TxDOT Commish: "I'm the most arrogant"

In case the taxpayers need any more reasons to dump the current leadership at TxDOT, here’s the most blatant one yet. In the Express-News article below about the supposed demise of the Trans Texas Corridor, Commissioner Ted Houghton, ya know, the one who called TURF Board member Hank Gilbert and TURF supporters “bigots” (watch it here) for opposing the sale of Texas roads to foreign corporations in sweetheart deals, accurately claims:

“I am Ted Houghton, the most arrogant commissioner of the most arrogant state agency in the history of the state of Texas.”

Rick Perry is using his Transportation Commission appointee as a diversion from his own arrogance in ramming his Trans Texas Corridor down Texans’ throats. Who better to take the knocks for Perry than his most despised Commissioner who picked up where former Chairman Ric Williamson left off. While the circus was distracting from the real issue of Perry repeatedly wielding his veto pen to benefit his cronies when Texans, through their elected representatives, attempted to shut the TTC down, few understand the technical significance of the method Perry is using to continue TTC-35 despite the announcement.

Rather than simply send a letter to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to close the Trans Texas Corridor file for good, Perry is taking 4-6 months to take public comment (I guess over 10,000 people against at the hearings weren’t enough) and seek a Record of Decision on the project depsite the claim they’re not going to build it. What this does is allow TxDOT to change its mind and come back later to resurrect the project (after the Republican primary perhaps?) at any time.

Also, nowhere does the article below or any of the others we’ve seen question how TxDOT can possibly claim the taxpayers are only out $16 million for environmental work when a State Audit report in 2007 said the taxpayers had already paid $60 million (for engineering, environmental work, and legal fees, and it was found 21 of 32 invoices pulled were mismarked engineering when it was really spent on PR!) for TTC-35 just through 2006.

So, we’re supposed to believe Cintra just walks away from a potential $186 billion deal, for which it paid $3.5 million to develop? Considering Senator John Carona saw to it that a STATE LAW was changed to lift the cap on payments to LOSING BIDDERS earlier this year just so Cintra could get paid $3.6 million for losing its grip on the 121 toll deal in Collin/Denton counties, how can anyone expect us to believe that buried among the 1,000 pages of financial documents and termination clauses in the TTC-35 contract that Cintra is going to get NOTHING but the two segments on SH 130, a loop around Austin, when the State kills the deal? Yeah right! Somewhere there’s a BIG, FAT taxpayer liability looming on the horizon that we’re not going to hear about until AFTER the next election…

The only sure way to be rid of this looting? Dump Rick Perry!

____________________________________________
Link to article here.

Web Posted: 10/08/2009

Money flows on road that went nowhere

By Peggy Fikac – Express-News
AUSTIN — Texas already has spent close to $60 million on the recommended-for-death parallel to Interstate 35 that once was envisioned as part of the Trans-Texas Corridor.

More money — perhaps millions more — will be spent as Texas closes the environmental review process and gets public comment on the recommendation to the federal government, state transportation officials said Wednesday.

They said the planning expenditures weren’t wasted because they can use the information in the future: “It will be our asset. It will be ours,” said Transportation Commissioner Ted Houghton of El Paso.

Critics were quick to call it a waste.

“Texans shouldn’t be forced to pay a tax for (Gov.) Rick Perry’s arrogance in pushing a project that nobody wanted but Rick Perry,” said Joe Pounder, spokesman for U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who’s challenging Perry for the GOP nod for governor.

The $59.4 million in expenditures that the Texas Transportation Commission reported to lawmakers at the end of fiscal year 2008 went for planning, environmental reviews and engineering studies. The expense was part of $131 million spent on several segments since 2004.

Houghton said in weighing costs, one should consider a separate agreement with Spain-based Cintra and Zachry Construction Corp. of San Antonio.

Their partnership paid the state $25 million for the privilege of building State Highway 130 and collecting tolls on it, Houghton said. He said that infrastructure is worth $1.2 billion.

