agency has a responsibility to lay out for the public the details of the contract agreement on the 281 tolls it will vote on December 3. TxDOT is using a legal ruse to avoid revealing the contents of the contract. It refers to the proposal as a ‘draft,’ while local officials have said the plan up for a vote next month as ‘the final agreement.’

“There’s a lot of things that are built into the contracts that we are unaware of, especially when it comes to building other roads that would potentially compete with the toll lanes for capacity,” he said.

Larson said if that language is in the 281 toll contract, it could prohibit the state from funding any improvements on Blanco Road, Stone Oak Parkway, of Bulverde Road, allowing those routes to deteriorate to make the toll lanes look more attractive to motorists.

1200 WOAI news revealed exclusively more than a month ago that the contract to build State Highway 130 from Marion to Georgetown allows the state to ‘consider’ lowing the speed limit on Interstate 35, to encourage more drivers to take the toll road, and fill the pockets of toll road contractor Cintra Zachry.

Larson warns that next month’s vote of the unelected MPO is probably the last time toll roads can be avoided.

“The only people then that could stop this would be people at the upper level of state government,” Larson said. “I don’t see them doing that in the future.”

Larson also revealed that in addition to the 17 cent a mile toll on the roughly four mile stretch, it will also cost you 50 cents to drive though the new Loop 1604/US 281 cloverleaf which is part of the project.

© 2007 WOAI.com: www.radio.woai.com

Toll roads require massive tax subsidies…a TRIPLE TAX in the end

Link to article here. As if a new tax on driving while paying $3 at the pump isn’t bad enough, this article outlines one of our top complaints…the MASSIVE tax subsidies that will be pumped into these financially risky toll roads. So you’ve already paid taxes to build 281 & 1604, additional tax money will be dumped into building the toll lanes, and then you’ll have to pay a THIRD tax, a toll tax, to drive on it!

Subsidizing toll roads
By Pat Driscoll
Express-News
November 27, 2007
Something that might not get enough attention in the toll-road debate is the matter of public subsidies, so let’s take a look.

Tollroads2.jpg

Texas Department of Transportation officials knew years ago that most toll roads wouldn’t be able to pay for themselves. To put it in DOT-speak, “Few projects are 100 percent toll viable.” To put it in taxpayer terms, public money on top of toll fees is needed to help pay for most of them.

Sure enough, in San Antonio where traffic hasn’t reached the same frenzied “Where-do-I-pay-to-get-out-of-this?” level seen in Dallas and Houston, none of the 70 miles of planned toll roads are wholly toll viable, early studies show. That includes U.S. 281 and Loop 1604, long viewed as the most lucrative projects.

A 2004 analysis said a then-planned 22-mile startup system is just 28 percent toll viable:

The local picture changed in 2005 when Cintra of Spain and Zachry Construction Corp. of San Antonio said they could build a 47-mile toll system on U.S. 281 and Loop 1604 without any public funds. Though no details were released, officials said the firms could do what TxDOT couldn’t because they had more ready capital to invest.

So TxDOT went ahead and broke ground on a three-mile section of 281, and hoped to get back its $77 million from a private concession deal being negotiated for all 47 miles.

But a lawsuit from critics stopped U.S. 281 work so more environmental study could be done, and before it was finished Senate Bill 792 nixed concession possibilities. Now 281 will be financed publicly rather than privately, a move cemented by local toll officials wanting to apply “reasonable” caps to toll fees.

But that means U.S. 281 will have to be subsidized.

The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, the agency now developing the 281 project, won’t release the latest financial model but says $69 million in public funds is needed to help build the first four miles, plus $43 million more is needed for the next four miles and another $83 million for five interchange ramps at Loop 1604.

“There isn’t surplus revenue in the case of 281,” authority Director Terry Brechtel told her board last month.

To develop all of the U.S. 281 tollway, Brechtel on Monday will ask the Metropolitan Planning Organization to shift around some of the $325 million in public money earmarked for local toll projects.

