TxDOT employee FIRED over 281 fraudulent study

Link to article here. Read more detail about TxDOT’s illegal actions here.

Firing, reprimands follow tainted study for 281 tollway

By Patrick Driscoll – Express-News

11/26/2008
Two months after a lawsuit revealed a conflict of interest that spoiled yet another environmental study for the U.S. 281 tollway, the Texas Department of Transportation has responded by firing a biologist and disciplining other staffers.

A recent internal audit said TxDOT biologist Valerie Collins, based in San Antonio, was involved with several contract jobs being done for the U.S. 281 study by a consulting company her husband works for.

Her supervisor, Transportation Planning Director Judith Friesenhahn, and other TxDOT employees knew about the relationship, the audit says.

“District staff attempted to implement controls to mitigate a conflict,” TxDOT’s San Antonio manager, Mario Medina, said in a memo Friday to agency Director Amadeo Saenz. “But the controls were insufficient and in some instances were circumvented by” Collins.

TxDOT fired Collins on Nov. 13, more than seven weeks after the in-house probe started, Medina said. Other employees were put on probation or reassigned and will undergo extra training on the agency’s conflict of interest policy.

Also, TxDOT is reviewing other projects involving the firm Collins’ husband works for, SWCA Environmental Consultants, to see if there might be other conflicts. That report is due next month.

Collins, her husband and SWCA officials didn’t return phone calls.

Flubbing the environmental study put the 8-mile U.S. 281 tollway behind at least three more years, and doing another will cost an estimated $8 million. A bruised TxDOT, under pressure from lawsuits, has now let two federal clearances on the project slip away since 2006.

“Incidents like this one … are an affront to the thousands of TxDOT employees who strive conscientiously every day to be good stewards of the state’s resources,” Saenz said in a statement.

Toll critics, who suspect the agency’s problems are more widespread, have called for a housecleaning.

“It’s been obvious to us from day one that TxDOT was willing to do and say anything to get a toll road on U.S. 281,” said Terri Hall of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom. “I don’t think one biologist should take the fall. It should be management that pays the price.”

Hall lately has pointed to a copy of an alleged e-mail, received by mail from an anonymous source, as an example that shows TxDOT predetermined the outcome of the U.S. 281 study. Such a fix would violate federal regulations.

But a separate TxDOT audit cast doubt on the authenticity of the e-mail, which on its face implies Friesenhahn told Collins that a “finding of no significant impact,” known as a FONSI, is wanted to avoid a more detailed “environmental impact statement,” or EIS.

The alleged e-mail says:

“pls do whatever you need and make sure this handled .. based on the emails i have seen so far we have a problem. We have been directed to get a FONSI and get this project on its way .. nothing else will work per David . something like this could send us into an eis per (scratched out)”

TxDOT investigators couldn’t find proof that the e-mail ever existed, says the audit, which was released late last week along with the audit covering Collins’ conflict of interest. The e-mail also included a tag line that records show Friesenhahn hadn’t started using until several months later.

“The department is seeking to hire an independent forensic specialist in an attempt to validate the existence of the e-mail,” the audit concluded.

TxDOT discovered the conflict involving Collins and her husband while gathering documents in response to a lawsuit filed in February by TURF and Aquifer Guardians in Urban Areas. The groups challenged the FONSI from the U.S. 281 environmental study.

After coming across e-mails that raised suspicions, TxDOT ordered the audit Sept. 22.

On Oct. 1, citing possible contract irregularities, the agency asked the Federal Highway Administration to pull the U.S. 281 environmental approval. Two days later, Collins and Friesenhahn were placed on administrative leave.

While with TxDOT, Collins wasn’t allowed to choose consultants, negotiate fees or approve payments, but that wasn’t enough to avoid conflicts, according to the audit. E-mails show she worked with SWCA and reviewed three jobs that her husband also worked on.

Collins corresponded often with SWCA, sometimes copying her husband or communicating directly with him, the report says.

She once asked that time and money be added to a work authorization, and another time offered to work with her husband to meet a deadline.

Friesenhahn said she knew about the wife and husband connection but had assumed Collins’ husband didn’t work on the U.S. 281 project, the audit says. However, it adds, an e-mail the husband sent to Friesenhahn indicates otherwise.

