Schlafly slams Trans Texas Corridor, globalism

Note: Our comments in italics to enhance accuracy

Globalism’s toll mounting for U.S. citizens
By Phyllis Schlafly
Eagle Forum
Monday, August 21, 2006

It’s not just U.S. ports that are fast slipping into foreign ownership; it’s highways, too. A Spanish company, Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., has bought the right to operate a toll road through Texas and collect tolls for the next 50 years.

Hearings held by the Texas Department of Transportation this summer attracted hundreds (actually thousands) of angry Texans.

Called the Trans-Texas Corridor, TTC, on which construction is planned to begin next year, this highway would bisect Texas from Oklahoma to its border with Mexico. Plans call for a 10-lane limited-access highway to parallel Interstate 35. It would have three lanes each way for passenger cars, two express lanes each way for trucks, rail lines both ways for people and freight, plus a utility corridor for oil and natural gas pipelines, electric towers, cables for communication, and telephone lines.

Central to this plan is a massive taking of 584,000 acres of farm and ranch land at an estimated cost of $11 billion to $30 billion – property then lost from the tax rolls of counties and school districts. After the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London, Conn., no one need wonder about the power of eminent domain to take private property.

The Trans-Texas Corridor will be the first leg of what has been dubbed the NAFTA Super Highway to go through heartland America all the way to Canada. This would be a major lifeline of the plan to merge the United States into a North American Community.

Plans are already locked in for Kansas City Southern de Mexico Railroad to bring Chinese goods in sealed cargo containers from the southern Mexican port of Lazaro Cardinas direct to Kansas City, Mo. (and the Port of San Antonio) Mexican trucks will be able to drive more sealed containers up the fast lanes of the NAFTA Super Highway, inspected only electronically if at all, and making their first customs stop in Kansas City.

In response to recent articles in conservative publications about the sovereignty, freedom and economic dangers that will result from President George W. Bush’s creating the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America in Waco, Texas, in March 2005, the partnership has issued an unconvincing rebuttal.

This Security and Prosperity Partnership document starts by declaring, “Our three great nations share a belief in freedom, economic opportunity, and strong democratic institutions.” That’s false; Mexico is a corrupt country where a few families control all the wealth while the rest of the people are kept in abject poverty with no hope of economic opportunity.

The rebuttal states that partnership’s mission is to make “our businesses more competitive in the global marketplace.” That’s globalist doubletalk that means producing U.S. goods with cheap foreign labor, thereby destroying the U.S. middle class.

The rebuttal states that the project wasn’t “signed” by Bush at Waco. But when Bush went to Cancun, Mexico, in March 2006, he proclaimed the first anniversary of whatever he had agreed to in Waco in 2005, and he sent Michael Chertoff to Ottawa to take “an important first step” toward whatever Bush did or didn’t sign in Waco.

The rebuttal denies that the partnership’s working groups are secret, but the Security and Prosperity Partnership won’t release the names of who is serving on them. The rebuttal denies that the partnership will “cost U.S. taxpayer money” because it is using “existing budget resources” (no doubt coming from the fairy godmother.

Thanks to the Internet, we can often find out more about the doings of the Bush administration from the foreign press than from U.S. media. A Spanish-language article written from a Mexican perspective one year ago fully described the plan for the “deep integration” of the three North American countries.

Economist and researcher Miguel Pickard explained that although the plan is sometimes called NAFTA Plus, there will be no single treaty text and nothing will be submitted to the legislatures of the three countries. The elites plan to implement their shared vision of “a merged future” through “the signing of ‘regulations’ free of citizen review.” Pickard revealed a series of three meetings of a new entity called the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America. After secretly conniving in Toronto, New York and Monterrey, Mexico, the task force called for a unified North American Border Action Plan (i.e., open borders among the three countries), and the three countries then signed “close to 300 regulations.”

The United States was represented at the meeting by Robert Pastor, who has been working for years to promote North American integration. Pickard revealed that Pastor is in “constant dialogue” with Jorge G. Castaneda, Vicente Fox’s foreign relations adviser. Pickard is convinced that George W. Bush is “vigorously pushing” the idea of a “North American community.” Pickard concluded that the schedule calls for beginning with a customs union, then a common market, then a monetary and economic union, and finally the adoption of a single currency (already baptized as the “amero” by Pastor).

Rail heist: Florida (like TX) using taxpayer money to upgrade private rail lines as part of NAFTA trade

Link to article here.

THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
$491 million NAFTA rail deal
Whistleblower says it’s about carrying cheap China goods
By Jerome Corsi, Ph.D.
World Net Daily.com
August 21, 2006

A $491 million public-financing deal promoted by Florida Gov. Jeb Bush as a boon to commuters actually paves the way for shipping more cheap goods from China to the North American marketplace, charges a whistleblower.

Ex-CSX Transportation employee Dave Nelson told WND the deal in Florida amounts to providing CSXT with a public subsidy. Money from the public purse will position the railroad company as a major freight carrier throughout Florida, transporting cargo containers filled with cheap goods coming into the NAFTA marketplace from China.

CSXT is positioned to receive millions in the deal. Under the terms of the agreement, the state of Florida will invest $318 “in partnership with CSXT” to improve the infrastructure and expand capacity on existing train tracks. According to CSXT, the breakdown of how the Florida subsidy will be spent is specified as follows:

  • $198 million for projects on the CSXT rail line between Baldwin to Plant City, referred to as the “S” line;
  • $ 59 million to build five road overpasses in Alachua, Sumter and Marion counties on this line;
  • $ 52 million on other CSXT rail lines around the state; and
  • $ 9 million to build access roads to the new Integrated Logistics Center in Winter Haven – the mother of all rail yards – which will be built by CSXT

Commuter lines, when opened, will only operate five trips at peak morning and afternoon rush hours, with the commuter trains running again only at two-hour frequency in non-peak hours. At other times, CSXT will use the commuter rail lines for transporting freight.

