Buchanan: “GOP subsidiary of U.S Chamber of Commerce” and “worships at the church of GDP”

Link to Drudge Report here.

You can always count on Pat Buchanan to speak his mind and to jump headlong into the waters of controversy. Apparently, his new book delivers just that. Here’s what jumped out at me in the article:

The Republican Party, a wholly owned subsidiary of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is in the grip of a cult called “Economism.” It is all about money now. The GOP worships at the “Church of GDP”

AND

Powerful Mexican and U.S. elites seek to erase America’s borders and merge the United States and Mexico into a “North American Union.”

Jaime Castillo: Trans-Texas Corridor has no hope as long as secrecy reigns

Link to article here.

Trans-Texas Corridor has no hope as long as secrecy reigns
By Jaime Castillo
San Antonio Express-News
08/20/2006

It has gotten to the point where you don’t know whether to pity Gov. Rick Perry and the toll road zealots in this state or arm some of their equally scary foes with pitchforks and torches to storm the governor’s mansion.

And I say that as someone who is willing to give Perry and company the benefit of the doubt and agree that new funding mechanisms like tollways should be part of the state’s solution to future highway needs.

But the way state transportation officials are approaching the Trans-Texas Corridor, a 50-year plan to produce a statewide network of toll roads and rail and utility lines, invites only two explanations:

Either they aren’t smart enough to pass the TAKS, the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills, we give schoolchildren every year, or they’re arrogant beyond belief.

I don’t think it’s the former. Perry hasn’t gotten this far by being all hair and no cattle, and the group awarded the first phase of the huge highway contract, Cintra-Zachry, is a marriage of two highly successful and profitable companies.

So, I’m going to buy a vowel and go with the “A” word.

And it goes beyond the usual gripes about the $7 billion superhighway, which include gobbling up vast amounts of private land and turning over the infrastructure to be run by private interests.

The biggest problem the public should have with this deal is the secrecy in which it has been put together.

Cintra, a Spain-based company, and its minority partner, Zachry Construction Corp. of San Antonio, are fighting tooth and nail in court to keep the financial aspects of the arrangement out of the public eye.

And it’s a posture Cintra continued last week when the Dallas Morning News reported that Perry’s former liaison to the Legislature, Dan Shelley, had gone back to work for the highway builder, this time as a lobbyist.

Two years ago, it came to light that Shelley had worked as a consultant for the company prior to being hired by the governor’s office. State officials deny the arrangement had anything to do with Cintra being awarded the corridor contract a few months later.

So what is Shelley’s or Cintra’s response to the latest news unearthed by the Dallas Morning News?

Silence. In the newspaper’s words, “A call to Mr. Shelley seeking comment was returned by an Austin spokeswoman for Madrid-based Cintra, who said that Mr. Shelley’s contract with the company prohibits him from discussing his work with reporters.”

Despite this arrogance, Perry and state highway officials push ahead with the belief that tolls and private involvement in public roads are merely a dose of bad-tasting medicine that will relieve the symptoms of future traffic congestion.

With some justification, Perry has even invited his opponents in November’s crowded gubernatorial race to come up with an alternative or be quiet.

“If someone has a better idea … please lay out the plan,” Perry was quoted as saying in Sunday’s Austin American-Statesman.

Here’s a plan, Mr. Governor: If you want to have a chance at getting public support for the Trans-Texas Corridor, either call on Cintra-Zachry to stop being so secretive or ask it to stop bidding on public contracts.

Are we inviting border violence to San Antonio through toll roads agreements & increased foreign trade?

Headline: Southern border sheriffs outgunned by drug cartels (link to article here)

Headline: Texas Sheriffs Say Terrorists Entering US from Mexico (link here)

Headline: Chinese set their sights on Kelly AFB (see article below)

These are just two recent headlines and they demonstrate how toll agreements and trade agreements may be inviting border violence to San Antonio. With hundreds of thousands of containers arriving at the Port of San Antonio (formerly known as Kelly USA) without ANY prior inspection by US customs or officials (read more on containers here), it opens the door to all sorts of smuggling operations.

With sheriffs already seeing criminal smuggling of terrorists into the country via drug cartels, and with the trade agreements and toll plans in place to allow exponential growth in foreign trade (mostly to benefit China), security and our way of life may be threatened since criminals exploit such openings regardless of the assurances and precautions taken by those playing by the rules.
Read these and decide for yourself…

China sets sights on Kelly AFB
American Free Press
By Mike Blair
August 14, 2006

The Chinese are eyeing facilities in Texas to further their economic invasion of the United States.

Negotiations are under way for communist Beijing to utilize as a “logistics hub” the former Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, which was closed in 1995 during the Clinton administration’s base reduction program.

If the deal is consummated the Chinese will also gain access to two major Texas ports at Corpus Christi and Houston on the Texas coast of the Gulf of Mexico, an 11,000-foot-long airstrip, which is part of the Kelly base facilities, rail links with railcar switching facilities and links with five interstate highways. The Chinese are keenly interested in the deal because the San Antonio base will help facilitate its trade with Mexico.

San Antonio will give China access to a highway corridor along I-35, linking San Antonio to Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, which is just across the border from Laredo in west Texas.

Nuevo Laredo is a major staging ground for Mexican drug cartels, which have fostered an atmosphere of lawlessness in the city. Almost daily people, including police, are shot in the streets. In addition, frequent clashes occur between drug smugglers and U.S. Border Patrol and state and local police on the U.S. side of the border in Laredo.

There have also been reports that Chinese military units have been operating with Mexican army troops, who assist the drug smugglers and have made incursions into the United States.

“San Antonio is a strategic site for commerce between China and the United States and for the exportation of Chinese products to Mexico and Latin America,” Zhou Ming, general director of the Chinese State Agency of Promotions and Chinese Investments, said after a Chinese delegation visited San Antonio last year, according to a report in the Spanish-language newspaper Rumbo, which reports on activities in Mexico and U.S. border states.

