March Madness over toll roads grips the Legislature!

Link to article here.

This is a great summary of all that’s transpired on this issue, however, I would strenuously disagree with Ben Wear’s statement that indexing the gas tax “will (not) come close to eliminating the need for new toll roads.” He needs to revisit the Governor’s own Business Council report done by the respected Texas Transportation Institute at Texas A&M. It states quite clearly that indexing the gas tax prevents the NEED TO TOLL ROADS to meet our needs.

March madness over tolls grips Legislature
Vexed by private tollway deals, affronted by TxDOT’s attitudes, Legislature looks to rein in Perry’s turnpike push
By Ben Wear
AUSTIN AMERICAN-STATESMAN
March 19, 2007

Mike Krusee looked tired.

The Republican state representative from Williamson County, interviewed at his Capitol office last week, for 10 days or so had been fighting what some people call the creeping crud, a debilitating mixture of cold, flu and allergy symptoms hitting many Central Texans this spring.

But Krusee, for much longer than 10 days, has also been fighting the creeping realization among legislators that over the past two sessions, they might have granted Gov. Rick Perry and the Texas Department of Transportation too much power to create toll roads. For the first time in his three sessions as chairman of the House Transportation Committee and the leading legislative architect of toll road policy, Krusee is having to play defense.

For a number of reasons — campaign trail grumbling last year, disputes with Dallas and Houston toll road agencies, lack of deference to legislators by Texas transportation commissioners, turf battles over huge pots of money suddenly coming Texas’ way — the Legislature has been gripped by a sort of March madness over tollways, particularly those that would be in private hands for a half-century.

What remains to be seen is what the madness will lead to by the end of the session May 28. As transportation chairman, Krusee can, in theory, block most legislation seeking to roll back tollway powers. And Perry could veto whatever makes it to his desk.

But more than two-thirds of the Legislature has signed on to legislation that would put a two-year moratorium on concessions, contracts with private companies to build and run toll roads. Dozens of other bills limiting tollway powers have been filed. And powerful legislators, including Senate Finance Committee Chairman Steve Ogden, R-Bryan, are talking about using the power of the purse to curb the Transportation Department.

Perry and Krusee may have no choice but to make concessions on concessions and on other prongs of their toll road agenda.

“Watch the budget,” Ogden said. “At the end of the day, TxDOT can’t spend a dime without our permission. So, watch the budget.”

Ogden has a unique role in the situation.

In 2003, when he was chairman of the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee, Ogden sponsored House Bill 3588, a humongous bill that, among other things, authorized Perry’s Trans-Texas Corridor plan and allowed the state to enter into concession agreements with private companies. That bill, conceived and carried by Krusee in the House, basically made possible everything that Ogden and most of the Legislature are now stewing over.

Ogden has filed bills that would prohibit the granting of long-term road leases and require that toll roads become free roads when money borrowed by government for construction is paid off. He says tolls should be a mechanism to get a specific road built, not a profit center. Those two short and simple measures would gut the Transportation Department’s toll road policy.

Ogden was asked for his take on why he and so many other lawmakers have had second thoughts about their 2003 handiwork.

“What’s going on? We had an election, that’s what,” Ogden said. “All we’re doing is reflecting what we heard on the campaign trail.”

Others paint a more complicated picture. Repercussions from HB 3588 were already being felt when the Legislature met in 2005. There was grass-roots toll opposition in Austin and San Antonio and widespread unhappiness among farmers and ranchers about the corridor plan to build 4,000 miles of tollways, railroads and utility easements. But although the Legislature made some tweaks in 2005, mostly to appease the rural concerns, nothing like this session’s Category 5 blowback occurred.

It’s one thing to upset residents of Austin or Fayetteville and quite another to get crosswise with toll road agencies in Dallas and Houston.

The Transportation Department, in its zeal to award long-term toll road leases to private companies and thus reap multibillion-dollar upfront payments from them, has managed to alienate the North Texas Tollway Authority and the Harris County Toll Road Authority.

The local authorities want first shot at operating toll roads in their areas and feel that the state agency has shouldered them out of the way.