Dave Nelson told WND the Florida subsidy for CSXT reflects a nationwide trend. In 2005, the Bush administration passed through Congress a $286.4 billion transportation bill, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users. The purpose of the legislation was supposedly to provide funding for federal highways and transit programs.

But Nelson told WND the bill was being used to provide a public subsidy for upgrading freight railroads such as CSXT on taxpayer dollars.

“This CSXT deal in Florida reflects a national strategy that falls in line with President Bush’s $286 billion transportation spending package for highways and railroads,” he said. “What the federal government plans to do is to buy up unused and aging rail lines all across the country and to use taxpayer dollars to pay for upgrading the infrastructure. What is left unsaid is that the railroad freight companies CSX will get priority over mass transit for the use of the new rail lines.”

Nelson also told WND that CSXT plans to over-charge the government for upgrading and maintaining rail lines.

“CSX will do the maintenance on the rail lines, but state and federal funds will fund the maintenance for CSX,” he said. “As I have already proven to the U.S. Department of Transportation, companies like CSX in particular use a form of cost-shifting which permits CSX to take the cost of labor and materials and ‘cost-shift’ CSX responsibilities over to maintenance, which then will be paid by federal and state tax dollars. Instead of keeping this as a separate entity to improve transportation between two points, the Bush administrations nationally and in Florida are shoving this down the people’s throat.”

Nelson noted that Florida had already voted down the state proposal to build a “Bullet Train” for rapid rail mass transit “because the state couldn’t prove the economics of the deal or how many riders the Bullet Train would actually have.”

The economic benefit to CSXT is clear, Nelson told WND: “CSXT sells abandoned or obsolete rails to the state government at an astronomical price. Then CSXT gets tax dollars to pay for modernizing the railroad infrastructure and maintaining it afterwards. The result is that CSXT gets priority over the new rail lines, pushing mass transit to a second, very distant position. Cost-shifting is a great deal for CSXT, but a lousy deal for the taxpayers.”

In 1993, Nelson’s allegations that CSXT was over-charging for improvements made to railroad crossings resulted a Federal DOT investigation in conjunction with the Florida Attorney General’s Office. To resolve the RICO charges, CSXT made a “voluntary refund” of $2.1 million to 18 states in restitution for overcharges. In 1994, Nelson filed a False Claims Action against CSXT that was settled in 1995 when CSXT offered the U.S. Department of Justice a $5.9 million payment for the overcharges.

In 2005, New York Times reporter Walt Bogdanich won a Pulitzer Prize for series of articles entitled “Death on the Tracks,” investigating railroad company cover-ups regarding faulty equipment, overcharges and fatal accidents at railroad crossing accidents. Bogdanich’s investigation was prompted and advanced by inside information Dave Nelson supplied.

Nelson maintains that a primary purpose of SAFETEA-LU Act is to provide a NAFTA infrastructure for moving cheap goods from China into the interior of the U.S. Currently, Dave Nelson, is on leave for a back injury from a stockroom job at Lowes in Florida, working the midnight shift stacking shelves for $9.48 an hour.

Nelson said he connected the dots between his railroad experience and what he perceives is the government plan to build NAFTA railroad corridors.

“If you go to Lowes you will now see that 75 to 80 percent of all the inventory on the shelves comes from China,” he said. “First you have to produce these goods at low cost and China has the lowest possible labor cost using child labor, slave labor, or labor at practically no cost that American workers can’t possibly compete with. So, our government has allowed a huge number of manufacturing jobs to go to China, but then you need to move these goods back to the end-user in the U.S. Then you get into logistics. This involves maritime, trucks, and rails. The goal is to improve the railroad infrastructure to increase the speed freight trains can move through the U.S. The government doesn’t want to tell the U.S. taxpayer that $284 billion in tax dollars are going to be moved into private railroad. So, the government instead argues that the goal is to improve the infrastructure by developing mass transit, just like you see going on in Florida right now.”

In return for his role in the 1994 False Claims settlement with CSXT, Nelson received a $1.18 million payment.

WND called John Long, a special investigative agent with the U.S. DOT in Washington. Long abruptly ended a phone call concerning Nelson’s allegations by stating: “We wouldn’t have any comment. We’ve investigated Mr. Nelson’s allegations and the case is closed.”

Still, Long’s comment to WND served to verify that an investigation of Nelson’s charges did exist, even if the investigation was now terminated.

Even today, Nelson’s allegations remain emotionally charged. His allegations concerning CSXT overcharges involve the management of CSXT while John Snow, former U.S. secretary of treasury, was still the CEO of CSXT. Nelson maintained to WND that John Snow was nominated and sworn-in as secretary of the treasury “while he was still under investigation for the allegations I have been making ever since 1993 of what I believe are CSXT overcharges and fraud continuing even today.”

Buchanan: “GOP subsidiary of U.S Chamber of Commerce” and “worships at the church of GDP”

Link to Drudge Report here.

You can always count on Pat Buchanan to speak his mind and to jump headlong into the waters of controversy. Apparently, his new book delivers just that. Here’s what jumped out at me in the article:

The Republican Party, a wholly owned subsidiary of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is in the grip of a cult called “Economism.” It is all about money now. The GOP worships at the “Church of GDP”

AND

Powerful Mexican and U.S. elites seek to erase America’s borders and merge the United States and Mexico into a “North American Union.”