Senators make plea for more transportation taxes

Link to article here.

Texas Transportation at a crossroads
By Senators John Carona and Kirk Watson
Express-News
November 30, 2008

Texas highways were once the pride of the state — and justifiably so. Our extensive infrastructure allowed generations of farmers and ranchers to feed the state and the world, and it turned our cities into economic powerhouses. Our transportation networks allowed generations of Texans to charge into a prosperous future without having to catch up with the present.But for a generation, the state has approached old and new transportation challenges in a very different way. We have struggled simply to keep up with our needs. This has left Texas at a critical intersection, and the choices that the Legislature makes over the next several months will determine both how we live in the short term and what opportunities our children will inherit.

Texas now faces a transportation crisis. We spend more and more of our lives in traffic instead of with our families. We seldom, if ever, see major roads built without tollbooths. And the rail lines and highway lane miles we know we need are being scaled back or scrapped in the face of a hopeless inability to pay for them.

It is only becoming harder to address these needs. The costs of concrete, steel and other basic road building materials have risen by 60 percent over the last five years. However, the state motor fuels tax— our primary source of transportation funding — has been frozen at 20 cents per gallon since 1991. The disparity has left the state facing 21st century challenges with a 20th century tool.

In January, the 81st Texas Legislature will begin weighing opportunities to make a meaningful investment in transportation. Here are alternatives that we believe the state must explore:

•End Transportation Funding Diversions: The State Highway Fund has long provided money for the Department of Public Safety and other priorities. We must focus this money on roads and other transportation projects.

•Use Bond Funding Transparently: A year ago, Texans voted to dedicate $5 billion in tax-supported bonds to transportation projects. The Legislature should appropriate this money for its intended purpose and commit to using it with complete transparency and accountability.

•Support Regional Financing Tools: Other than toll roads and privatization schemes, the state has provided few options for cities, counties and other local jurisdictions to fund transportation. The Legislature should offer new voter-approved funding mechanisms for regions to plan and pay for roads, rail lines and other projects.

•Rewrite the Gas Tax: Texas’ primary source of transportation funding cannot provide for the state’s transportation needs. The Legislature must have a serious debate about restructuring the motor fuels tax to reflect the enormity of our tasks by indexing it to inflation.

•Explore New Alternatives: Texas must move past a 20th century model that relies so heavily on single-occupancy vehicles and work to create a truly comprehensive statewide system for moving people and freight. This should begin by funding the Rail Relocation Fund that voters overwhelmingly approved in 2005.

•Reform the Texas Department of Transportation: With its overt advocacy of privatization and occasional disregard for the Legislature, the Department has rightly incurred the wrath of Texans and their representatives. While we applaud the department’s recent efforts to be more transparent and accountable, the Legislature must fundamentally reform the agency so Texans are fully aware of its activities and never question its objectives.

These changes will not be easy, and they will confound the frequent promises of something for nothing. But they are necessary if we are to address the needs we see every day at rush hour — challenges that will only become greater. Our children must not be the first generation of Texans to inherit an inadequate transportation infrastructure with nowhere to grow.

Bridge for Ports to Plains Trans Texas Corridor approved, funded

Link to article here.

Ports to Plains is one of the identified Trans Texas Corridor (TTC) routes, and this Dumas bridge is a vital gateway to making it happen. So don’t believe it when politicians claim the Trans Texas Corridor is dead. How can it be when it barrels ahead all over the state unabated. Unless the Legislature revokes the law and repeals all policies allowing the TTC, it WILL continue.

$17M OK’d for Ports-to-Plains Dumas bridge
By Chris Ramirez
Amarillo Globe-News
11/12/08
DUMAS – A longtime plan to stretch a railroad overpass across U.S. Highway 87 in Dumas has finally been funded.