Here’s a breakdown on where the subsidies and toll-backed bonds could go:

    U.S. 281 from Loop 1604 to Comal County
  • $112.2 million in Texas Mobility Funds
  • $363.5 million in toll bonds

Five ramps linking U.S. 281 and Loop 1604

  • $82.6 million in Texas Mobility Funds
  • $61.4 million in toll bonds

Loop 1604 from Texas 151 to Northwest I-10

  • $63.2 million in Texas Mobility Funds
  • $382.9 million in toll bonds

Loop 1604 between Northwest I-10 and U.S. 281

  • $67 million in Texas Mobility Funds
  • $193.9 million in toll bonds

Total

  • $325 million in Texas Mobility Funds
  • $1 billion in toll bonds

NE Partnership, small city mayors, against current toll proposals

Link to article here. These comments by the Northeast Mayors will be interpreted by TxDOT as an endorsement of the toll roads. TxDOT always claims they’re NOT tolling existing roads, yet every single toll lane in the plans for 281/1604 will toll existing lanes/right of way that we drive on today, toll-free. Not even half of the toll roads on 281/1604 have adjacent non-toll expressway lanes, which the mayors said they may support (only about 12 miles of the 47 miles of toll lanes will have a non-toll expressway option). The rest of the project area will only have frontage roads as the non-toll option, clearly NOT an expressway and it can be easily slowed with stoplights.

When I questioned many of the Mayors after the meeting at Retama, they all opposed tolling any existing lanes or right of way already paid for once by the taxpayers indicating they oppose the current toll projects as proposed. Their comments certainly don’t qualify as a ringing endorsement of the plans to toll existing FREEways all over Texas. The MOST CRITICAL factor to these smaller cities will be the non-compete clauses in the toll roads which will prohibit expansion of any free roads surrounding the tollways. This could bring their cities to a state of gridlock for the next 30 years! TxDOT is keeping any non-compete provisions SECRET, yet they’re asking the MPO, which is being kept in the dark, to cast a final vote to approve the toll projects.

Councilman Weeper is rather disingenuous saying he hasn’t received a peep in opposition to the toll roads only 400 in favor. We helped publicize the highway lobby’s stealth campaign to lobby for approval of the toll plans. The plan was hatched in a closed-door meeting at Valero October 19. Expressions of support from those who will financially benefit from the toll roads is hardly a legitimate indicator of public support! It’s an obvious conflict of interest! Weeper has since received over 900 emails in opposition to toll roads…in case the 2,000+ who turned out in opposition at the public hearings weren’t sufficient!

Opposition to toll roads grows in NE Partnership
November 20, 2007
By Edmond Ortiz
Staff Writer
The Herald – News

The Northeast Partnership for Economic Development is providing its input on toll roads. Judging from comments made by attending elected officials at the partnership’s Nov. 8 meeting at Retama Park, the coalition of Metrocom and Seguin leaders is inclined not to join the toll road bandwagon.

The transportation policy board of the San Antonio-Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization will vote Dec. 3 on the toll equity plan that is being developed by the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority.

The equity plan contains financing terms for planned toll road projects that would cover Loop 1604 from Interstate 10 to Texas 151, and U.S. 281 from 1604 to the Comal County line.

Some Metrocom cities had no representation at the Northeast Partnership’s luncheon, but top officials who were there said they and their constituents see toll roads as double taxation.

“I’ve seen over 400 emails in support of the 281 toll, none in opposition. Since I represent over 334,000 residents on the MPO, I felt it’s my duty to encourage citizens to vote their desires,” said Selma City Councilman William Weeper, the partnership’s representative with the planning organization.

Selma Mayor Jim Parma, who chairs the partnership, asked for a roll call of attending mayors to arrive at a consensus. Parma, Al Suarez of Converse, Henry Edwards of Live Oak, Joe Medinger of Universal City and Jay Feibelman of Garden Ridge all expressed concerns with the idea of toll roads.

“I’d support tolls except for any existing roads taxpayers have already paid for,” Feibelman said. “If you want to build two extra lanes on one side of 1604 and two other lanes on the other side and if I have a choice between those toll lanes and the free highway, that’s fine.”

“I’ve heard from some constituents. The Live Oak City Council will consider this issue later, but I can’t see paying for roads twice,” Edwards said.

“I don’t like the concept of toll roads, but I’m with Mayor Feibelman. If I have a choice between those and free highway, that’s good,” Parma said.

“We need to keep free access to certain roads, but you know it’s natural. The minute a freeway opens, it’s clogged,” Medinger said. The Universal City mayor touted methods of alternate travel to help alleviate vehicular/passenger transit such as using mass transportation.

“When I go to meetings in downtown (San Antonio), I take VIA so I don’t hassle with gas or parking. It’s just part of the bigger solution,” he added.

Bexar County Precinct 4 Commissioner Tommy Adkis-son reiterated his general opposition to toll roads.

“I’ll continue to insist we see the best possible proposal,” Adkisson added.