Jaime Castillo: Trans-Texas Corridor has no hope as long as secrecy reigns

Link to article here.

Trans-Texas Corridor has no hope as long as secrecy reigns
By Jaime Castillo
San Antonio Express-News
08/20/2006

It has gotten to the point where you don’t know whether to pity Gov. Rick Perry and the toll road zealots in this state or arm some of their equally scary foes with pitchforks and torches to storm the governor’s mansion.

And I say that as someone who is willing to give Perry and company the benefit of the doubt and agree that new funding mechanisms like tollways should be part of the state’s solution to future highway needs.

But the way state transportation officials are approaching the Trans-Texas Corridor, a 50-year plan to produce a statewide network of toll roads and rail and utility lines, invites only two explanations:

Either they aren’t smart enough to pass the TAKS, the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills, we give schoolchildren every year, or they’re arrogant beyond belief.

I don’t think it’s the former. Perry hasn’t gotten this far by being all hair and no cattle, and the group awarded the first phase of the huge highway contract, Cintra-Zachry, is a marriage of two highly successful and profitable companies.

So, I’m going to buy a vowel and go with the “A” word.

And it goes beyond the usual gripes about the $7 billion superhighway, which include gobbling up vast amounts of private land and turning over the infrastructure to be run by private interests.

The biggest problem the public should have with this deal is the secrecy in which it has been put together.

Cintra, a Spain-based company, and its minority partner, Zachry Construction Corp. of San Antonio, are fighting tooth and nail in court to keep the financial aspects of the arrangement out of the public eye.

And it’s a posture Cintra continued last week when the Dallas Morning News reported that Perry’s former liaison to the Legislature, Dan Shelley, had gone back to work for the highway builder, this time as a lobbyist.

Two years ago, it came to light that Shelley had worked as a consultant for the company prior to being hired by the governor’s office. State officials deny the arrangement had anything to do with Cintra being awarded the corridor contract a few months later.

So what is Shelley’s or Cintra’s response to the latest news unearthed by the Dallas Morning News?

Silence. In the newspaper’s words, “A call to Mr. Shelley seeking comment was returned by an Austin spokeswoman for Madrid-based Cintra, who said that Mr. Shelley’s contract with the company prohibits him from discussing his work with reporters.”

Despite this arrogance, Perry and state highway officials push ahead with the belief that tolls and private involvement in public roads are merely a dose of bad-tasting medicine that will relieve the symptoms of future traffic congestion.

With some justification, Perry has even invited his opponents in November’s crowded gubernatorial race to come up with an alternative or be quiet.

“If someone has a better idea … please lay out the plan,” Perry was quoted as saying in Sunday’s Austin American-Statesman.

Here’s a plan, Mr. Governor: If you want to have a chance at getting public support for the Trans-Texas Corridor, either call on Cintra-Zachry to stop being so secretive or ask it to stop bidding on public contracts.

Are we inviting border violence to San Antonio through toll roads agreements & increased foreign trade?

Headline: Southern border sheriffs outgunned by drug cartels (link to article here)

Headline: Texas Sheriffs Say Terrorists Entering US from Mexico (link here)

Headline: Chinese set their sights on Kelly AFB (see article below)

These are just two recent headlines and they demonstrate how toll agreements and trade agreements may be inviting border violence to San Antonio. With hundreds of thousands of containers arriving at the Port of San Antonio (formerly known as Kelly USA) without ANY prior inspection by US customs or officials (read more on containers here), it opens the door to all sorts of smuggling operations.

With sheriffs already seeing criminal smuggling of terrorists into the country via drug cartels, and with the trade agreements and toll plans in place to allow exponential growth in foreign trade (mostly to benefit China), security and our way of life may be threatened since criminals exploit such openings regardless of the assurances and precautions taken by those playing by the rules.
Read these and decide for yourself…

China sets sights on Kelly AFB
American Free Press
By Mike Blair
August 14, 2006

The Chinese are eyeing facilities in Texas to further their economic invasion of the United States.

Negotiations are under way for communist Beijing to utilize as a “logistics hub” the former Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, which was closed in 1995 during the Clinton administration’s base reduction program.

If the deal is consummated the Chinese will also gain access to two major Texas ports at Corpus Christi and Houston on the Texas coast of the Gulf of Mexico, an 11,000-foot-long airstrip, which is part of the Kelly base facilities, rail links with railcar switching facilities and links with five interstate highways. The Chinese are keenly interested in the deal because the San Antonio base will help facilitate its trade with Mexico.

San Antonio will give China access to a highway corridor along I-35, linking San Antonio to Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, which is just across the border from Laredo in west Texas.

Nuevo Laredo is a major staging ground for Mexican drug cartels, which have fostered an atmosphere of lawlessness in the city. Almost daily people, including police, are shot in the streets. In addition, frequent clashes occur between drug smugglers and U.S. Border Patrol and state and local police on the U.S. side of the border in Laredo.

There have also been reports that Chinese military units have been operating with Mexican army troops, who assist the drug smugglers and have made incursions into the United States.

“San Antonio is a strategic site for commerce between China and the United States and for the exportation of Chinese products to Mexico and Latin America,” Zhou Ming, general director of the Chinese State Agency of Promotions and Chinese Investments, said after a Chinese delegation visited San Antonio last year, according to a report in the Spanish-language newspaper Rumbo, which reports on activities in Mexico and U.S. border states.

Like most Chinese industrial, investment and commerce kingpins, Ming has ties to the People’s Liberation Army, which controls most industry in China with much of the profits going to build up the Chinese military.

Considerable slave labor is used, making it impossible for U.S. workers to compete.