Ports-to-Plains in West Texas

  • Eagle Pass Relief Route (Loop 480; five projects): $94.46 million
  • San Angelo Relief Route (Loop 306): $20 million
  • Dumas Railway Overpass on U.S. Highway 87: $17.71 million
  • U.S. Highway 349 expansion in Midland County: $7.55 million
  • Total: $139.72 millionOn the Net:The Ports-to-Plains coalition is based in Lubbock.
  • www.portstoplains.com
  • The $17.71 million project was included in a $1.8 billion spending package approved last month by the Texas Transportation Commission for new construction statewide.The project is one of several pitched by backers of the Ports-to-Plains Trade Corridor, an ambitious concept that seeks to foster commercial trade from Texas to Canada. In all, $140 million will go to Ports-to-Plains projects.

    The overpass will relieve congestion that erupts in downtown Dumas when freight trains block First Street, which leads to the Monsanto agriculture manufacturing plant.

    Word of the funding was welcome news to police and fire officials, who have long warned about trains slowing their response to emergency calls.

    “If we have a 100-car train go through here … we have no access, none,” said Milton Pax, Moore County commissioner of Precinct 3.

    U.S. Highway 87 runs north-south through most of the central Texas Panhandle, but turns into a west-east road at First Street in Dumas. Getting to the Monsanto plant from the city means crossing a set of street-level railroad tracks about 1 mile from downtown.

    Dumas fire Chief Paul J. Jenkins warned of the dangers of the increase in train traffic and road blockage on First Street and at Farm-To-Market Road 722, another crossing, in an Aug. 20 letter. Going around could delay response, he wrote.

    Fire officials respond to 40-60 calls each year for service west of the city, records show.

    “When a train comes through here, we’re completely cut off from the western side of the county,” said Jeff Turner, chief executive of the Moore County Hospital District. “We could literally could have someone 25 feet away and couldn’t do anything about it until it passes.”

    Also submitting letters were Monsanto, the Dumas Police Department and the local school district.

    Funding for the projects will come from bonds under Proposition 14, which voters supported in 2003.

    The debt will support development and construction projects through 2011, said Michael Reeves, president of the Ports-to-Plains Corridor coalition.

    The county may start taking bids on the project in December 2010, Pax said.

    © The Amarillo Globe-News Online

    Obama FOR congestion tolling, nationalized toll road bank

    Link to article here.

    For those who breathed a sigh of relief thinking we were finally rid of George W. Bush’s pro-toll agenda, think again. Not only did Obama support the idea of a toll road bank in March, it’s now confirmed his administration wants to charge you a pain tax (from $9 for motorists up to $22 for trucks if he adopts the Manhattan congestion tolling proposal he supported) to enter major U.S. cities during rush hours. This congestion tax was overwhelmingly rejected by New York lawmakers. So in other words, when 99.9% of working people have to get to work, motorists will have to pay a tax to reach their place of employment. How is that an incentive to make a living? Some might choose to draw unemployment instead of pay such punitive taxation!

    Obama Transition Team Examines Congestion Tax
    UK congestion charge consultants report Obama transition team interested in tolling
    The Newspaper.com
    November 12, 2008

    Jack OpiolaBritish newspapers report that President-elect Barack Obama (D) may import congestion charging programs from the UK. Jack Opiola, a transportation principal for the firm Booz, Allen and Hamilton, was hired to design a program to tax drivers at least £5 (US $8) when entering the city of Manchester during peak hours. Opiola told the Manchester Evening News yesterday that the president-elect’s transition team approached him for additional details on the plan.

    “I was ‘noticed’ by key people in the Obama campaign and I have been providing input to his strategy team in Chicago, including information about Greater Manchester’s bid,” Opiola said.

    If approved in a referendum later this month, drivers entering an 80 square mile section of Manchester would be subject to the charge. The program would generate £120 million (US $180 million) in annual profit. A similar program in London cost drivers £268 million (US $408 million) and failed to provide promised reductions in congestion, according to Transport for London data (view report).

    Until now, Senator Obama has been circumspect when discussing his administration’s transportation plans. Previously, his most specific proposal was the creation of a $60 billion toll road bank (view details). In March, Obama endorsed New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s idea to charge a $9 toll on cars and a $22 toll for trucks that enter downtown Manhattan during working hours.