Any significant effort to address congestion relief on Interstate 35, including financing, now is an open question.

The I-35 parallel was among the last vestiges of the once-ambitious Trans-Texas Corridor championed by Perry as a network of highways, rail lines and utility corridors that would criss-cross Texas and relieve congestion.

The idea relied heavily on public-private partnerships and tollways since highway tax dollars are falling far short of the need.

Opposition from groups including landowners prompted transportation officials earlier this year to drop the Trans-Texas Corridor name and declare they’d scale back the network idea.

Now State Highway 130 in Central Texas and the proposed Interstate 69 from Brownsville to Texarkana are its last remnants.

Democratic candidate for governor Hank Gilbert, noting January’s announcement, said he suspects the demise of the corridor has been slow because there are additional costs associated with it: “Vampires die quicker than Rick Perry’s transportation policy.”

Perry and others have challenged critics to come up with an alternative, workable transportation plan. Hutchison and Gilbert haven’t yet disclosed plans; their campaigns say they will.

Activist Terri Hall of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom is among those unconvinced that the Trans-Texas Corridor is dead, noting lawmakers didn’t remove the idea from state law this year, plus the continuation of I-69.

“The Trans-Texas Corridor is not dead until Rick Perry is no longer governor of the state of Texas,” she said.

State officials said they remain committed to expanding Interstate 35 to three lanes each way from Austin to the “Y” in Hillsboro. It’s currently that wide from San Antonio to Austin. They’ve identified some money for the effort, including stimulus money, but still lack $1.5 billion.

Any further effort to create loops around cities, a parallel to I-35 or other congestion relief will be looked at regionally by committees focusing on their area’s segment, Houghton said.

Transportation officials largely blamed themselves for not properly marketing the plan. Houghton, in a reference to the way the agency was portrayed by anti-corridor and anti-toll activists, as well as Hutchison, introduced himself at Wednesday’s news conference this way: “I am Ted Houghton, the most arrogant commissioner of the most arrogant state agency in the history of the state of Texas.”

Five mayors defeat the Trans Texas Corridor

Here’s the REAL reason Rick Perry’s highway department killed the Trans Texas Corridor TTC-35 project after five years of fierce opposition from the people of Texas.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

October 7, 2009

Contact:  Mae Smith, President/Mayor, 254-657-2460

Mayors Defeat Trans-Texas Corridor and TxDOT

Holland, Texas – Five local mayors took a stand 27 months ago and formed the state’s first sub-regional planning commission to stand up against and stop once and for all the governor’s massive land grab known as the Trans-Texas Corridor. No one thought they could.

Today, the Texas Department of Transportation and the governor announced that the State of Texas has officially killed the project by selecting the “No Build” option under the environmental impact statement study. Selecting that option was exactly what the Eastern Central Texas Sub-Regional Planning Commission (ECTSRPC) forced the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) into choosing.

“Believe me, it wasn’t what they wanted to do, it’s what we forced them to do,” stated Mae Smith, Mayor of Holland and president of the ECTSRPC. The planning commission began a series of what is called coordination meetings in the fall of 2007, by utilizing a little known state statute that forced the behemoth agency to come to Holland, Texas.

TxDOT came to Holland on three different occasions where they were asked to explain why they were going to destroy five towns and their school districts with a 1,200 foot-wide, 146 acre per mile toll road.

“Through coordination, we forced them to our table and then we used the federal NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) statute to box them in a legal corner out of which they could not escape,” stated Ralph Snyder, a local Holland businessman and board member of the ECTSRPC. “That’s what forced TxDOT to recommend ‘No Build’ to the Federal Highway Administration because we had shown how TxDOT, as the agent of the federal government, had violated the federal statute in at least 29 ways,” Snyder continued.