A year ago, San Antonio Mayor Phil Hardberger and other municipal officials traveled to China to promote the former air base facilities, now renamed the San Antonio Port Authority.

The mayor’s office is working with the Port Authority, the Free Trade Alliance San Antonio and the San Antonio based Omega Group International, which maintains offices in Austin, Texas, San Francisco, Mexico City and Beijing and Qingdao, China.

According to Rumbo, Omega International sponsored visits by Chinese officials last year to San Antonio. J.J. Saulino, press secretary to Hardberger, told AFP that the mayor is interested in the project and traveled to Guangdong province in China to promote it.

Jorge Canavati, vice president of the San Antonio Port Authority, claimed the Rumbo article was “not accurate” and abrasively brushed off questions about the effort to get the Chinese into the former U.S. air base facilities.

The former air base, often referred to as a “dry port” or an “inland port,” because it is not a coastal facility or located on a navigable waterway, “has no limits for the products, from toys to heavy equipment [from China],” Vivian Lee, president of the Omega Group, was quoted by Rumbo as saying.

AFP was told by Rogello Garcia, a spokesman for the Free Trade Alliance San Antonio, that a Chinese delegation was in San Antonio last spring to further work out details of the project.

Kelly Air Force Base was opened in 1916 as a training facility. Nearby Lackland Air Force Base was a spin-off from Kelly. The Texas Air National Guard 149th Fighter Wing still utilizes the facility, along with the Air Force Reserve 433rd Airlift Wing.

A spokesperson with the Port Authority told AFP that the base has been used to repair and maintain C-5A Galaxy transport planes, which are the largest aircraft in the Air Force. The base has an 11,000-foot runway to accommodate the C-5A, which the military shares with the Port Authority.

In addition to the airstrip, the Port Authority has a 1,200-acre yard operated by the Union Pacific Railroad. The Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railroad is also linked to the inland port. A retired Air Force intelligence officer told AFP that taking over the San Antonio base would likely streamline Chinese exports to the United States and would give them access to ports in Houston and Corpus Christi on the Gulf coast. The Chinese already control the Panama Canal, through the Hutchison-Whampoa Company, and maintain a major airfield and port facility at Freeport, Bahamas, where Hutchison-Whampoa has a contract through the Bush administration to provide security for container ships bound for U.S. ports on the East Coast.

Chinese state-owned shipping company Cosco has taken over port facilities and warehousing space at the California ports of Los Angeles, San Francisco and Long Beach. This is one of the reasons cited for China’s interest in the San Antonio inland port, as it has extensive space available for constructing warehouse buildings. According to Port Authority sources, a 108,800-square-foot warehouse facility has already been built at the former base at a cost of $5 million and a slightly smaller 102,400-squarefoot building has also been built.

Best known for his ground-breaking work exposing the U.S. government’s abandonment of American POWs and MIAs in Korea and Vietnam, Mike Blair specializes in military affairs and gunowners’ rights, Blair was cited by Project Censored for having uncovered the top “most censored” story of 1990—a scheme to scuttle the Bill of Rights in the name of “fighting crime.” ________________________________
Texas Sheriffs Say Terrorists Entering US from Mexico
By Kevin Mooney
CNSNews.com
August 21, 2006

(CNSNews.com) – The chief law enforcement officers of several Texas counties along the southern U.S. border warn that Arabic-speaking individuals are learning Spanish and integrating into Mexican culture before paying smugglers to sneak them into the United States. The Texas Sheriffs’ Border Coalition believes those individuals are likely terrorists and that drug cartels and some members of the Mexican military are helping them get across the border.

Sheriff Sigifredo Gonzalez of Zapata County, Texas told Cybercast News Service that Iranian currency, military badges in Arabic, jackets and other clothing are among the items that have been discovered along the banks of the Rio Grande River. The sheriff also said there are a substantial number of individuals crossing the southern border into the U.S. who are not Mexican. He described the individuals in question as well-funded and able to pay so-called “coyotes” – human smugglers – large sums of money for help gaining illegal entry into the U.S.

Although many of the non-Mexican illegal aliens are fluent in Spanish, Gonzalez said they speak with an accent that is not native.

“It’s clear these people are coming in for reasons other than employment,” Gonzalez said.

That sentiment is shared by Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.).

“For years, Muslims and other ‘Special Interest Aliens’ from places other than Mexico have been streaming into the U.S. across our porous border,” Tancredo told Cybercast News Service. “These people are not paying $50,000 or more a head just to ‘take jobs no American will do.’

“Terrorists are working round the clock to infiltrate the United States,” he added. “Congress and this administration must address this gaping hole in our national security and they must do it now.”

Patch with Arabic lettering lion’s head and paratrooper wingsSome of the more high profile pieces of evidence pointing to terrorist infiltration of the U.S. have been uncovered in Jim Hogg County, Texas, which experiences a high volume of smuggling activity, according to local law enforcement.

“We see patches on jackets from countries where we know al Qaeda to be active,” Gonzalez explained.

The patches appear to be military badges with Arabic lettering. One patch in particular, discovered this past December, caught the attention of federal homeland security officials, according to Gonzalez and local officials familiar with the investigation.

Patch with Arabic lettering depicting airplane flying toward towersSheriff Wayne Jernigan of Valverde County, Texas, told members of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee in March about one patch that read “midnight mission” and displayed an airplane flying over a building heading towards a tower. Translators with DHS have said some of the various phrases and slogans on the items could mean “martyr,” “way to eternal life,” or “way to immortality.”

Gonzalez told the House International Relations Subcommittee on International Terrorism and Nonproliferation in July that the terrorists are getting smarter.