Like most Chinese industrial, investment and commerce kingpins, Ming has ties to the People’s Liberation Army, which controls most industry in China with much of the profits going to build up the Chinese military.

Considerable slave labor is used, making it impossible for U.S. workers to compete.

A year ago, San Antonio Mayor Phil Hardberger and other municipal officials traveled to China to promote the former air base facilities, now renamed the San Antonio Port Authority.

The mayor’s office is working with the Port Authority, the Free Trade Alliance San Antonio and the San Antonio based Omega Group International, which maintains offices in Austin, Texas, San Francisco, Mexico City and Beijing and Qingdao, China.

According to Rumbo, Omega International sponsored visits by Chinese officials last year to San Antonio. J.J. Saulino, press secretary to Hardberger, told AFP that the mayor is interested in the project and traveled to Guangdong province in China to promote it.

Jorge Canavati, vice president of the San Antonio Port Authority, claimed the Rumbo article was “not accurate” and abrasively brushed off questions about the effort to get the Chinese into the former U.S. air base facilities.

The former air base, often referred to as a “dry port” or an “inland port,” because it is not a coastal facility or located on a navigable waterway, “has no limits for the products, from toys to heavy equipment [from China],” Vivian Lee, president of the Omega Group, was quoted by Rumbo as saying.

AFP was told by Rogello Garcia, a spokesman for the Free Trade Alliance San Antonio, that a Chinese delegation was in San Antonio last spring to further work out details of the project.

Kelly Air Force Base was opened in 1916 as a training facility. Nearby Lackland Air Force Base was a spin-off from Kelly. The Texas Air National Guard 149th Fighter Wing still utilizes the facility, along with the Air Force Reserve 433rd Airlift Wing.

A spokesperson with the Port Authority told AFP that the base has been used to repair and maintain C-5A Galaxy transport planes, which are the largest aircraft in the Air Force. The base has an 11,000-foot runway to accommodate the C-5A, which the military shares with the Port Authority.

In addition to the airstrip, the Port Authority has a 1,200-acre yard operated by the Union Pacific Railroad. The Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railroad is also linked to the inland port. A retired Air Force intelligence officer told AFP that taking over the San Antonio base would likely streamline Chinese exports to the United States and would give them access to ports in Houston and Corpus Christi on the Gulf coast. The Chinese already control the Panama Canal, through the Hutchison-Whampoa Company, and maintain a major airfield and port facility at Freeport, Bahamas, where Hutchison-Whampoa has a contract through the Bush administration to provide security for container ships bound for U.S. ports on the East Coast.

Chinese state-owned shipping company Cosco has taken over port facilities and warehousing space at the California ports of Los Angeles, San Francisco and Long Beach. This is one of the reasons cited for China’s interest in the San Antonio inland port, as it has extensive space available for constructing warehouse buildings. According to Port Authority sources, a 108,800-square-foot warehouse facility has already been built at the former base at a cost of $5 million and a slightly smaller 102,400-squarefoot building has also been built.

Best known for his ground-breaking work exposing the U.S. government’s abandonment of American POWs and MIAs in Korea and Vietnam, Mike Blair specializes in military affairs and gunowners’ rights, Blair was cited by Project Censored for having uncovered the top “most censored” story of 1990—a scheme to scuttle the Bill of Rights in the name of “fighting crime.” ________________________________
Texas Sheriffs Say Terrorists Entering US from Mexico
By Kevin Mooney
CNSNews.com
August 21, 2006

(CNSNews.com) – The chief law enforcement officers of several Texas counties along the southern U.S. border warn that Arabic-speaking individuals are learning Spanish and integrating into Mexican culture before paying smugglers to sneak them into the United States. The Texas Sheriffs’ Border Coalition believes those individuals are likely terrorists and that drug cartels and some members of the Mexican military are helping them get across the border.

Sheriff Sigifredo Gonzalez of Zapata County, Texas told Cybercast News Service that Iranian currency, military badges in Arabic, jackets and other clothing are among the items that have been discovered along the banks of the Rio Grande River. The sheriff also said there are a substantial number of individuals crossing the southern border into the U.S. who are not Mexican. He described the individuals in question as well-funded and able to pay so-called “coyotes” – human smugglers – large sums of money for help gaining illegal entry into the U.S.

Although many of the non-Mexican illegal aliens are fluent in Spanish, Gonzalez said they speak with an accent that is not native.

“It’s clear these people are coming in for reasons other than employment,” Gonzalez said.

That sentiment is shared by Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.).

“For years, Muslims and other ‘Special Interest Aliens’ from places other than Mexico have been streaming into the U.S. across our porous border,” Tancredo told Cybercast News Service. “These people are not paying $50,000 or more a head just to ‘take jobs no American will do.’

“Terrorists are working round the clock to infiltrate the United States,” he added. “Congress and this administration must address this gaping hole in our national security and they must do it now.”

Patch with Arabic lettering lion’s head and paratrooper wingsSome of the more high profile pieces of evidence pointing to terrorist infiltration of the U.S. have been uncovered in Jim Hogg County, Texas, which experiences a high volume of smuggling activity, according to local law enforcement.

“We see patches on jackets from countries where we know al Qaeda to be active,” Gonzalez explained.

The patches appear to be military badges with Arabic lettering. One patch in particular, discovered this past December, caught the attention of federal homeland security officials, according to Gonzalez and local officials familiar with the investigation.

Patch with Arabic lettering depicting airplane flying toward towersSheriff Wayne Jernigan of Valverde County, Texas, told members of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee in March about one patch that read “midnight mission” and displayed an airplane flying over a building heading towards a tower. Translators with DHS have said some of the various phrases and slogans on the items could mean “martyr,” “way to eternal life,” or “way to immortality.”