Fred Grant, president of American Stewards of Liberty, is the originator of the coordination strategy that brought TxDOT to their knees. “Had we not had five courageous mayors who represent a total of 6,000 people stand up to the governor and his rogue state agency, the Trans-Texas Corridor would have destroyed hundreds of thousands of private acres of prime and unique farmland, as well as, the economies of every community it dissected,” stated Grant.

The TTC-35 is just one of the 4,000 miles of toll roads that nine state planning commissions are fighting.

“TxDOT can still continue to build 130, TTC-69, and the Ports-to-Plains toll roads, but defeating the TTC-35 is a major victory for the rural people of Texas.”

To obtain a copy of the petition filed by the ECTSRPC showing the federal violations of TxDOT, please contact American Stewards of Liberty at 512-365-2699.

-30-

Read blog with more on this story here.

Perry pulls plug on Trans Texas Corridor…but another lives on

By Terri Hall
Express-News / Houston Examiner
October 6, 2009

If you believe Rick Perry, today he’s finally conceded the death of the initial Trans Texas Corridor foreign-owned toll road, land-grabbing superhighway that would have paralleled I-35, called TTC-35. However, there’s LOTS more to this story.

Perry would have us believe the announcement was because of the lack of political support, but since when does he care a flip about whether his toll road policies have political support? Look no further than his veto of eminent domain reform legislation, HB 2006, and the private toll moratorium bill, HB 1892, passed by a supermajority of the Texas Legislature in 2007 for proof.

There’s never been grassroots support for his hefty toll tax increases nor the Trans Texas Corridor. The REAL reason Perry’s highway department, the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), put the nail in the coffin of TTC-35 was because it was under the threat of a federal lawsuit by a local government commission, the Eastern Central Texas Sub-Regional Planning Commission, which was formed to stop TTC-35 dead in its tracks.

There’s nothing that puts more fear in a politician up for re-election than a messy, well-publicized federal lawsuit against one of his most controversial, polarizing policies. So rather than risk certain death at the polls, Perry opted for the death of his beloved special interest TTC-35. Of course, the Texas Farm Bureau’s endorsement of Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison for governor played a role in the timing of the announcement.

Hutchison said in a statement today: “The Trans-Texas Corridor will not be officially dead until Rick Perry is no longer governor and his political appointees are no longer running TxDOT. Texans can’t trust Rick Perry when it comes to protecting their land from the government, ceasing to lease our highways to foreign companies or ending the Trans-Texas Corridor.”

I couldn’t agree more.

Trans Texas Corridor #2 still alive & well
To demonstrate the point that Texas isn’t safe from Perry’s policies until he’s kicked out of office, the Trans Texas Corridor plan #2, known as TTC-69/I-69 in the hands of Spanish company ACS, is still on the table.

“Officials said that project (69), which unlike the I-35 plan would mainly involve expanding existing highways, remains alive,” according to the Austin American Statesman on October 6, 2009.

When over 28,000 Texans went on the record AGAINST TTC-69, it goes to show Perry’s same ol’ stubborn indifference to the people of Texas in regards to the Trans Texas Corridor.

He throws the public a bone over here (saying the “TTC-35 is dead”) in order to distract from an equally controversial debacle over there (TTC-69) that threatens to damage the environment, private property rights, and the economic prosperity of thousands of Texans.

Bottom line: Texans can’t trust Rick Perry to keep his word or to truly KILL his destructive, detested toll road agenda. The only sure way to keep Texas safe is to give Perry the boot!

TxDOT accounting tricks use funny money, cause us to lose $100 million in highway funds

By Terri Hall
Express-News & Examiner
October 4, 2009
The average Joe barely puts his toe into the morass of transportation funding woes, but when the un-elected highway department becomes a defacto taxing entity through tolling, Joe’s pocketbook will soon take note.