“To avoid apprehension, we feel many of these terrorists attempt to blend in with persons of Hispanic origin when entering the country.” Gonzalez stated. “We feel that terrorists are already here and continue to enter our country on a daily basis.”

Sheriff Arvin West of Hudspeth County, Texas, told Cybercast News Service that he believes some Mexican soldiers are operating in concert with the drug cartels to aid the terrorists.

“There’s no doubt in my mind,” he said, “although the Mexican government and our government adamantly deny it.”

Statistics made available through the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) show more than 40,000 illegal aliens from countries “Other Than Mexico,” designated as OTMs, were apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol in the period ranging from October 2003 to June 2004, as they attempted to cross the southwestern border. An overview of border security challenges produced through the office of Texas Gov. Rick Perry indicates that almost 120,000 OTMs were apprehended while attempting to cross into the state from January through July 2005.

Local authorities are particularly concerned about illegal aliens arriving from Special Interest Countries (SICs) where a radical version of Islam is known to flourish. Perry’s office cites Iraq, Iran, Indonesia and Bangladesh among those countries. A Tancredo spokesperson said the list also includes Afghanistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and Yemen.

As Cybercast News Service previously reported an internal audit of DHS that combines the number of illegal aliens arriving from SICs with the documented instances of illegal aliens arriving from countries identified as being state sponsors of terrorism (SSTs) yields a grand total of over 90,000 such illegal aliens who have been apprehended during the five year period from fiscal year 2001 to fiscal year 2005.

The border security report delivered by Perry’s office focuses attention on the “Triborder region” of Latin America, which spans an area between Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay.

“The Triborder Region is a focal point of Islamic extremism,” the report states. “Al Qaeda leadership plans to use criminal alien smuggling organizations to bring terrorist operatives across the border into the U.S.”

Carlos Espinosa, a press spokesman for Tancredo, said his office is aware of a training camp in Brazil that actually teaches people from outside of Latin America how they can assimilate into the Mexican culture.

“They come up as illegal aliens and disguise themselves as potential migrant workers,” Espinosa said.

Ex-Perry aide goes to work for Cintra after securing a secret contract

Link to article here.

This story also appeared in the Dallas Morning News, the San Antonio Express-News, and the Houston Chronicle.

Trans-Texas Corridor firm hires ex-Perry aide
Associated Press
August 18, 2006

DALLAS — Republican Gov. Rick Perry’s former liaison to the Legislature is working once again for the Spanish company that won the rights to develop the state’s $7 billion Trans-Texas Corridor toll road project.Lobbyist Dan Shelley worked for the firm as a consultant just before he went to the governor’s office, a connection first revealed in 2004.

State officials denied any connection between that circumstance and the decision, three months later, to award Cintra-Zachry the huge highway contract. Now Shelley has left the governor’s office, and he and his daughter have large contracts to lobby for the road builder, The Dallas Morning News reported today.

This week, Shelley had planned to take four state lawmakers on a four-day, all-expense-paid trip to Canada. But the trip was abruptly postponed by the state transportation department after the newspaper asked questions about it.

A call to Shelley seeking comment was returned by Rossanna Salazar, an Austin spokeswoman for Madrid-based Cintra, who said Shelley’s contract with the company prohibits him from discussing his work with news reporters. Salazar confirmed that Shelley was helping to arrange the fact-finding trip to visit a Cintra toll road near Toronto.

“Dan Shelley was going to cover those costs” for the lawmakers’ expenses, Salazar said. “He would have had to publicly report those costs to the Texas Ethics Commission.”

Texas law does not restrict former gubernatorial staffers from lobbying, but Perry has instituted his own rule for former high-level staffers. They can lobby the Legislature and state agencies but are banned from lobbying the governor’s office for a year, or until the end of the first legislative session after they’ve left, whichever is longer.

“Governor Perry has the strongest ethics policy that any Texas governor has ever had,” said Kathy Walt, Perry’s spokeswoman.

The Canadian trip was to include a visit to Cintra’s state-of-the-art Highway 407 Electronic Toll Road. Interviews with Ontario government officials also were scheduled.

Among the lawmakers included were Rep. Mike Krusee, the Round Rock Republican who heads the House Transportation Committee, and three members of the Senate committee that writes the state budget: Democrats Royce West of Dallas and John Whitmire of Houston, along with Republican Kim Brimer of Fort Worth.

Several top employees of the Texas Department of Transportation also were to go on the trip, but the agency was to pay their way. Transportation department officials said they postponed the trip because a more pressing duty arose.

Though the payment of trip expenses for legislators by Cintra would have been legal, companies stand to gain by having lawmakers’ undivided attention for several days, said Tom “Smitty” Smith, director of Public Citizen of Texas, a watchdog group. Lawmakers should use their campaign funds for such expenses, Smith said.

“That’s preferable from taking money from corporations that stand to make billions in the continuation of this Trans-Texas Corridor project,” he said.

Shelley resigned his state job in September and struck a lobbying deal with Cintra worth between $50,000 and $100,000 to work from March through the end of this year. His daughter and lobbying partner, Jennifer Shelley-Rodriguez, will earn between $25,000 and $50,000 from the company over the same period, state records show.

The Trans-Texas Corridor is Perry’s vision for a statewide network of toll roads, rail lines and utility lines to improve transportation for the next 50 years. Cintra-Zachry won the development rights in 2004 to the first corridor section, which will parallel Interstate 35.

The corridor has become an issue in the governor’s race, as independent candidate Carole Keeton Strayhorn has tried to capitalize on opposition from landowners and others to the project.

When Shelley worked for Cintra before, he never registered as a lobbyist. Instead, he worked nine months as an unregulated “consultant” trying to generate business for the company in Texas.