    Hoping to fill the gap with specifics, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) last month submitted a detailed $544 billion transportation reauthorization proposal designed to encourage the new administration to shore up the domestic economy with heavy spending on infrastructure projects. The new programs would be paid for with massive new tax hikes, including a per-mile driving tax that would begin with “proof of concept” trials as early as 2010. The tax would initially be one cent per mile and generate $32.4 billion a year. An extra one cent per gallon in the federal gasoline tax would generate another $1.8 billion, and a national sales tax on cars of one percent would generate $7.6 billion.

    “With this historic election, AASHTO is optimistic that the new administration can help to foster the political will necessary to bridge the gap between today’s transportation needs and the transportation system we must build for tomorrow,” the group said in a statement.

    Source: Obama team study c-charge (Manchester Evening News (UK), 11/12/2008)

    QUID PRO QUO: Pro-toll Rodriguez gets expedited, non-toll FREEway project in his precinct

    Link to WOAI-TV news story.

    After repeatedly voting to toll (also see here) existing freeways on the northside as a Board member of the San Antonio MPO (SAMPO), Bexar County Commissioner Chico Rodriguez is cashing in by getting an expedited, NON-TOLL, FREEway fix to 1604 (west) in his own district. Can you say quid pro quo? This is how TxDOT controls the majority of SAMPO, by quid pro quos and goodies for those who tow the TxDOT toll road line.

    Rodriguez’ most recent SAMPO vote was to move ahead in a hostile takeover of the Hill Country. He admitted prior to the vote that the purpose of engulfing the Hill Country into SAMPO was to get access to the Hill Country’s gas tax allocations in order to fund needed road projects in his precinct. Also, remember that Rodriguez denied he EVER voted for toll roads when his SAMPO votes were made known to his constituents prior to his last re-election campaign in March.

    So he lied to get re-elected and ran away from his toxic, controversial toll road votes to keep an angry public at bay until he could cash-in on TxDOT’s promised quid pro quo. Many of his constituents drive north for work and WILL be impacted by toll taxes (hence their opposition to tolls), yet he sold them and ALL the motorists who depend on 281, 1604, and the other proposed toll projects (on existing state highways) down a river.

    Big Plan to Get Traffic Moving in SA
    By Leila Walsh
    November 7, 2008
    WOAI-TV

    SAN ANTONIO – With toll roads on hold here, News 4 is breaking news about the biggest project planned to get traffic moving in one of the busiest parts of town.

    People who live near Potranco and Loop 1604 say they get stuck in traffic every day on the way to and from work. Now News 4 has uncovered a plan that could make life a whole lot easier for tens of thousands of people in that area.

    The county and TxDOT will meet next week to discuss the terms of a plan that would do two things: widen Potranco to four lanes from Loop 1604 to the county line and extend State Highway 211.

    “We need relief and relief is coming because we’re thinking ahead,” said Bexar County commissioner Chico Rodriguez.

    The project is not a toll road and it is not expected to involve a tax hike. If approved, work on the first phase could get started in just over a year.

    For a detailed look at the plan, click here. For a map of the area, click here.

    Politicians claim Trans Texas Corridor dead without any action proving it

    Link to article here. During campaign season when politicians have to face the voters at the ballot box, two in particular, Texas Speaker of the House Tom Craddick and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Steve Ogden, are claiming the Trans Texas Corridor (TTC) is dead to quell the people’s wrath against the deeply unpopular project. However, NO ACTION has been taken by either politician to actually stop it. No law has been changed, no legally binding changes have been made to TxDOT’s environmental documents submitted to the feds, no Transportation Commission Minute Orders rescinded, NOTHING has been changed or revoked to kill the TTC or give a basis for saying the TTC is dead. In fact, it continues to barrel ahead.

    Is Trans-Texas Corridor dead or only undead?
    By Fred Afflerbach
    Published October 31, 2008

    Put a fork in it. That’s what two Texas politicians recently said about the controversial Trans-Texas Corridor.“Everybody in Austin knows it’s dead. Everybody across the state knows it’s dead. It’s just something to be talking about,” House Speaker Tom Craddick, R-Midland, said at a debate in Midland on Oct. 19, according to a published report.

    But folks fighting the corridor here in Central Texas call it election season bluster.

    “Yes, they are still planning to do it,” said Mae Smith, Holland mayor. “That’s nothing but political talk. I don’t believe anything Mr. Craddick says, or any politician says prior to election.”