Gonzalez told the House International Relations Subcommittee on International Terrorism and Nonproliferation in July that the terrorists are getting smarter.

“To avoid apprehension, we feel many of these terrorists attempt to blend in with persons of Hispanic origin when entering the country.” Gonzalez stated. “We feel that terrorists are already here and continue to enter our country on a daily basis.”

Sheriff Arvin West of Hudspeth County, Texas, told Cybercast News Service that he believes some Mexican soldiers are operating in concert with the drug cartels to aid the terrorists.

“There’s no doubt in my mind,” he said, “although the Mexican government and our government adamantly deny it.”

Statistics made available through the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) show more than 40,000 illegal aliens from countries “Other Than Mexico,” designated as OTMs, were apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol in the period ranging from October 2003 to June 2004, as they attempted to cross the southwestern border. An overview of border security challenges produced through the office of Texas Gov. Rick Perry indicates that almost 120,000 OTMs were apprehended while attempting to cross into the state from January through July 2005.

Local authorities are particularly concerned about illegal aliens arriving from Special Interest Countries (SICs) where a radical version of Islam is known to flourish. Perry’s office cites Iraq, Iran, Indonesia and Bangladesh among those countries. A Tancredo spokesperson said the list also includes Afghanistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and Yemen.

As Cybercast News Service previously reported an internal audit of DHS that combines the number of illegal aliens arriving from SICs with the documented instances of illegal aliens arriving from countries identified as being state sponsors of terrorism (SSTs) yields a grand total of over 90,000 such illegal aliens who have been apprehended during the five year period from fiscal year 2001 to fiscal year 2005.

The border security report delivered by Perry’s office focuses attention on the “Triborder region” of Latin America, which spans an area between Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay.

“The Triborder Region is a focal point of Islamic extremism,” the report states. “Al Qaeda leadership plans to use criminal alien smuggling organizations to bring terrorist operatives across the border into the U.S.”

Carlos Espinosa, a press spokesman for Tancredo, said his office is aware of a training camp in Brazil that actually teaches people from outside of Latin America how they can assimilate into the Mexican culture.

“They come up as illegal aliens and disguise themselves as potential migrant workers,” Espinosa said.

Ex-Perry aide goes to work for Cintra after securing a secret contract

Link to article here.

This story also appeared in the Dallas Morning News, the San Antonio Express-News, and the Houston Chronicle.

Trans-Texas Corridor firm hires ex-Perry aide
Associated Press
August 18, 2006

DALLAS — Republican Gov. Rick Perry’s former liaison to the Legislature is working once again for the Spanish company that won the rights to develop the state’s $7 billion Trans-Texas Corridor toll road project.Lobbyist Dan Shelley worked for the firm as a consultant just before he went to the governor’s office, a connection first revealed in 2004.

State officials denied any connection between that circumstance and the decision, three months later, to award Cintra-Zachry the huge highway contract. Now Shelley has left the governor’s office, and he and his daughter have large contracts to lobby for the road builder, The Dallas Morning News reported today.

This week, Shelley had planned to take four state lawmakers on a four-day, all-expense-paid trip to Canada. But the trip was abruptly postponed by the state transportation department after the newspaper asked questions about it.

A call to Shelley seeking comment was returned by Rossanna Salazar, an Austin spokeswoman for Madrid-based Cintra, who said Shelley’s contract with the company prohibits him from discussing his work with news reporters. Salazar confirmed that Shelley was helping to arrange the fact-finding trip to visit a Cintra toll road near Toronto.

“Dan Shelley was going to cover those costs” for the lawmakers’ expenses, Salazar said. “He would have had to publicly report those costs to the Texas Ethics Commission.”

Texas law does not restrict former gubernatorial staffers from lobbying, but Perry has instituted his own rule for former high-level staffers. They can lobby the Legislature and state agencies but are banned from lobbying the governor’s office for a year, or until the end of the first legislative session after they’ve left, whichever is longer.

“Governor Perry has the strongest ethics policy that any Texas governor has ever had,” said Kathy Walt, Perry’s spokeswoman.

The Canadian trip was to include a visit to Cintra’s state-of-the-art Highway 407 Electronic Toll Road. Interviews with Ontario government officials also were scheduled.

Among the lawmakers included were Rep. Mike Krusee, the Round Rock Republican who heads the House Transportation Committee, and three members of the Senate committee that writes the state budget: Democrats Royce West of Dallas and John Whitmire of Houston, along with Republican Kim Brimer of Fort Worth.

Several top employees of the Texas Department of Transportation also were to go on the trip, but the agency was to pay their way. Transportation department officials said they postponed the trip because a more pressing duty arose.

Though the payment of trip expenses for legislators by Cintra would have been legal, companies stand to gain by having lawmakers’ undivided attention for several days, said Tom “Smitty” Smith, director of Public Citizen of Texas, a watchdog group. Lawmakers should use their campaign funds for such expenses, Smith said.

“That’s preferable from taking money from corporations that stand to make billions in the continuation of this Trans-Texas Corridor project,” he said.

Shelley resigned his state job in September and struck a lobbying deal with Cintra worth between $50,000 and $100,000 to work from March through the end of this year. His daughter and lobbying partner, Jennifer Shelley-Rodriguez, will earn between $25,000 and $50,000 from the company over the same period, state records show.

The Trans-Texas Corridor is Perry’s vision for a statewide network of toll roads, rail lines and utility lines to improve transportation for the next 50 years. Cintra-Zachry won the development rights in 2004 to the first corridor section, which will parallel Interstate 35.

The corridor has become an issue in the governor’s race, as independent candidate Carole Keeton Strayhorn has tried to capitalize on opposition from landowners and others to the project.

When Shelley worked for Cintra before, he never registered as a lobbyist. Instead, he worked nine months as an unregulated “consultant” trying to generate business for the company in Texas.