Since Rick Perry led Texas away from a pay-as-you-go system into a borrow-toll-and-spend-money-we-don’t-have regime, TxDOT’s “books” have been in a complete shambles (ie – its $1.1 billion “accounting error” last year that derailed dozens of promised highway projects). It takes an incredible skill in accounting, that TxDOT apparently lacks, to keep up with the cashflow to cover mounds of toll road debt and the increasing number of promises the agency just can’t seem to keep.

The accounting trick this time involves something called “contract authority,” where the highway department can put a certain amount of money in projects under contract before there’s actually money there to do it. Federal and state lawmakers encourage this game played with what amounts to Monopoly money, and no one is the wiser until it catches up with them. Like it did a few days ago.

The federal highway bill that passed in 2005 just expired on September 30. President Obama has several front burner bills, healthcare and cap and trade, ahead of any new transportation bill and Congress couldn’t even agree on a 3 month extension bill, so it punted and passed a one month bill that continues the current law until a new bill or another extension bill is passed.

So you may have heard that the feds made over $8 billion in “rescissions” (or cuts) to highway funds, and will require the states to return money to Washington. Texas owes the feds $742 million. I mean how could they give us the money we send to Washington only to take it back again? Sounds ridiculous, right? Well, actually the vast majority of the rescissions don’t involve REAL money. It involves this “contract authority” nonsense where the project gets “obligated” with funny money that doesn’t exist, and rescissions only affect funds that aren’t obligated yet.

So in reality, only about $100 million in REAL money is actually at stake. Sadly, TxDOT could have avoided the $100 million loss by simply making sure all the federal money was obligated. By its own admission, TxDOT knew it was coming and didn’t properly prepare for it. Now it has to return $100 million in desperately needed transportation dollars when it has been claiming we’re completely OUT OF MONEY for roads in a scheme to make us accept Perry’s toll-everything policies. Thanks to TxDOT’s failure to obligate the funds, the “we’re out of money” mantra is getting some legs.

Perry, whose political appointees run the highway department, is playing the blame game in the government version of Monopoly, but he’s got no one to blame but himself.

Former Bush Transportation guru lobbies to privatize & toll public freeways

Link to article here.

The revolving door continues as former Bush Transportation Secretary Mary Peters leaves a public appointment to lobby against taxpayers for the MOST expensive transportation tax, public private partnership (PPP) toll roads and a vehicle miles traveled tax (charge by the mile). Shouldn’t surprise us Zachry, Trans Texas Corridor and toll road extraordinaire, is one of her first clients. How cozy!

Web Posted: 10/03/2009

Transportation mileage tax urged

By David Hendricks – Express-News
SAN MARCOS — With gasoline tax revenue plummeting as people drive less and vehicles become more fuel efficient, federal and state agencies must find a new tax to maintain and expand the nation’s highway and road system, former U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters said here Friday.Peters said she favored a vehicle miles tax, or VMT, as a replacement to the decades-old gasoline tax, not as a supplement to it.

“The technology exists for it,” Peters told about 400 people attending the Austin-San Antonio Corridor Growth Summit at the San Marcos Convention Center.

A vehicle miles tax would be levied by navigational devices in vehicles. Mileage information would be read by other devices at gasoline stations. The tax rate could be adjusted to higher rates for driving in high-traffic corridors and/or for larger, less-fuel efficient vehicles.

The only problem with the VMT technology involves privacy, she acknowledged, since personal information about trips, times and dates would be recorded.

“Americans are driving less, using less fuel and therefore contributing fewer revenues to transportation even at a time when our needs are increasing substantially,” said Peters, who was transportation secretary from 2006 to 2009 under then-President George W. Bush.

The federal highway trust fund required extra allocations beyond gasoline tax revenues the past two years to remain solvent, she said.

“Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are taking increasing amounts of federal nondefense discretionary revenues, leaving transportation to compete for funding with education, health care and climate change. We won’t win that battle,” she said.

Peters urged Texans to be heard in the debate as Congress prepares a new transportation budget, especially since Texas receives back only 92.5 cents for every $1 in gasoline tax it sends to Washington. Alaska, in comparison, receives $6 for every dollar and West Virginia about $4.