    Ms. Smith is also president of the Eastern Central Texas Sub-regional Planning Commission, a group of mayors and school board members who are working to stop the corridor by pushing environmental impact studies. The commission says expansion of Interstate 35 is a viable alternative.

    “We’re not denying there is a traffic problem. But keep it in the footprint of I-35 . . . and not destroy our prime farm land, school districts and towns,” Ms. Smith said.

    A spokeswoman for Craddick responded Thursday.

    “The House overwhelmingly voted to place a moratorium on the Trans-Texas Corridor because of various issues that were raised, such as property rights and toll roads. Currently, the House Transportation Committee, the House Appropriations Committee and the Sunset Advisory Commission, as well as the state auditor, have been investigating these matters. It is clear from what has come back from these committees that the Trans-Texas Corridor will be addressed once and for all in this next session of the Legislature.”

    And that worries folks like Ms. Smith. Once the election is over, the Legislature will go back to work pushing the corridor.

    Speaking from the Milam County seat of Cameron on Wednesday, State Sen. Steve Ogden, R-Bryan – not up for re-election until 2010 – said he agreed with Craddick’s statement.

    Copyright © 2008, Temple Daily Telegram

    Recall Diane Cibrian…toll road flip flopper will regret her vote!

    Link to article here. A recall or other method for removal from office is what tollers can expect. The citizens are tired of being ignored and trampled on by unresponsive, abusive government, and the politicians who stab voters in the back in favor of special interests. The taxpayers are in no mood for an extra tax for every mile we drive! For Diane Cibrian to claim she didn’t vote to toll existing freeways is a total falsehood, and it insults the intelligence of constituents who were there and witnessed her do it (video can be seen at www.RecallDiane.com). What are 281 and 1604 if not existing roads?

    SA Toll Party takes on Diane Cibrian
    By Tracy Idell Hamilton
    Express-News
    October 29, 2008

    A handful of residents in San Antonio’s District 8 joined SA Toll Party’s Terri Hall in front of Councilwoman Diane Cibrian’s district office Tuesday morning to announce the launch of their recall effort — even though their only chance to bounce her out of office would come right at the end of her term.Cibrian has gone back on her campaign promise to oppose toll roads, they say, and they point to a vote she made as a member of the Metropolitan Planning Organization last December as proof.For her part, Cibrian says that vote was on a financing mechanism for toll roads, a vote she says came after getting more than 1,000 emails in support. She says she has always opposed tolling existing roadways and still does.

    While word of the recall has been around since late September, when Hall launched www.recalldiane.com, today’s press conference was the official beginning of the effort, she said.

    The group has an uphill battle if it wants to get the recall on the ballot. It must gather signatures from ten percent of District 8 voters who were eligible to vote in the last municipal election. That’s about 8,000 signatures.

    Hall said her group has “a few hundred” signatures so far, although she said she didn’t have an exact count. Later, she said there weren’t many signatures yet because the group has only block-walked twice, and most people are not home when they walk.

    The group has also launched a robo-call that lets listeners press one if they want to sign the petition. Hall said many have, but those signatures haven’t been rounded up yet. The big push, she said, will come on Election Day, as the group stakes out polling places across District 8 to gather signatures.

    Funding for the recall comes from the coffers of SA Toll Party, Hall said. She did not know how much had been raised in District 8. She said the recall has not cost much yet, “maybe a thousand dollars.”

    Criticized for not living in District 8 by Cibrian, (she lives in Comal County) Hall said the toll road issue affects everyone. Bill Pratt, who is also active in the recall, does live in the district, however, and said he used to be a big supporter of Cibrian.

    “She became a different person after she was elected,” he said. Not only does he feel “betrayed” by what he calls her changed stance on toll roads, Pratt said Cibrian is now “in the pocket” of developers, which could negatively affect the city’s efforts to keep Camp Bullis free of encroaching development.

    Pratt just met Hall for the first time Tuesday, and was so impressed with her energy that he called her “our other Sarah Palin.”

    Cibrian dismisses much of the group’s rhetoric. “I believe my constituents know how hard I work,” she said. “They see what we’re getting done in the district.” She also points out that the vote to include toll roads in the MPO’s community transportation plan came “years before I was on the council.”