At the time, the governor’s office said Shelley was never paid by the company, because his fees were to be based on any deals closed. They said that when he left the firm before the contract was complete, he gave up the right to such fees.

The director of Texans for Public Justice, a group that tracks money in politics, said the Shelley case demonstrates that the policy and the law both need tightening to prevent “the revolving lobby door.”

Bush delays foreign ownership of U.S. airlines

Link to article here.

Bush delays foreign airline ownership
By Leslie Miller
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – The Bush administration is delaying a plan to give foreigners more say in running U.S. airlines. The House and Senate voted earlier this year to prevent the administration from going forward with the plan.

Opponents say the administration doesn’t have the constitutional right to undo a law that restricts foreign ownership of U.S. airlines to 25 percent. They also say it will undermine safety, security, national defense and U.S. jobs.

Jeffrey Shane, the Transportation Department‘s undersecretary for policy, said Tuesday that the Bush administration recognizes it needs to spend more time discussing it with Congress.

The Bush administration also wants to sign an aviation treaty with the European Union to liberalize commercial aviation between the U.S. and Europe.

“The Europeans have suggested in their minds that there’s a linkage between a final rule and their willingness to sign a treaty,” Shane said.

Shane said the administration planned to issue a final rule this month allowing more foreign control. The delay will prevent EU ministers of transport from reviewing it at their Oct. 12 meeting, he said.

The treaty would let European and U.S. airlines fly wherever they want between European cities and the U.S., and charge whatever they want.

Shane listed the benefits of the proposed treaty as “a lot more competition, a lot more variety of service in the trans-Atlantic marketplace, more destinations served more conveniently, more economic opportunity for the airlines on both sides.”

Labor unions and some airlines oppose more foreign control, fearing it would damage U.S. security and cost U.S. jobs.

“I am opposed to the change because it will result in the loss of American jobs, will hurt rural and small communities and could severely jeopardize our safety and security,” said Illinois Rep. Jerry Costello, ranking Democrat on the House aviation subcommittee.

Corridor security threat: Foreign goods traverse all the way to San Antonio or Kansas City before inspection

Link to article here.

This article focuses primarily on the Kansas City interior port, but a previous one mentions the same principle for the Port of San Antonio.

Shipping-Corridor Deal Cuts Heart Out of Heartland
by Phyllis Schlafly
Human Events Online
August 07, 2006

Grass-roots Americans of all parties and economic classes rose up out of their political apathy a few months ago and forced President George W. Bush to reverse his administration’s decision to allow a Middle East government to own America’s major ports. But the push for foreign ownership continues: the next port scheduled to be taken over is Kansas City, Mo.
Even though public schools stopped teaching geography a couple of decades ago, most Americans (especially residents of the Show Me State) are surprised to learn that Kansas City (where the only waves are “amber waves of grain”) is a port. We are also surprised, and shocked, to discover that Mexico will be running its own inspection facility there.

The plan, shrouded in secrecy, has been in the works for at least three years, but it is now coming to light because of the diligent use of Missouri’s Sunshine law by concerned citizens. Joyce Mucci and Francis Semler forced the release of the e-mails from Kansas City to Mexico, including one admitting that “The space (in Kansas City) would need to be designated as Mexican sovereign territory.”

SmartPort representatives are now running away from this written admission, blaming “the problems and pressure the media attention has created.” However, the stubborn sovereignty issue won’t go away; the plan does involve setting up Mexican customs officials in downtown Kansas City.

The mechanism for this deal is a “nonprofit” business economic development corporation called Kansas City SmartPort Inc., whose president is Chris J.F. Gutierrez. The deal calls for Kansas City to lease the valuable property at 1447 Liberty St.

As laid out on SmartPort’s Web site, the plan is to enable products made in China to travel in sealed “containers nonstop from the Far East by way of Mexico,” through “a ships-to-rail terminal at the port of Lazaro Cardenas, Mexico,” then up “the evolving trade corridor” to Kansas City, Mo., where they would have their first inspection.

A Kansas City SmartPort brochure explains further: “Kansas City offers the opportunity for sealed cargo containers to travel to Mexican port cities with virtually no border delays.”

A key purpose of the project is to take jobs away from U.S. longshoremen in Los Angeles and Long Beach, Calif., who earn $140,000 a year, and replace them with Mexican laborers at $10,000 a year. U.S. truck drivers and railroad workers will likewise be replaced by Mexicans.

The port of Lazaro Cardenas, on the west coast of southern Mexico, is controlled by Hutchison Whampoa, the same giant Hong Kong shipping firm that owns the ports at both ends of the Panama Canal. Chinese-made goods will be carried by Kansas City Southern Railway de Mexico directly to Kansas City, where freight will be distributed east and west and on to Canada.

Kansas City Southern was originally a belt railway around Kansas City but, after buying various Mexican rail companies and tracks, KCS controls a 2,600-mile artery from Lazaro Cardenas to Kansas City. KCS President Michael Haverty was one of five U.S. businessmen who met with President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper at their March summit in Cancun, Mexico.

Mexico was at first expected to pay for the big, expensive machines to conduct high-tech gamma-ray screening for drive-through inspections of containers, but Mexico declined the honor. SmartPort has applied for a $1.5 million grant from the U.S. Economic Development Administration (i.e., to get the U.S. taxpayers to pay for the machines).

The Kansas City City Council has already earmarked $2.5 million in loans and $600,000 in direct aid to SmartPort, which would build and own the facility and then sublet it to the Mexican government. The cost could go as high as $6 million because Kansas City has an existing lease that runs through 2045 on the same property with the 107-year-old American Royal, which uses that land for its annual livestock/rodeo/barbecue event.

The last piece in finalizing this project is getting the U.S. State Department to approve the Mexican operation on U.S. soil by signing off on what is called the C-175 document. It has already been approved by U.S. Customs.