“I’m sure some of you are frustrated sitting in traffic in Texas when some of the funds are being used to restore covered bridges in Vermont, some of which don’t even carry traffic,” Peters said.

Peters said the federal highway funding formulas need to change to allow states more flexibility in determining how to spend their allocations.

Better highways are needed to reduce congestion.

“Here in the San Antonio area, you waste 26,000 gallons of fuel per year and lose more than 27,000 person hours to delay, at a cost of more than $27 million a year,” Peters said.

The Transportation Department also needs long-delayed allocations to modernize the air-traffic control system, she said. Airliners can fly more direct routes under a satellite-based navigation system and avoid the delays under the current ground-based radar equipment, Peters said.

Since leaving office in January, Peters has started her own company, Mary E. Peters Consulting Group. One of her clients is San Antonio’s Zachry American Infrastructure, a Zachry Corp. company. Peters is helping the company raise awareness of public-private partnerships in transportation projects.

Feds to take back $742 million in highway funds

Link to article here. See also this news report on the rescissions from Jim Grimes. Read TURF’s Examiner and Express-News article that explains this accounting trick here.

$742 million in road funds previously promised to Texas to be taken back
Friday, Oct. 02, 2009
By GORDON DICKSON
Star-Telegram

The government puts money for road work in one pocket, then takes it out of another. It’s the type of thing many motorists are no doubt tired of hearing, but it’s happening again.

Earlier this year, billions of federal Recovery Act dollars were sent to the states — including $2.25 billion to Texas — to speed up road improvements, improve congestion for motorists in clogged metro areas and boost the economy. Local officials were optimistic that, with the stimulus funding, long-delayed projects could finally get off the ground.

Now, in a separate move that may delay road work across Texas, the Federal Highway Administration, in an effort to balance its books, is taking back $8 billion in highway funds. The so-called rescissions includes the loss of $742 million in funds previously promised to Texas.

The action leaves North Texas road planners scratching their heads, wondering how they can keep projects on track.

“It really is a very strange situation,” said Amanda Wilson, spokeswoman for the North Central Texas Council of Governments. “We’ve obviously funded our highest-priority projects first, but then the stimulus funding came in . . . so we found the next tier of projects. But now, if they’re taking away money from the priority projects we funded, now those next tier of projects jump over them in line.”

The rescission affects federal dollars that haven’t yet been obligated. It comes after Congress failed to extend a federal transportation authorization law, originally passed in 2005, beyond its expiration date Wednesday.

At stake are projects such as the Southwest Parkway, a planned toll road from downtown Fort Worth to Cleburne, and the expansion of Northeast Loop 820 and Texas 121/183 — known as North Tarrant Express. But those projects, along with the makeover of Grapevine highways known as the DFW Connector, are generally thought to be safe from rescissions. Those projects depend on an investment from private developers or toll revenue, or both.

Even so, the $742 million in lost federal revenue has to come from somewhere, and state and local officials will spend the coming weeks figuring out which road jobs can be delayed — at least until Congress patches things up and passes a new, multiyear transportation bill.

Texas has returned $1.9 billion in federal funds during the past four years, a Texas Department of Transportation spokeswoman said.

Luckily, Texas didn’t count on receiving most of the $742 million in a timely fashion, so it doesn’t have to slam the brakes on existing projects, said Michael Morris, transportation director for the council of governments. Instead, it’s more likely that about $100 million in actual road work will be delayed, including perhaps $25 million or more in Dallas-Fort Worth.

“A lot of this money never existed,” Morris said. “It won’t affect the contracts of any jobs already awarded, but it will affect projects we were committed to in the next two years,” he said.

It really is a very strange situation.”