At the time, the governor’s office said Shelley was never paid by the company, because his fees were to be based on any deals closed. They said that when he left the firm before the contract was complete, he gave up the right to such fees.

The director of Texans for Public Justice, a group that tracks money in politics, said the Shelley case demonstrates that the policy and the law both need tightening to prevent “the revolving lobby door.”

Perry admits "needs" (& funding shortfall) based on wish list "if money were no object"

Perry’s arrogance toward Texans opposed to his toll proliferation and privatization scheme giving public roads over to foreign companies is evident in his comments. He thinks he’s “protected” from getting the boot since the major cities upset by his plans are not Republican strongholds.

He thinks even rural Texas will stand idly by and allow him to heist land to benefit a Spanish company, Cintra, just because he grew up in rural Texas and was an Ag Commissioner. Even Houstonians and Dallas natives have a problem with privatizing their toll roads and handing our public highways over to foreign companies. Harris County Commissioners voted NOT to sell their toll roads to foreign companies like TxDOT bullies asked them to. This fact seems to get lost on Perry in the shelter of his guilded Governor’s mansion.

Also, this notion that gas tax is evaporating and that even if they raise it 20 cents a gallon it wouldn’t be enough is a joke. How ’bout Ben Wear report on the findings of the Central Texas (Austin) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO, that allocates federal gas taxes to local projects) where they determined it would only take a 1-2 cent gas tax increase to meet all of their transportation needs. Read an honest appraisal of gas taxes versus tolls on our web site under “Non-toll Alternatives.” It’s clear that Perry thinks he only has a minor problem. On November 7, let’s help him see how MAJOR his problem is since he deliberatley chooses to ignore a SUPERMAJORITY of Texans at his own peril.

Perry’s road revolution could take electoral toll
Governor emphasis on tollways, private road-builders has generated urban and rural unrest
By Ben Wear
Austin American-Statesman
August 20, 2006
Rick Perry’s political problem with transportation, to the extent that he has one, may be that he’s trying to douse a fire in 2006 that won’t ignite for another 10 to 20 years.

His critics say, no, the problem is that Perry wants to charge us for the water.

What isn’t in dispute is that the Republican governor and his appointees over the past six years have turned Texas transportation on its head, moving the state from financing public roads solely with taxes to a system that would be heavily dependent on tolls and private road operators.

What has this revolution in transportation policy earned Perry, who faces re-election this fall? Well, precious few plaudits from the general public, although the business community and the road construction industry have been solidly in his corner.

His policies have birthed several grass-roots groups committed to snuffing out Perry’s toll plans and, while they’re at it, his political career. The nascent Trans-Texas Corridor twin to Interstate 35, and the prospect that thousands of acres would have to be purchased to build it, have taken an undetermined chunk out of Perry’s natural base of support in agricultural Texas.

And the Perry transportation agenda has handed his three principal challengers a hefty political club to wield as they campaign for his job.

“That’s why you don’t see a lot of big changes in public policy, because they are risky,” said Robert Poole, director of transportation studies for the California-based Reason Foundation, a libertarian think tank. “It may be that the general public isn’t yet persuaded that this is a crisis. In day-to-day, average-person political terms, traffic congestion may not be bad enough yet.”

Perry, with his famously well-coiffed look and perfectly tailored suits, surely doesn’t look the part of a revolutionary, and he rejects that characterization. But he acknowledges that transportation is the area where he made the most “wide-sweeping” changes.

Perry declared the gasoline tax a lame duck, dismissing talk of raising it. Perry and his allies decreed that all new road projects would be evaluated for tolls. They contemplated slapping tolls on existing roads, then backed off after a public outcry.

Perry in early 2002 outlined what seemed to be a pie-in-the-sky plan for 4,000 miles of rural toll roads called the Trans-Texas Corridor. After hearing people scoff for more than two years, Perry introduced some Spaniards who said they’d spend $7.2 billion on the first 300-mile piece, including a $1.2 billion payment to the state. And Perry’s Department of Transportation declared Texas “open for business,” inviting private companies — foreign or domestic — to privately finance and operate the next generation of Texas expressways and railroads.

“What is happening in Texas on public-private partnerships is being watched by every state in the union and several foreign countries,” Perry said during a late July interview in his Capitol office.

“When I parachuted in here on Dec. 21, 2000, I inherited a state that had huge infrastructure challenges.”

Gas tax not enough

Evaluating just how huge that challenge was — is it a crisis or just an emerging problem? — has involved an escalating war of statistics over the past couple of years.

The state’s population has increased more than 20 percent since 1990 and annual miles traveled on the state’s roads have gone up about 50 percent. Meanwhile, the Texas highway system, with increasing maintenance costs and more expensive urban construction needs, grew only 4 percent during that decade and a half.

The inescapable conclusion to be drawn from those numbers, one borne out by most people’s experience behind the wheel, is that Texas roads are more congested than they were 15 years ago.

The state Transportation Department’s budget, meanwhile, has tripled since 1990, including an 80 percent jump from the budget Perry inherited from George W. Bush to this year’s $7.7 billion spending plan.

Perry and his people say that’s still not nearly enough to deal with the state’s transportation needs now or, especially, in the future. Using figures gleaned by asking local transportation planners what they would build if money were no object, they say the state will have $86 billion in unmet transportation needs over the next 25 years.

They say the only way to close that gap, to extinguish the blaze, as it were, is to put tolls on every road you can and recruit private capital to build as many new toll roads as possible. Increasing the state gasoline tax, frozen at 20 cents a gallon since 1991, is not an option, Perry and his fellow GOP legislative leaders say, particularly with unleaded gas selling for close to $3 a gallon. But that was already his position when gas was selling for well under $2 a gallon.