On Feb. 27, the Transportation Department awarded a contract for Texas 121, a road in suburban Collin County north of Dallas, to a partnership headed by Cintra, a Spanish toll road company that earlier won a bid to build 41 miles of the Texas 130 tollway southeast of Austin with Texas partner Zachry Construction. Cintra said it could give the state $2.1 billion upfront and $750 million more over 50 years for Texas 121.

The North Texas Tollway Authority declined to bid on that contract, a choice that, depending on who is telling the tale, may or may not have been made under pressure from Texas Transportation Commission Chairman Ric Williamson and his department.

In Houston, the Transportation Department said in April that it wanted more than $1.2 billion to sell some right of way to the Harris County authority for three more toll roads. That huge price reflected not the real estate value, but what the state could get from a private tollway operator.

Those kinds of huge upfront payments from private road operators excite Williamson and other tollanistas. But they come with a probable consequence to consumers — higher tolls — and stoke fear that the state is underselling the farm to tollway companies.

And legislators are made nervous by the Transportation Department’s newfound ability to generate towering wads of cash independent of the state budget.

The Dallas and Houston episodes, along with Williamson’s sometimes off-putting certitude about toll roads, have earned the Transportation Department some vigorous enemies in the statehouse, most prominently state Sen. John Carona, R-Dallas. Carona, chairman of the Senate transportation committee, has used that pulpit to bash Williamson and the agency. He also has a thick packet of tollway rollback legislation pending.

Then there is freshman Sen. Robert Nichols, R-Jacksonville, a former transportation commissioner and Williamson ally who is unhappy about language in the pending Texas 130 contract that he says would either tie the state’s hands from building free roads near Cintra’s section of Texas 130 or force the state to pay Cintra-Zachry tens of millions of dollars in the future. He has filed a Senate bill, with 24 co-sponsors, for a two-year moratorium on private toll road contracts.

State Rep. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, has a House twin that has 97 co-sponsors.

Those freeze bills, and most of the other toll road bills, may never move, however. This month, Carona has met in private at least three times with Krusee, Williamson and Perry transportation aide Kris Heckmann with the intention of creating an omnibus transportation bill to include elements from the pending bills as well as policy changes sought by the Transportation Department.

“It’s important that we take these ideas now and wrap them into some piece of policy that is balanced and makes the most long-term sense,” Carona said. “In all fairness, the Legislature has not left the commission with many options other than the pursuit of toll roads.”

Which brings up the gas tax. At 20 cents a gallon and holding since 1991, the tax is falling far short of meeting the state’s need for new pavement. Carona and Krusee have separate bills to make automatic annual increases to the tax, based on different measures of inflation. Initially, Carona’s bill might increase the tax 3 cents a year and raise about $300 million more a year. Krusee’s bill might generate a sixth of Carona’s.

Neither will come close to eliminating the need for new toll roads.

Perry spokesman Robert Black said the governor, who has steadily opposed gas taxes, “is not going to close the door” on a gas tax indexing bill. Black suggested that if lawmakers take away some powers, “they need to replace them with something. . . . If the Legislature wants to make changes, additions, amendments, that’s fine. But let’s make sure it pushes forward.”

MAKE TXDOT ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE! Call Reps. to SUPPORT HB 154!

Action item: Call your reps to sign on to HB 154

The House Transportation Committee has heard these two outstanding bills and we want them to pass out of committee. If ordinary people get involved, these can become law!

Here are the bills:
HB 154 – (Author, Pickett) – Relating to the abolition of the Texas Transportation Commission and the creation of a commissioner of transportation as an elected statutory state officer. Hooray, this one is KEY to making TxDOT accountable to WE THE PEOPLE by replacing the APPOINTED Commission with a single ELECTED Commissioner!

HB 2203 – (Author, Kolkhorst) – Relating to payments by the Texas Department of Transportation to an unsuccessful private entity that submits a proposal for a comprehensive development agreement. This would outlaw TxDOT’s current policy of paying LOSING bidders on these toll projects up to $1 million in taxpayer money!