Amanda Wilson,
North Central Texas Council of Governments spokeswoman

Follow the money…$45 billion in lobbyists vie for $550 billion in federal dollars

Center for Public Integrity has researched and identified all the lobbyists for transportation at the federal level in an interactive map which also shows what they are being paid. They’ve discovered $45 billion in lobbying is being spent for a share of the $500 billion federal transportation bill.

Link to the site here and see more below.

Mapping the Transportation Lobby

Help Us Find Projects in Your Area

By The Center for Public Integrity | September 17, 2009, 5:00 am |
The interactive map here plots the nearly 1,800 public and private groups nationwide that are lobbying on transportation. Most of these groups — primarily cities, counties, transit agencies, or development and construction interests — are looking for congressional help to fund projects like new highways and transit systems.

Hutchison's ban on tolling existing roads extended

Article linked here.

9/19/2009
Congress Renews Ban on Texas Toll Roads
Federal transportation appropriations legislation renews prohibition on new toll roads in Texas.Kay Bailey HutchisonThe US Senate on Thursday voted to renew a prohibition on the tolling of existing freeways in the state of Texas. The measure was adopted as part of a larger $123 billion transportation appropriations bill for fiscal year 2010, which passed the House in July.

“None of the funds made available… by this act shall be used to approve or otherwise authorize the imposition of any toll on any segment of highway located on the federal-aid system in the state of Texas,” HR 3288 states.

The ban is not complete. It includes exceptions for new construction, continued tolling on existing toll roads as well as the conversion of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes into High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes. Under congressional rules, funding prohibitions placed on appropriations bills must be renewed every two years. The toll road ban was last enacted in 2007.

Because the provision was championed by Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, the issue has taken on a sharper political angle. Hutchison is looking to snatch away the Republican nomination from Governor Rick Perry, feeding on public opposition to tolling. Perry’s campaign took shots at Hutchison for attempting to thwart the governor’s plans to toll existing freeways and for inserting earmarks for state transportation projects into the bill. Hutchison’s campaign fired back.

“Once again, Rick Perry is putting political gamesmanship above the needs of Texas,” Hutchison’s campaign responded. “Hutchison voted to ban toll roads and the double taxation of Texans on federally funded roads. This vote also increases the amount of federal tax dollars that come back to Texas for transportation needs, including much needed money to relieve traffic congestion.”

Differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill must be worked out before it is sent to the president. Both chambers approved the anti-tolling measure.

Article Excerpt:

Excerpt from HR 3288

Sec. 125. (a) In General- Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds made available, limited, or otherwise affected by this Act shall be used to approve or otherwise authorize the imposition of any toll on any segment of highway located on the Federal-aid system in the State of Texas that–

(1) as of the date of enactment of this Act, is not tolled;

(2) is constructed with Federal assistance provided under title 23, United States Code; and

(3) is in actual operation as of the date of enactment of this Act.

(b) Exceptions-

(1) NUMBER OF TOLL LANES- Subsection (a) shall not apply to any segment of highway on the Federal-aid system described in that subsection that, as of the date on which a toll is imposed on the segment, will have the same number of non-toll lanes as were in existence prior to that date.

(2) HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANES- A high-occupancy vehicle lane that is converted to a toll lane shall not be subject to this section, and shall not be considered to be a non-toll lane for purposes of determining whether a highway will have fewer non-toll lanes than prior to the date of imposition of the toll, if–

(A) high-occupancy vehicles occupied by the number of passengers specified by the entity operating the toll lane may use the toll lane without paying a toll, unless otherwise specified by the appropriate county, town, municipal or other local government entity, or public toll road or transit authority; or

(B) each high-occupancy vehicle lane that was converted to a toll lane was constructed as a temporary lane to be replaced by a toll lane under a plan approved by the appropriate county, town, municipal or other local government entity, or public toll road or transit authority.

Vehicle tracking tax…what will they tax next?

9/14/2009
Federal Proposal Would Spend $154 Million on Vehicle Tracking Tax
Oregon congressman wants to spend taxpayer money to develop nationwide vehicle tracking and taxing technologies.