Meanwhile, NASCO (North America’s SuperCorridor Coalition Inc.), another nonprofit business organization, has taken on the mission of building an “international, integrated and secure, multimodal transportation system” from Lazaro Cardenas through Kansas City and up to Winnipeg, Canada. This will allow Mexican trucks to haul goods along a 12-lane superhighway through the heartland of the United States.

Supercorridor to Oblivion

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51282



Super-Corridor to oblivion



By Henry Lamb
World Net Daily
July 29, 2006
 

There is growing concern about the proposed “Super-Corridor” from the southern tip of Mexico to Canada. The project, under way for more than a decade, is just now being introduced to the public. And the public doesn’t like what they are hearing. Confusion about the project is rampant because it is still primarily a concept, in the planning stages, and most of the final decisions will not be made for some time. Several very important decisions, however, have already been made.

TheNorth American International Trade Corridor Partnership has officially amalgamated with the North American SuperCorridor Coalition, or NASCO, to promote the development of a trade corridor designed to expedite the flow of trade through the North American continent.

NASCO is a not-for-profit lobbying organization that has received $2.5 million in congressional earmarks from the Department of Transportation to promote the corridor concept. Its 24-member board of directors includes county commissioners from four Texas counties, an Oklahoma state senator and a member of OK-DOT, two officials from the Texas DOT, attorneys, a couple of construction company officials and an official of the U.S.-Mexico Chamber of Commerce. Membership fees range from $500 for an individual up to $25,000 for government entities. Membership includes several U.S. government entities.

NASCO claims that “There are no plans to build a new NAFTA super-highway – it exists today as I-35.” This, however, is at odds with reality.

On Dec. 16, 2004, the Texas Transportation Commission, well represented in NASCO, entered into an agreement with a consortium called based in Spain, with tentacles into several other countries. The Comprehensive Development Agreement is open-ended (up to 50 years) and provides for many options along the way.

The goal is to build and operate a privately funded toll corridor that includes up to 10 lanes of car and truck traffic, rail lines, pipelines and utilities, including communications systems. The current agreement is limited to Texas, but fits nicely into the master plan being advanced by NASCO.

It also fits nicely into the vision of the Council on Foreign Relations’ recent report, “Building a North American Community,” which advocates “unlimited access to each other’s territory” (page 47), including allowing Mexican or Canadian companies to freely enter the United States to compete with U.S. trucking companies, hauling freight between U.S. cities.

This, of course, is essential to the creation of the North American Union, the goal of the Security and Prosperity Partnership. This partnership includes enhanced border crossings for trade and for individuals, using a new SENTRI program being developed by the U.S. Customs Department.

This massive transformation of the United States of America into the North American Union is well under way. It is being implemented with the blessings of the last three presidents, key congressmen, and the most powerful business and professional government leaders.

There’s one small problem: No one asked the American people if they want this transformation.

The entire concept has never been presented to Congress, nor to the American people for reflection, discussion, debate and approval. Instead, powerful lobbying groups, such as NASCO and others, present small segments of the concept wrapped up in a package of financial benefits, and then “sell” the idea in installments. Each installment is a baby step toward the North American Union, which is similar to the European Union – both key elements in the structure of global governance.

The fundamental transformation is to our system of governance; we are moving from the system of representative government set forth in the U.S. Constitution to a system of collaborative policymaking by professional bureaucrats and business leaders. This outcome is precisely what the President’s Council on Sustainable Development called for in its 1993 We Believe Statements:

“We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions; more rapid change; and more sensible use of human, natural and financial resources in achieving our goals.” (Statement No. 8)

What we really need are elected officials who listen to their constituents and refuse to be steamrolled or bought by professional bureaucrats and business leaders.

The Texas Transportation Commission can withdraw from its agreement with Cintra-Zachry at any time. Perhaps the voters in Texas can call for a referendum to see if the people really want this Super-Corridor. The people of Texas could, once again, play a vital role in saving the United States.




Henry Lamb is the executive vice president of the Environmental Conservation Organization and chairman of Sovereignty International.

San Antonio Port Authority actively working with Communist China

Direct link to Human Events Online article here.

Red China Opens NAFTA Ports in Mexico
by Jerome R. Corsi
Human Events Online
Posted Jul 18, 2006

The Port Authority of San Antonio has been working actively with the Communist Chinese to open and develop NAFTA shipping ports in Mexico.

The plan is to ship containers of cheap goods produced by under-market labor in China and the Far East into North America via Mexican ports. From the Mexican ports, Mexican truck drivers and railroad workers will transport the goods across the Mexican border with Texas. Once in the U.S., the routes will proceed north to Kansas City along the NAFTA Super-Highway, ready to be expanded by the Trans-Texas Corridor, and NAFTA railroad routes being put in place by Kansas City Southern. Kansas City Southern’s Mexican railroads has positioned the company to become the “NAFTA Railroad.”

Right now, the cost of shipping and ground transportation can nearly double the total cost of cheap goods produced by Chinese and Far Eastern under-market labor. The plan is to reduce those transportation costs by as much as 50% by using Mexican ports.

Cost-savings will be realized by bringing the goods into the U.S. at mid-continent. Equally important is that the substantially reduced cost of using Mexican labor in the ports and to transport the goods once off-loaded. Mexican workers undercut Longshoremen Union port employees on the docks of Los Angeles and Long Beach, just as Mexican truck drivers undercut the Teamsters and Mexican railroad workers undercut United Transportation Union railroad workers. By using the Mexican ports, the international corporations managing this global trade are able to avoid the U.S. labor union workers who otherwise would unload the ships in west coast ports and transport the Asian containers into the heart of America by U.S. truckers or U.S. railroad ground transport moving east across the Rocky Mountains.