We need a HUGE public outpouring to support these bills!

Contact the Transportation Committee Meeting members below and ask them to support of HB 154 and HB 2203!

You may also contact each representative by calling the Capitol switchboard: (512) 463-4630.

CHAIR: Rep. Mike Krusee – mike.krusee@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0670
Rep. Larry Phillips – larry.phillips@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0297
Rep. Linda Harper-Brown – linda.harperbrown@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0641
Rep. Joe Deshotel – joe.deshotel@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0662
Rep. Pat Haggerty – pat.haggerty@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0728
Rep. Particia Harless – patricia.harless@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0496
Rep. Fred Hill – fred.hill@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0486
Rep. Nathan Macias – nathan.macias@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0325
Rep. Jim Murphy – jim.murphy@house.state.tx.us or (512) 463-0514

Senator Nichols takes on tolls! The good, the bad and the ugly!

Link to article here.

Hooray for Senator Robert Nichols! He not only gets it, he’s advocating for the TAXPAYERS! How refreshing…someone who is finally looking out for who pays the bills in Austin! Note how the Transportation Commission flat out lied about there being non-compete clauses in these contracts. Thankfully, WE THE PEOPLE beat that issue into the ground and our elected officials looked into it to discover what we already knew…TXDOT LIED! Now they’re doing their jobs and preventing this from happening.

Texas toll roads — the good, bad and ugly
By ROBERT NICHOLS
Special to the Star-Telegram
March 15, 2007

Few issues have become as emotionally or politically charged over the past few years as toll roads. As a Texas Transportation Commissioner for eight years and current state senator, I have a well-documented history of supporting toll roads to ensure our transportation infrastructure meets the demands of our growing population.

However, supporting toll roads does not equate to supporting a plan that prohibits competition or agreeing to policies that enrich a few shareholders at the expense of the taxpayer.

The good: Gov. Rick Perry, the Texas Transportation Commission and the Legislature exhibited bold leadership by embracing the toll road concept. Toll roads enable the state to build more roads faster without raising fuel or other taxes. Few Texans realize that state fuel taxes do not cover the cost of maintaining current roads, much less building new roads.

The bad: As is usually the case, the devil is in the details. As Transportation Commission members began negotiating contracts with private companies to build and operate new toll roads, they hit several bumps. Most companies require at least a 50-year contract to operate and collect tolls. So the decisions we make today affect taxpayers for the next half-century. In the event the state needs to “buy back” the road during the 50-year period, it is imperative for us to have a clear buy-back provision to protect taxpayers.The private companies prefer to put off addressing the buy-back issue until another day. This means they would be free to hire experts to determine what they think the road is worth. It does not take a genius to figure out the companies will calculate the price in a way that enriches shareholders and leaves taxpayers holding the bag. Therefore, before any contract is signed, the state should negotiate an agreed-upon formula.

The ugly: Imagine if you could make a deal with the state to build a store in your hometown, use the state’s power of eminent domain to take the land needed for your store and then get the state to agree to refrain from building another store in your hometown for 50 years. Now imagine your hometown was projected to have double-digit population growth. While it may be hard to fault any business for pursuing such a deal, the taxpayers would hold elected officials accountable.

When the Transportation Commission announced the proposed corridor along Interstate 35 in 2004, both Cintra-Zachary, the company chosen to build the system, and the Transportation Commission publicly stated there would be no “non-compete” clause in the contract.

Fast-forward a few years later and reality is like a cold glass of water in the face.

With few exceptions, the Cintra contract contains a non-compete clause stating that no alternative roads can be built within miles of either side of the toll road for 50 years without paying penalties. It has been indicated that many similar contracts are currently being negotiated giving private companies exclusive rights to many-mile-wide areas of land in Texas’ highest growth areas.

Put simply, the state is enacting a policy that forces Texans to drive on a toll road with very few alternatives. In high-growth areas, the private toll operator will be free to increase tolls as demand for the road increases. New road construction by the state would be penalized, thereby setting up a classic monopoly, agreed to by the state, forcing Texans to pay ever-increasing tolls. There should be incentives to relieve congestion, not penalties.