Perry’s November challengers Carole Keeton Strayhorn, an independent, and Chris Bell, a Democrat, agree with him on that point, as does Libertarian James Werner. Only independent candidate Kinky Friedman says he would be open to increasing the tax.

“Frankly, I think Texans will go for raising it a few cents rather than having toll roads,” Friedman said.

A few cents, in Perry’s view, would be irrelevant. Each penny raises about $100 million in a year, or enough for one fair-sized freeway interchange with flyover bridges. So a 20-cent increase, which would give Texas the highest gas tax of any state, would bring in an extra $2 billion a year. Perry says that wouldn’t be nearly enough to return Texas’ transportation system to its former lofty status among states, particularly as hybrid vehicles and other improvements from Detroit increase gas efficiency and cause gas tax revenue to sag.

A 20-cents-a-gallon increase in the tax would cost the average driver about $100 a year. That’s much less than a driver regularly commuting on a toll road would pay. The U.S. 183-A tollway due to open next year will cost $2 for one trip through, or about $1,000 a year for a five-day-a-week commuter.

Strayhorn’s and Bell’s combination of stances — against toll roads but also against raising the gasoline tax — is the crux of Perry’s electoral pitch against them.

“If someone has a better idea . . . please lay out that plan,” Perry said. “None of them do. My point is, if you’re going to be afraid to lay out plans to take the state forward, you might choose a different line of work.”

Finding ‘efficiencies’

Strayhorn, at least, says she has a plan. And she charges that Perry and Transportation Commission Chairman Ric Williamson are overstating the state’s transportation needs to bolster their case for toll roads and the Trans-Texas Corridor.

Strayhorn points to the Texas Mobility Fund, a state account authorized by voters in 2001 that has the capacity to borrow about $4 billion and pay it back with vehicle title and registration fees. She also notes that the Transportation Department can legally borrow another $3 billion. But those other bonds would have to be paid back from gasoline tax revenue — borrowing from future budgets, in other words — and don’t really constitute new money.

Strayhorn also said there are “efficiencies to be realized” at the Transportation Department, something Bell points to as well. Strayhorn said she will release specifics about those potential savings later in the campaign.

But even with the borrowed money and that so-far unspecified cost-cutting, Strayhorn and Bell might be quite a few billion short. And that’s assuming that the Trans-Texas Corridor would be canceled if Perry is not re-elected.

Yes, Perry acknowledged, that $86 billion estimate represents a sort of utopian transportation system. But even if that estimate is twice as large as is absolutely necessary for Texas, Perry said, “that’s a lot of ‘efficiencies.’ ” Strayhorn said in a recent interview that she is “absolutely opposed to tolls. I have never voted for a toll road.”

Of course, Strayhorn, the state comptroller, has not technically been in a position to vote for anything since she left the Texas Railroad Commission in early 1999, and that body does not deal with highway policy. However, as recently as 2000, Comptroller Strayhorn released a well-publicized review of the state Transportation Department that endorsed toll roads.

Asked about that stance, Strayhorn said, “I will not as governor support a toll road.”

Rural alienation?

It’s far from clear what effect the combined toll road and Trans-Texas Corridor issue might have on the gubernatorial election.

Toll roads have been much in the news and generally unpopular in the Austin, San Antonio and El Paso areas, none of which are Perry or Republican strongholds.

“If I just had Travis County to worry about, I’d be a little concerned,” Perry said. “You go to Houston and Dallas, and my instinct is they’re not too afraid of tolls. They kind of like having that Sam Houston Tollway thing to get around town, versus being stuck on the Katy Freeway for hours.”

Houston and Dallas have several toll roads apiece, some of them in service for decades.

The Trans-Texas Corridor, however, hits Perry where he lives, or rather where a whole lot of his longtime supporters live: rural Texas.

As proposed, the corridor of highways, railroads and utility lines could be 1,200 feet wide. Multiply that by the 4,000 miles in Perry’s plan and more than 900 square miles of Texas farms and ranches disappear.

In reality, just 300 miles of road are on the table for the planned tollway alongside I-35 to be called Trans-Texas Corridor-35, and the farmland under imminent threat is probably less than 30 square miles.

But that was enough to bring out about 13,600 people to the 55 public hearings held this summer on TTC-35, and they were overwhelmingly against building the road. Will those people, as well as their peers who stayed home, vote against Perry?

Strayhorn (who was endorsed recently by the political arm of the Blackland Coalition of farm owners in the fertile area to be crossed by TTC-35) is certainly counting on it. She showed up at more than a dozen meetings, taking her three minutes at the microphone to pledge that in a Strayhorn administration the Trans-Texas Corridor would be “blasted off the bureaucratic books.”

That might be easier said than done, or at least cheaper. The state has already awarded two contracts to Cintra-Zachry, a combination of Spanish toll road operator Cintra and its San Antonio-based minority partner, Zachry Construction Co. Strayhorn says she would “bust” those contracts, something likely to generate lawsuits.

Strayhorn says she would encourage Williamson and other Perry appointees on the Transportation Commission to find other pursuits in a Strayhorn administration, leaving her free to name commissioners less enthusiastic about toll roads. As for the 2003 law authorizing the Trans-Texas Corridor, Strayhorn says she would expect legislators to repeal that or face a governor brandishing a veto pen on other legislation.

But Strayhorn, or Bell, or Friedman would have to get past Perry first, and they’d probably need considerable help from rural Texas.

Bruce Buchanan, a University of Texas government professor who has studied state politics for years, said the urban vote in Texas now outnumbers the rural vote.