In April 2006, officials of the Port Authority of San Antonio traveled to China with representatives of the Free Trade Alliance San Antonio, the Port of Lazaro Cardenas, and Hutchinson Port Holdings to develop the Mexican ports logistics corridor. The goal of the meetings in China was described by the March 2006 e-newsletter of the Free Trade Alliance San Antonio:

In January of 2006, a collaboration of several logistics entities in the U.S. and Mexico began operation of a new multimodal logistics corridor for Chinese goods entering the U.S. Market. The new corridor brings containerized goods from China on either Maersk or CP Ships service to the Mexican Port of Lazaro Cardenas. There, the containers are off loaded by a new world class terminal operated by Hutchinson Ports based in Hong Kong. The containers are loaded onto the Kansas City Southern Railroad de Mexico where they move in-bound into the U.S. The containers clear U.S. customs in San Antonio, Texas and are processed for distribution.

Hutchinson Whampoa, a diversified company that manages property development and telecommunications companies, with operations in 54 countries and over 200,000 employees worldwide, is also one of the world’s largest port operators. Hutchinson Ports Holding (HPH) owns Panama Ports Co., which operates the ports of Cristobal and Balboa which are located at each end of the Panama Canal. HPH also operates the industrial deepwater port of Lazaro Cardenas in the Mexican State of Michoacan, as well as the Mexican port at Manzanillo, also along the west coast of Mexico, north of Lazaro Cardenas.

The Free Trade Alliance San Antonio was created in 1994 to promote the development of San Antonio’s inland port. The Free Trade Alliance San Antonio and the Port Authority of San Antonio are both members of NASCO, an acronym for the group’s formal name, the North American’s SuperCorridor Coalition, Inc. A Kansas City Star newspaper article posted on the website of the Kansas City SmartPort, another NASCO member, shows the importance of San Antonio’s inland port to the developing NAFTA Super-Highway and NAFTA railroad corridor emerging along Interstate I-35. According to reporter Rick Alm, San Antonio envisions the opening of a Mexican customs office in their inland port, a move that has been pioneered by Kansas City SmartPort:

Under this area’s arrangement [establishing a Mexican customs facility in the Kansas City SmartPort], freight would be inspected by Mexican authorities in Kansas City and sealed in containers for movement directly to Mexican destinations with fewer costly border delays. The arrangement would become even more lucrative when Asian markets that shipped through Mexican ports were figured into the mix. “We applaud the efforts of Kansas City and the Mexican government in developing a Mexican customs facility there,” said Jorge Canavati, marketing director for Kelly USA [former name for San Antonio’s inland port established on the former site of Kelly Air Force Base]. He said a Mexican customs function for KellyUSA “is something that is still far away … We may be looking at that” in the future.

A world map on the North American Inland Ports Network (NAIPN) on the NASCO website graphically highlights in yellow the trade routes from China across the Pacific ocean, to Mexico at the ports of Manzanillo and Lazaro Cardenas, entering the U.S. through San Antonio.

A Free Trade Alliance San Antonio 2005 summary of goals and accomplishments documents the direct involvement of the Bush administration into the development of San Antonio’s inland port NAFTA plans. The following were among the bulleted points:

  • Organized four marketing trips to Mexico and China to promote Inland Port San Antonio and met with prospects. Met with over 50 prospects/leads during these trips.

  • Continued to pursue cross border trucking by advocating a pilot project with at least two major Mexican exporters as potential subjects. Worked with U.S. Department of Transportation, Dept. of Homeland Security and U.S. Trade Representative on this concept.

  • Working with Mexican ports to develop new cargo routes through the Ports of Manzanillo and Lazaro Candenas.

  • San Antonio is on the route of the Trans-Texas Corridor planned to be built along I-35 from Laredo, Tex., on the Mexican Border, north through Dallas, en route to the Oklahoma border.

The development of a China-Mexico trade route reflects a fundamental shift since the passage of NAFTA. At the peak in the mid-1990s, there were some three thousand maquiladoras located in northern Mexico, employing over 1 million Mexicans in low-paying, assembly sweat-shops. Today, even Mexican labor is not cheap enough for the international corporations seeking only to maximize profits. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, that bubble has burst and the maquiladora activity is down over 25 percent from the peak as the international corporations have found even cheaper labor in China.

As the Port of San Antonio evidences, linking NAFTA inland ports with NAFTA super-highways and NAFTA railroads is an important part of the development plan for the emerging global free trade economy. San Antonio officials by working with the communist Chinese to open Mexican ports for NAFTA trade evidence that plan. International capitalists are now determined to exploit cheap Mexican labor, not so much for manufacturing and assembly, but as a means of saving port and transportation costs in the North American market.

The Bush Administration seems on-board with the plan, aiming to increase corporate capital gains in NAFTA markets rather than worrying about the adverse consequences to Mexican low-skilled workers or to the U.S. labor movement that transferring increasing amounts of manufacturing and assembly to China entails.

States embrace the most expensive option: tolls to get their BIG FAT cash pay offs

Link to article here.

It’s not hard to see why government salivates at tolls since it means it’s the most expensive, least efficient means to grow government and fleece the taxpayer. The question is, what are the taxpayers going to do about it? Are we going to allow FAT CAT politicians getting their campaign coffers filled by the highway lobby to sell off America for some foreign money? Our web site is filled with articles about the dangers of America’s addiction to foreign money (read just one here) and how they’ve been collecting so much tax for highways they had money to waste on over 6,000 earmarks in last year’s pork-filled highway bill (read about it here). Think tanks and politicians say get on board the money train, but the grassroots are saing NO WAY! Time for a taxpayer revolt…get ready to clean house in November!
The talking points are always the same, “cash-strapped states turn to tolls to raise revenue for roads.” How about we do a little research on how many of the cash-strapped states had surpluses this year alone? Texas is one of them. With an $8.2 billion surplus (and that figure is rising exponentially), that’s hardly “cash-strapped.”