    She also says Hall distorts her record on Camp Bullis, noting that she was the first council person to put a moratorium on development around Camp Bullis, created the joint-land use task force and moved forward a council resolution for a short term initiative to protect the property.

    She’s heard of the robo-calls, too. “I hear it’s so long people are hanging up before it’s over,” she said.

    Hall says her group is shooting to gather enough signatures to get the recall on the May 2009 ballot.

    Ironically, that’s also the end of Cibrian’s term, so technically, there would be nothing to recall her from. But if she’s serious about running for mayor, and the group does manage to get the recall on the ballot, she would have the historic distinction of being on the ballot in two places.

    But don’t hold your breath. A quick call to the City Clerk’s office found that it has received “several inquiries over the years” about recalling a council person, said Leticia Vacek, but no list of signatures has ever materialized.

    Watch ARMA lock-in toll road option BEFORE new 281 study even starts

    View ARMA Board Member, Jim Reed, admit at the October 27 SAMPO meeting that they plan to be the lead environmental study agency since they have no reason to keep their doors open without their 281 toll slush fund. So to find a way to justify their existence at taxpayer expense, they’re seeking to rig the next round of environmental work for 281, 1604, and I-35 (which would clearly bias these projects in favor of toll roads) before a new study even begins! A clear violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

    Media coverage of MPO boundary extension fiasco

    Link to Express News articles here and here.

    Transportation authority making cities nervous
    By Patrick Driscoll
    Express-News
    October 28, 2008

    New Braunfels, Seguin, Boerne and other fast-growing pockets north of San Antonio are becoming too big to be without a transportation-planning umbrella to guide how federal dollars are spent, officials say.But many residents in those communities nervously eye San Antonio’s Metropolitan Planning Organization as a 500-pound gorilla looking to expand its territory. The agency’s eagerness to toll new highway lanes doesn’t help.

    “It scares Comal County to death,” New Braunfels Mayor Bruce Boyer told the San Antonio planning board Monday.

    Boyer and Comal County Judge Danny Scheel, who also spoke, have ruled out tolling as a way to pay for road lanes.

    They said they haven’t had time to reach any decisions on starting up a federal planning process.

    “We don’t have enough information yet,” Boyer said.

    MPO Director Sid Martinez said federal regulations indicate that the agency’s jurisdiction — which covers Bexar County, Selma, Schertz and Cibolo — should already include an urbanizing Hill Country swath stretching from Boerne to Seguin.

    Growth projections for the next quarter century show enough population density to bring in all of Comal and Guadalupe counties now, he said.

    At the very least, New Braunfels could be forced to form its own MPO after 2010 census results are released, Martinez said. But federal rules discourage the creation of adjacent planning groups, which means Hill Country areas could be thrust into San Antonio’s planning orbit anyway.

    “It’s difficult to allow two MPOs in this region,” he said.

    But for now, not wanting to push those communities into San Antonio’s MPO, the board voted 10-2 to ask them to join.

    “It’s important to have you here to help us,” said San Antonio City Councilwoman Diane Cibrian, who sits on the board.

    Voting against the measure were Bexar County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson and state Rep. David Leibowitz, D-San Antonio, who are critical of toll roads and the board’s inclusion of non-elected members.

    “This MPO can cram down more garbage in the throat of the community than you can imagine,” Adkisson told the New Braunfels mayor. “We do not want to consume you.”


    October 28, 2008
    New Braunfels cringes in San Antonio’s shadow
    By Pat Driscoll
    Express-News
    The first thing the New Braunfels mayor said was that he hoped his comments wouldn’t be taken as adversarial.

    Coming from a politician, that’s like saying please don’t look for fire just because there’s smoke.

    Mayor Bruce Boyer then told the San Antonio Metropolitan Planning Organization board that its Monday meeting had come as a surprise. Specifically, the shocker was the agency’s scheduled vote to pursue adding Comal and Guadalupe counties to its jurisdiction.

    “We didn’t even know about this meeting,” Boyer said. “Nobody notified the city of New Braunfels, or the county for that matter.”