“But in a four-way race, where everyone has a chance to approach double-digits, the rural vote is crucial,” Buchanan said. “Perry’s got a minor problem there. But he’s protected by this three-way split (of challengers). And he’s protected to some degree by his long positive association with rural interests.”

The stance of the Texas Farm Bureau and its political action committee perhaps best illustrates how hard it is to determine whether folks wearing coveralls will desert Perry.

The organization’s statewide delegates have voted to officially oppose the corridor plan, and Farm Bureau President Kenneth Dierschke testified against it at the TTC-35 hearing in Waco last month. But the bureau’s political committee, made up of the Farm Bureau’s board and known as the Ag Fund, voted in February to endorse Perry, who grew up in Paint Rock and for eight years was Texas agriculture commissioner.

“I’m pretty sure this is the biggest public taking (of land) in the state’s history, at least potentially,” said Gene Hall, a spokesman for the Farm Bureau. “And the whole notion of that, that their land could be taken, is something that farmers and ranchers despise. Is that going to be enough to influence their vote? I can’t say. I know that Rick Perry still has a lot of supporters at the Texas Farm Bureau.”

If nothing else, Perry cannot be accused of advancing his toll road and privatization offensive with Nov. 7, 2006, in mind. Or if he did, Perry and his advisers miscalculated just how much Texas drivers were willing to countenance to get more room between their headlights and the taillights of the car ahead.

Does he have any regrets about his transportation policy?

“If the question is, would I do it again, absolutely,” Perry said. “I think our state’s future demands it. Is it uncomfortable to change? Yes, it always is.”

Toll road deadly in Indiana

Link to article here.

Toll road is Indiana’s deadliest highway
State police to double patrols on Interstate 90
By Frank Polich/BLOOMBERG NEWS
Associated Press Story
Published: Chicago Sun-Times
August 15, 2006

SOUTH BEND, Ind. — Millions of drivers use the Indiana Toll Road each year, but high speeds and traffic can make for dangerous travel: the highway ranks first in the state in deaths per mile, a newspaper found.

The South Bend Tribune reported this week that 19 people were killed on the toll road in 2005, and 11 have died this year on the 157-mile corridor that the state recently leased to a private Spanish-Australian company to operate. The numbers show the road, Interstate 90, is first in deaths per mile compared with other interstates in Indiana, according to the newspaper’s analysis of Indiana Department of Transportation data.

Earlier this month, a semi plowed into a line of vehicles stopped in a construction zone, killing the truck driver and four members of one family riding in a van, state police said.

Officials said the accident is a reminder of how traffic, high speeds, construction and distracted driving can combine to make the road dangerous.

More than 10 million vehicles, including many tractor-trailers, use the toll road each year, according to INDOT. And although the speed limit is 70 mph, many drive faster.

Officials hope better semi inspections and more patrols will help. In July, state police said money from the state’s 75-year lease agreement will allow the agency to increase the number of troopers patrolling the toll road from around 20 to more than 40. Nineteen people died on Interstate 90 in 2005.

Bush delays foreign ownership of U.S. airlines

Link to article here.

Bush delays foreign airline ownership
By Leslie Miller
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – The Bush administration is delaying a plan to give foreigners more say in running U.S. airlines. The House and Senate voted earlier this year to prevent the administration from going forward with the plan.

Opponents say the administration doesn’t have the constitutional right to undo a law that restricts foreign ownership of U.S. airlines to 25 percent. They also say it will undermine safety, security, national defense and U.S. jobs.

Jeffrey Shane, the Transportation Department‘s undersecretary for policy, said Tuesday that the Bush administration recognizes it needs to spend more time discussing it with Congress.

The Bush administration also wants to sign an aviation treaty with the European Union to liberalize commercial aviation between the U.S. and Europe.

“The Europeans have suggested in their minds that there’s a linkage between a final rule and their willingness to sign a treaty,” Shane said.

Shane said the administration planned to issue a final rule this month allowing more foreign control. The delay will prevent EU ministers of transport from reviewing it at their Oct. 12 meeting, he said.

The treaty would let European and U.S. airlines fly wherever they want between European cities and the U.S., and charge whatever they want.

Shane listed the benefits of the proposed treaty as “a lot more competition, a lot more variety of service in the trans-Atlantic marketplace, more destinations served more conveniently, more economic opportunity for the airlines on both sides.”

Labor unions and some airlines oppose more foreign control, fearing it would damage U.S. security and cost U.S. jobs.

“I am opposed to the change because it will result in the loss of American jobs, will hurt rural and small communities and could severely jeopardize our safety and security,” said Illinois Rep. Jerry Costello, ranking Democrat on the House aviation subcommittee.

City of Leon Valley joins City of Helotes in resolution against tollway on Bandera Rd.!

Tonight, the City of Leon Valley unanimously passed a strong resolution against an elevated tollway on Bandera Rd. Third time’s a charm since this resolution has twice come before the City Council prior to tonight’s meeting. The Council has previously balked at passing a strongly worded resolution. Word has it that many of the councilmembers were awaiting the RMA’s July 27 public meeting to see what residents thought of the toll project before voting one way or the other. With 100% of the citizen comments opposed (with the exception of Vic Boyer of SAMCo, an organization of highway interests, who is paid to support tolls), the Council got the hint and now unequivocally opposes the proposed elevated tollway over Bandera Rd.

Last Thursday evening, the City of Helotes passed a similar resolution, also unanimous, against the elevated tollway on Bandera Rd. If the RMA truly professes to be local control, responding to local input, then they should pull the toll project for Bandera Rd in response to both Helotes’ and Leon Valley’s unanimous opposition!