Hollywood Park & local cities have power to stop toll projects

Margaret Byfield of Stewards of the Range is an expert in using local government to fend off overreaching and overbearing state and federal government. Local government coordination is at the fingertips of ANY local unit of government willing to flex its muscles. For all the cries for local control, this one is a sure-fire way to make it happen….it’s the LAW!

Link to article here.

Could Hollywood Park stop the 281 North toll road project?
North Central News
November 19, 2007

Image

San Antonio Toll Party and Texans United for Reform and Freedom Founder and President Terri Hal addresses the Hollywood Park City Council. Photo by Eva Ruth Moravec

By Eva Ruth Moravec
Staff Writer
Some citizens following toll roads issue have recently claimed, and to some extent proven, that individual cities and groups of cities can stop toll road projects that affect them by demanding to be involved in the process.

The town of Hollywood Park could be the next to try.

“I thought it would be a good idea for her to come out,” said Hollywood Park Mayor Richard McIlveen at a recent city council meeting where he introduced SA Toll Party and Texans United for Reform and Freedom Founder and President Terri Hall. “We need to start thinking ahead.”

Hall attended the meeting at the urging of TURF’s Treasurer, Hollywood Park resident Sudie Sartor.

According to Hall’s presentation, a city—specifically, Hollywood Park—affected by the toll road—specifically, the U.S. Highway 281 North toll road project—could effectively tattle on the Texas Department of Transportation to the federal government and stop the toll process here dead in its tracks.

TxDOT should have included Hollywood Park in its long-completed environmental assessment, Hall said, since the city will likely experience more cut-through traffic, an increase in accidents and lower sales taxes and property taxes.

Moreover, the Texas Statutes Local Government Code, which all local governments follow, encourages coordination and thus provides local governments with armory to attack TxDOT, Hall said.

“If you demand coordination, that will require another study, and that will stop the toll project,” she said. “We have got to stop this now. It really just adds up to more economic damage.”

McIlveen said he isn’t sure what the city council will do with Hall’s information. She advised the body and citizens to write a letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which approves environmental assessments on projects like the U.S. 281 toll project, and “include what you thought was inadequate,” said Hall.

“We need to get the city attorney’s interpretation,” McIlveen said. “Obviously, the residents can do whatever they want, but we have to run it through our legal department.”

TxDOT Spokeswoman Laura Lopez said since the project only required an environmental assessment, and not an environmental impact statement, then the coordination clause doesn’t hold true.

“This far in the process, it can’t be stopped that way,” she said.

Stewards of the Range, a group dedicated to legislation on private property rights in America, has determined that the “coordination clause” is valid no matter what the study’s name is.

“The law is really clear, it says that they have to coordinate with the local government,” said Margaret Byfield, Executive Director for Stewards of the Range. “The National Environmental Policy Act is what mandates how environmental assessments and impact statements are done, and that statute says they have to coordinate.”

Byfield’s group has been involved with the city of Bartlett and others’ efforts to stop the Trans-Texas Corridor. Bartlett and others have used the “coordination clause” to stop TxDOT there and demand to be a partner by forming a commission. However, Lopez said the TTC 1-35 project is undergoing an environmental impact statement process, not environmental assessment process.

Moreover, Lopez said Hollywood Park was invited to be involved in the process through quadrant meetings and stakeholder meetings, but added that the city won’t feel impacts from the toll road project that ends at the northern border of the city, Loop 1604.

“They [Hollywood Park] should not be affected by it at all. The purpose of adding capacity is to add more lanes for drivers not to have to go through any shortcuts,” she said, “so there should be no impact whatsoever.”

Hollywood Park already experiences cut-through traffic by drivers who want to avoid the U.S. 281/Loop 1604 interchange. After Hall spoke, council discussed ways to limit cut-through traffic in the city, as a separate agenda item. Further action will be taken in the future.

To solve the interchange issue, the toll road plan will include ramps that will directly connect the two roads, but the ramps won’t be built for years after the toll project begins, and will be tolled.

Byfield said that the skepticism about Hall’s plan is because “local governments haven’t really understood how involved they should be in the process, and TxDOT’s not real happy that some of the local governments are realizing this. They’re going to try to avoid it to the best of their ability.”

The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority is finalizing plans for the 281 North Toll Road project and will seek funding from the Metropolitan Planning Organization on Dec. 3. After that, three bidding teams will prepare entries for the project, and a winner will be selected next spring.

ARMA Spokesman Leroy Alloway said that his organization invited Hollywood Park council members to public meetings and that they were given the opportunity to be involved.

McIlveen said he wasn’t sure if an action item on the subject would be on the agenda for the next council meeting, scheduled for Dec. 18.