    He meant nobody from San Antonio had told him anything.

    On a tip from state Rep. Nathan Macias, R-Bulverde, and heat from dozens of e-mails a day from worried constituents, Boyer and Comal County Judge Danny Scheel on Monday traveled some 60 miles — round trip — to put a voice to concerns about being swallowed by the transportation-planning gorilla to the south.

    boyer.jpg
    Bruce Boyer

    Among the issues:

    • Much of San Antonio’s leadership is gaga over toll roads. Boyer and Scheel decidedly are not.

    • The few seats that Hill Country communities would get on the San Antonio MPO board would be watered down by many other seats, which now total 19.

    • Comal County officials haven’t had time to digest the federal regulations and population projections that will dictate how some sort of MPO blanket will eventually cover an urbanizing Hill Country.

    • San Antonio has been discussing a boundary expansion since at least last year but communication to northern neighbors has so far been sparse.

    • Many Comal County residents feel they’re about to get trampled on.

    Several MPO board members assured Boyer that they wouldn’t absorb his city against popular wishes. Nevertheless, agency Director Sid Martinez said federal rules could force the matter after the 2010 Census is released.

    As politicians are often wont, exchanges were kept professional, even friendly.

    “This is a two-way street,” Boyer declared near the end of his visit. “I want to invite everybody to Wurstfest.”


    Link to Herald-Zeitung article here.

    Officials voice MPO concerns
    By Chris Cobb
    The Herald-Zeitung
    October 28, 2008
    SAN ANTONIO — The San Antonio-Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization is pushing to absorb New Braunfels and Comal County.

    The San Antonio MPO’s Transportation Policy Board voted Monday to formally begin the process of persuading nearby local governments to agree to join the transportation authority.

    MPO Director Isidro “Sid” Martinez said during the meeting that expanding its boundaries to include all of Comal and Guadalupe counties would make the MPO “stronger as we go the state and federal government for grants.”

    Created in 1962 by the Federal Highway Act, an MPO is a government mandated organization in cities with more than 50,000 residents, designed to plan for future urban growth and help allocate federal and state transportation funds.

    Some local leaders are worried that agreeing to come under the umbrella of the San Antonio MPO would hinder New Braunfels’ and Comal County’s ability to receive those funds, as they would have one voice on a 19-member board.

    “I’m concerned with the enormity of (the San Antonio MPO),” said Comal County Judge Danny Scheel. “Having one seat on that board would jeopardize the transportation future of our county. Having served on several other boards that shared funds with the city of San Antonio, we are always on the short end of that stick.”

    All local governments in either Comal or Guadalupe counties would have to agree to become a part of the San Antonio MPO.

    Martinez said population projections in the next 20 years would put sufficient density in between San Antonio and New Braunfels to justify it being a part of the organization.

    New Braunfels Mayor Bruce Boyer addressed the transportation board Monday, saying that while the city would like to be involved in regional planning, it also would like to study and weigh its options before consenting to join any MPO.

    “I don’t know that we’re in a position yet to make that determination,” he said.

    Both he and Scheel said they feared joining the MPO also could leave them vulnerable to the possibility of new toll roads in the county, something each has lobbied against in the past.

    “I have a real problem with representatives from other counties deciding my county’s future transportation needs,” Scheel said.

    The number of residents required to form a planning organization is based on census data. The next census will take place in 2010. Once that information is available, New Braunfels likely will be officially above 50,000 in population and could form its own MPO, or possibly combine with Guadalupe County to form a two-county planning organization, provided it meets federal requirements.

    The transportation board’s vote — which passed 10-2, with one abstention — only gives the MPO the official go-ahead to begin talking with local governments about possibly joining.

    Sheila McNeil, the chair of the MPO’s transportation board, assured Boyer that cities such as New Braunfels would have a say in the final outcome.

    “Our decision will be based on your decision,” she said.

    ARMA puts out propaganda at taxpayers' expense

    The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (ARMA) is waging an all-out propaganda war on the citizens who oppose their toll agenda. Using our taxpayer money, they’re sending this letter to every property owner in the 281 corridor, in some cases, more than one letter per household! That’s a heap of dough! This affirms why ELECTED officials, not un-elected bureaucrats seeking to justify their continued existence at taxpayer expense, should be making these tax decisions and getting all parties to the table for the simple solution NOW.