How ’bout the media do some actual reporting and not just regurgitate press release talking points from the money machine? In Texas alone, their state gas tax revenue has outpaced populationand inflation by more than three times in the last 20 years. So claim after claim in this article is FALSE! Now they’ve got Peter Samuel (father of toll roads, publisher of Toll Road News) repeating Ric Williamson’s talking point, “It’s toll roads or no roads.” And FYI to the reporter, the Austin Toll Party did unseat tollers and so have we. What TxDOT and our federal government are promoting is no “polite form of highway robbery,” it’s tantamount to criminal waste a fraud! Do your homework and report the FACTS instead of being lazy and calling facts a claim.

Cash-strapped states embrace toll roads

As highway funds dwindle, South Carolina eyes revenues from I-95 tolls. Indiana and Texas lease roads to firms.

By Patrik Jonsson | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

June 7, 2006 issue

ATLANTA – America has a freeway problem.

It needs to spend an extra $118.9 billion – above and beyond current state and federal highway funding – to upgrade its roads and bridges through 2022, the Federal Highway Administration estimates. But motorists, already distraught over rising fuel prices, don’t want to foot the bill with higher gasoline taxes. So politicians from Oregon to South Carolina are reviving an old solution: the toll road.

Once seen as harbors of patronage, turnpikes are seeing a roadway renaissance. New technology that allows drivers to buzz through booths at a full clip is changing how Americans perceive their motoring experience, and revealing creative – and profitable – ways to build and maintain roads. Critics say the trend threatens to wreck the egalitarian spirit of highway travel in America by creating a form of travel tiered by wealth.

“There’s clearly a trend for states to look at [tolls] and there’s a lot of money on the table,” says Matt Sundeen, a policy analyst with the National Conference of State Legislatures in Denver. “It’s very alluring, because a lot of states have enormous highway budget shortfalls.”

Politicians are scrambling for new highway funding options because traditional ones are dwindling. Gas taxes raised per mile of interstate highway, for example, have fallen by about half since the 1960s, after accounting for inflation, says the Reason Foundation, a libertarian think tank in Los Angeles. “We have a shortfall between the capacity that’s needed and money that we have to build it,” says Geoffrey Segal, the group’s government reform director.

For many Americans, toll roads, especially with the advent of zip-through lanes, are increasingly appealing – if it eases their morning commute. Sixty percent of Californians said recently they favor toll roads over freeways if they save time, according to Lake Research Partners, a Washington, D.C., market research firm.

As a result, states are making bold moves. South Carolina has petitioned the federal government to turn its swath of I-95 into a toll road. The new I-25 high-speed toll lanes opened last week in Denver. Oregon is considering eliminating its gas tax in favor of making motorists pay for road usage per mile – with the help of toll transponders linked to a GPS system. Atlanta is mulling putting truck tolls on I-285, its crammed perimeter road.

Moreover, states are increasingly looking at an option already popular in Europe and Australia: leasing to a company the right to collect tolls on roads that it maintains. Illinois last week signed legislation that would allow such public-private partnerships. New Jersey is considering leasing out the New Jersey Turnpike. Texas has gone one better, partnering with Spain’s Cintra to build a new highway – the $6 billion, 316-mile Trans-Texas Corridor 35 – expected to open in 2014.

States woke up to the possibility of leasing existing toll roads to private management firms when a partnership of Cintra and Australia’s Macquarie Infrastructure Group agreed to pay $3.85 billion to Indiana for the 157-mile Indiana Toll Road, a year after the same group paid $1.8 billion for the eight-mile-long Chicago Skyway. Some $25 billion worth of public-private toll ventures are under way in at least six states, says the Reason Foundation.

“Right now, Americans are looking at toll roads – or no roads,” says Peter Samuel, editor of Tollroads News, an online newsletter. Yet many projects face “popular suspicion.”

Some critics complain that no-compete clauses in toll deals often include measures to lower speed limits on parallel free roads to drive traffic to the toll road – a polite form of highway robbery, they say.

“When government starts talking about raising tolls, putting in new tolls or selling off tollways, it creates a buzz [among motorists] and it’s certainly not a happy buzz,” says Eric Skrum, a spokesman for the National Motorists Association in Waunakee, Wis.

Protest has bubbled over in some states. Only one Democratic legislator in GOP-dominated Indiana voted for the toll road deal, as complaints rose about selling rights to the road to a foreign concern. In Austin, Texas, activists cobbled together the “Toll Party” to fight new toll roads there. The group claims to have unseated the pro-toll mayor of an Austin suburb.

Toll hogs: World’s largest toll operators hungry for U.S. market

Direct link to part of the second article here. The rest only available through subscription.

Our politicians are drinking the Kool-Aid, folks! Time to send a message Nov 7 nationwide…American infrastructure is NOT for sale! The best quote of a companion article:

“This is just crony capitalism. There’s no way a private entity can run the toll road more cheaply than a public entity…they’ve (private firms) got to make a profit,” Grant Smith, Citizens Action Coalition.

Toll hogs: World’s largest toll operators hungry for U.S. market
By David Tanner
Landline Magazine, for Independent Truckers
July issue

The dinner bell is ringing and private companies are headed to the trough.

If you haven’t heard by now, the main course is America’s infrastructure.

Gracious hosts have already included Illinois and Indiana, whose governors leased toll roads to private investors for up-front cash, cash to make up for growing gaps in their road budgets.

And why wouldn’t the states be gracious hosts, with the Bush administration paving the way in August 2005 with the federal highway funding legislation known as SAFETEA-LU?

And in May of this year, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, in a plan to take pressure off congested highways, called for private investors to take more interest in alternate routes, toll routes, airports and railways.

“Private capital will give those communities willing to embrace it an opportunity to augment public funds in order to complete critical transit and highway projects,” Mineta said in a press release. “We will never succeed in making today’s traffic a thing of the past without the involvement of this nation’s private sector.”