Rep. Earl BlumenauerA Member of Congress proposes to use taxpayer money to fund the development of technology to track motorists as part of a new form of taxation. US Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Oregon) introduced H.R. 3311 earlier this year to appropriate $154,500,000 for research and study into the transition to a per-mile vehicle tax system.

The “Road User Fee Pilot Project” would be administered by the US Treasury Department. This agency in turn would issue millions in taxpayer-backed grants to well-connected commercial manufacturers of tolling equipment to help develop the required technology. Within eighteen months of the measure’s passage, the department would file an initial report outlining the best methods for adopting the new federal transportation tax.

“Oregon has successfully tested a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) fee, and it is time to expand and test the VMT program across the country,” Blumenauer said in a statement on the bill’s introduction. “A VMT system can better assess fees based on use of our roads and bridges, as well as during times of peak congestion, than a fee based on fuel consumption. It is time to get creative and find smart ways to rebuild and renew America’s deteriorating infrastructure.”

In 2006, the Oregon Department of Transportation completed its own study of how to collect revenue from motorists with a new form of tax that, like the existing fuel excise tax, imposes a greater charge on drivers the more that they drive. The pilot project’s final report summed up the need for a VMT tax.

“Unfortunately, there is a growing perception among members of the public and legislators that fuel taxes have little to do with road programs and therefore should be considered ‘just another form of taxation,'” the March 2006 report stated. “By itself, this situation appears to be preventing any increases in fuel tax rates from being put into effect.”

The money diverted from the fuel excise tax on non-road related projects must be made up for with a brand new VMT tax, the report argued. Merely indexing the gas tax to inflation or improvements in fleet gas mileage was rejected as “imprecise.” Instead, the report urged a mandate for all drivers to install GPS tracking devices that would report driving habits to roadside Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) scanning devices.

Blumenauer is a long-time advocate of bicycling and mass transit in Congress. Many of his largest campaign donors stand to benefit from his newly introduced legislation. Honeywell International, for example, is a major manufacturer RFID equipment. The company also happens to be the second biggest contributor in the current cycle to Blumenauer’s Political Action Committee (PAC), the Committee for a Livable Future. Another top-ten donor, Accenture, is a specialist in the video tolling field.

H.R. 3311 awaits a hearing in the House Ways and Means Committee. A copy of the bill is available in a 170k PDF file at the source link below.

Source: HR 3311 (Congress of the United States, 9/14/2009)

Permanent Link for this item

U.S. Senate returns raided highway funds with interest, may get derailed

Highway Bill Extension Includes $20 Billion Trust Fund Boost
Texas Insider
September 17, 2009

Bill reimburses trust fund for interest not paid since 1999.

The Senate is expected to bring to the floor a bill that would extend the surface transportation law by 18 months and include a transfer of almost $20 billion from the general fund to the Highway Trust Fund.  The $51.5 billion draft measure — a consolidation of three Senate committee-passed bills — keeps the current law, governing highway, transit and transportation safety programs, going until March 31, 2011.

The revenue section, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Finance Committee, has been folded into the full extension bill, bypassing a panel vote.

The Senate legislation transfers $7.3 billion from the general fund to repay the Highway Trust Fund for money taken out over the years for emergency spending. The Senate bill also would reimburse the trust fund on interest it has not been paid since 1999.

To make up for the lost interest payments, the Senate bill takes $7.7 billion from the general fund for the highway account and $4.8 billion for the mass transit account.

Opponents argue that offsets should be included to cover the loss to the general fund, but supporters say it is money that is owed to the trust fund.

Fiscal conservatives may stand in the way of passing the bill by a voice vote.

Congress had a similar debate before the August recess when it was forced to pass a $7 billion transfer to the highway trust in order to keep promised transportation money flowing to states. The president signed the bill Aug. 7.

URL to article: http://www.texasinsider.org/?p=15450