    Here’s our response to help you discern TRUTH from the half-truths and outright deception in the ARMA letter:

    1) One of the fatal flaws to the most recent 281 environmental study conducted by TxDOT is that management conspired to pre-determine the outcome of the study BEFORE the study was ever conducted. They suppressed documents showing the potential negative impacts of the mega toll road, and only divulged the information that would get the feds to give them the clearance for the toll road.

    This email shows TxDOT management colluded to break federal law in how they conducted the study by ordering a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) regardless of what their study found. Now ARMA’s letter essentially puts them on track for the same violation of the law. By virtue of the tolling authority doing the study, it again biases any 281 study in favor of the toll road, hence tainting any honest consideration of the non-toll option which over 90% of the public feedback on the last 281 study demanded.

    2) ARMA claims it is the entity in charge of our regional transportation “options” (code for tolls), which is a blatant falsehood. Our elected officials who have oversight over TxDOT, especially those who sit on the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and vote to allocate our gas taxes and who decide which projects are tolled or not tolled (and who must agree to the market valuation and toll rates of toll projects), have a broader and more superior role in transportation decision-making than a mere tolling authority whose only “option” is toll taxes. ARMA is gettin’ too big for its britches!

    3) ARMA claims no capacity can be added to 281 for 3-5 years. Not so. If TxDOT would immediately agree to the original, non-toll, gas tax funded plan which all concerned groups have asked for, there are provisions in federal law that would allow for an expedited environmental assessment that would be subjected to public review for a 30 day period, and the feds could re-instate the clearance and commence with the non-toll solution immediately thereafter. They have to make the public believe there are NO OTHER OPTIONS but the path that leads to the approval of their toll road.

    4) ARMA’s letter cleverly states that an “overpasses only” option has been rejected by the feds for “safety” concerns when that’s NOT what the citizens have been asking for. There is no “overpasses only” plan. The plan we refer to is TxDOT’s plan promoted and promised in public hearings in 2001 that included overpasses, 2 extra highway lanes, and frontage lanes where needed (to give access to businesses). See www.281OverpassesNOW.com for proof.

    There is neither citizen nor environmental opposition to that plan, and we announced that on the day we filed the lawsuit. All parties are well aware that if TxDOT would build the original plan and not convert an existing freeway into a toll road, the fix would commence immediately WITH NO OPPOSITION. Their intractable insistence on clinging to the toll road as the only solution (and routinely dismissing out of hand all other viable, more affordable, less invasive solutions), is tantamount to abusive government bent on using its billy club to beat the taxpayers into submission.

    Another immediate option to improve the flow of traffic, and hence the safety of the corridor, is synchronizing the timing of the stop lights. This improvement is noticeably absent from the letter and the fundamental way TxDOT and the ARMA create gridlock on 281 to punish citizens who oppose their toll road.

    5) It is an outright lie to state that the environmental clearance was pulled for “contract procurement irregularities” and not because the study was “flawed or inaccurate.” We have evidence from our lawsuit that TxDOT suppressed a study showing the potential severe impacts of the toll road (hence making the study inaccurate on its face), hired firms with clear conflicts of interest, and that management conspired to rig the outcome of the study to get clearance for the toll road, all of which makes the study fundamentally flawed and inaccurate. It’s this failure to admit wrongdoing that requires law enforcement and the court to step-in to ensure an honest study is conducted without further violations of the law.

    6) ARMA’s letter ends saying they are the local leadership for transportation and will look at other modes of transportation as options. First of all, all RMA’s were formed under STATE law (HB 3588) and are officially subdivisions of the state. Currently, ARMA is 100% funded by TxDOT. Though there may be locally appointed figureheads as the un-elected bureaucrats in charge of raising your taxes on driving, they are NOT a local entity but a STATE agency.

    Also, by their own admission in public meetings, they have NO OTHER SOURCE OF FINANCING THAN TOLLS! So if they “consider” other modes of transportation, they would have to use their toll slush fund from congestion-weary motorists to subsidize other modes, unlike TxDOT who can use non-toll revenues.