The toll hogs are coming to the trough and they are amassing huge portfolios while accepting the invitation to seats at the dinner table.

The recent private leases of the Chicago Skyway and the Indiana Toll Road – both to Spanish-Australian consortium Cintra-Macquarie – now look like they could just be the appetizer course.

During the bidding process and legislative action in Indiana that paved the way for Cintra-Macquarie to collect tolls for the next 75 years on the 157-mile Indiana Toll Road, another important business deal was brewing in Europe that soon could impact things to come in North America.

The deal, not widely publicized so far in North America, could give a new private investor a spoon to dip into the great melting pot.

Merger would create mega toll company

Two large European infrastructure companies, Abertis of Spain and Autostrade of Italy, announced a planned merger April 23 that would create the world’s largest private toll-road operator.

The reason for the proposed merger: the U.S. infrastructure market, according to a posting on the Abertis Web site, abertis.com.

“The objective is to set up a large European infrastructures operator with the volume and critical mass necessary for tackling operations in strategic markets such as the USA, Latin America and Asia,” Abertis officials stated on the site.

As of press time, Autostrade shareholders were scheduled to vote on the merger June 30. If approved, the merged company will operate under the Abertis name and be based in Barcelona.

In the event of the merger, the new Abertis would have a market capitalization of $30 billion U.S., with an annual revenue of $6 billion, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The merged Abertis would operate 4,130 miles of toll roads in Spain, Italy, France, the United Kingdom and several other countries. The company would also employ more than 20,000 people in 16 countries.

Part of Abertis’ portfolio is paid parking spaces. A subsidiary called Saba manages 91,400 parking spaces in Europe, South America and Africa.

The Italian government is not happy with the announced Abertis-Autostrade merger, according to that country’s top newspapers.

Italian infrastructure minister Antonio Di Pietro told the Italian media that he opposed the merger because it appeared to be an Abertis takeover of the Italian company. But Autostrade shareholders seemed to favor the merger even before the vote in late June, according to BBC News.

Autostrade shareholders bumped a board executive, Vito Gamberale, to a powerless position for reportedly opposing the merger, BBC News reported.

Skyway was first domino to fall

The proposed Abertis-Autostrade partnership, much like the group that’s already operating in North America – Cintra-Macquarie – has every intention of making a profit in the U.S. infrastructure market.

The merged Abertis, according to Forbes, will have a projected cash flow of $19.8 billion by 2014.

Even before the announcement of the merger, Abertis and Autostrade were actively seeking new toll roads to invest in.

Together, and with eyes set on the U.S. market, the new Abertis could well become a major stakeholder in state road building and tolling.

Cintra-Macquarie has led the way as the first foreign consortium to buy into the infrastructure buffet with a $1.83 billion lease of the Chicago Skyway that will last 99 years.

Tolls on the Skyway are expected to increase with the rate of inflation.

That has not been the case so far in Indiana.

Cintra-Macquarie will raise truck tolls on the Indiana Toll Road from $14.85 to $32 by 2010.

State lawmakers saw an increase as being inevitable, so they struck a deal with the Spanish/Australian consortium to phase in the increases instead of allowing the company to take it all in one mouthful.

Macquarie, with roots in the Australian banking industry, promises big returns for its investors, particularly once the U.S. market opens up to more privatization.

Goldman, Sachs & Co. officials in May told a House transportation panel that the U.S. infrastructure market could open up $50 billion to private investors.

Waiter, there’s a fly in the soup

But there’s a stigma attached to being a “foreign” investor in the U.S., despite the fact that numerous U.S. entities and about 80 percent of the country’s port terminals already operate under foreign leadership.

Macquarie may soon list itself as a U.S. company to shed the stigma attached to “foreign” investment in U.S. infrastructure, according to The Australian newspaper.

And, it remains to be seen how easy it will be the lease infrastructure state-by-state. For example, a group of Indiana residents decided they didn’t want to see U.S. infrastructure being leased, so they filed a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of Gov. Daniels’ “Major Moves” transportation plan and the lease of the Indiana Toll Road to Cintra-Macquarie.

That lawsuit had made it to the Indiana Supreme Court at press time.
_____________________
States ring the bell for the toll trough
By David Tanner
Land Line Magazine
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers (Truckers) Association
July 2006

A possible $15 billion privatization deal is in the works for 274 miles of the Illinois Tollway System.

Virginia is planning a $13 billion renovation to add lanes to the 325-mile Interstate 81, and is also planning to lease the Pocahontas Parkway for 99 years to Transurban from Australia for $525 million. The state has already leased the Dulles Greenway to Macquarie Infrastructure Group of Australia.

The Trans-Texas Corridor will require private investment to build and/or expand Interstate 35 and Interstate 69 to bolster a NAFTA corridor.

South Carolina applied in May for the right to toll the 200-mile Interstate 95, joining North Carolina, Virginia, Missouri and other states applying through a federal pilot program to toll existing interstates.

Private investment along the New York Thruway could help rebuild the Tappan Zee Bridge and others for $3 billion.

Lawmakers are proposing tolls on a 33-mile loop in Colorado around Colorado Springs called Springs Toll Road.

Arizona’s first ever toll road could include private investment opportunities in the Casa Grande area.

The South Bay Expressway, a 10-mile toll loop in San Diego, is being built with private dollars by Macquarie Infrastructure Group.

A bill nearing passage in Louisiana would allow the formation of public-private partnerships to build toll roads and bridges. A Nevada lawmaker is touting a similar bill.

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell has praised the lease deals in Illinois and Indiana and said public-private partnerships would help the state’s cash flow for roads.

A New Jersey lawmaker recently withdrew a bill that would have privately leased 49 percent of the interest in the 148-mile New Jersey Turnpike and Garden State Parkway.