The solution: Texas’ transportation policy is too important to determine without open debate. Moving fast to meet today’s demand does not merit shortsighted decisions.

I filed Senate Bill 1267 to place a two-year moratorium on private equity toll projects.

Toll roads can be built in the interim by the local authority or by the Texas Department of Transportation; however, the government may not contract with a private company to operate toll roads until the Legislature ensures adequate protections are in place.

Surely we can agree that signing away our ability to expand our transportation system for 50 years in the name of expediency is not a wise decision.

Sen. Robert Nichols, R-Jacksonville, represents Texas Senate District 3. He is a retired engineer and former Texas transportation commissioner.

Truth Be Tolled Documentary to get TOP AWARD at Houston Film Festival!

“TRUTH BE TOLLED” has been selected for programming into the 40th Annual WorldFest-Houston International film Festival (Texas Documentary Premiere).

The film has also been nominated to receive a top award in its most appropriate category at this year’s WorldFest 2007 Festival. The Houston screening date will be April 22, at 5 PM. The Awards Gala is the following weekend Saturday, April 28. Details coming soon…

Let’s pack the house at the Houston screening and in the meantime, order your copy and circulate to EVERYONE YOU KNOW!

Look who's watching HB 2772!

Peter Samuel is the Father of Toll Roads and publishes a pro-toll newsletter, Toll Road News. The industry takes their cues from him. He called our fellow compatriot, Sal Costello, of Texas Toll Party, an anti-toll hyena! ALL EYES ARE ON TEXAS to see what happens here. Clearly, the BIG MONEY is getting an ulcer over the grassroots revolution that taking our legislature by storm. Are any of us crying they won’t be able to commence with the public fleecing?

Link to Texas Observer blog here.

Highway Hyenas

By Eileen Welsome
Texas Observer

March 15th, 2007

The debate over toll roads is getting uglier as a bill that would impose a two-year moratorium on the pay-as-you-go highway contracts edges forward in the Texas Legislature. Peter Samuel, who lives in Maryland and publishes an industry newsletter called TOLLROADSnews, today referred to local Austin blogger, Sal Costello, as an “anti-toll hyena.” Toying with Samuel much like, well, a large cat, Costello fired back, “Peter, my freeway tolling pal, the hyena has one of the strongest jaws in the animal kingdom — able to crunch through bones like they were mere saltines.”

Samuel doesn’t seem to understand why Texans don’t want mega-corridors the width of four football fields criss-crossing the state. Seeking answers, he interviewed UT’s Lisa Loftus-Otway, among others, to find out what was up with the sheep over at the “Leege” who have been struck dumb by the “anti-toll frenzy” gripping the natives. The UT official offered lots of theories, but she appears to have overlooked the simple fact that the natives may have a little more sense than the bureaucrats at TXDOT who seem delighted with the idea of turning over the state’s infrastructure to private companies for the next century or so.

She did mention that grassroots organizations have been a factor in turning public opinion against toll roads. Actually, organizations like Corridor Watch, the San Antonio Toll Party, and hyenas like Sal Costello have probably been the major factor in the debate. This morning, Corridor Watch reported that 25 of 31 senators and 93 of 150 House members have signed on to a bill that would place a two-year moratorium on toll-road contracts. Speaker of the House Tom Craddick has referred the bill to the House Transportation Committee. That committee is chaired by Round Rock Rep. Mike Krusee, who several years ago rammed through the omnibus bill that served as a charter for the current road-building binge. A spokesman in his office said this afternoon that the committee was definitely going to debate the bill, possibly as early as March 27.

The Town Krier cries about our progress…
Then, see what our favorite San Antonio based pro-toller, Joe Krier, is telling the Greater Chamber. More lies…we’re not “anti-growth” nor are we advocating “doing nothing.” Our web site has a whole section on non-toll solutions! He’s the one using scare tactics and spreading misinformation, not WE THE PEOPLE and two-thirds of the legislature!

San Antonio Greater Chamber of Commerce Newsletter Week of March 12, 2007 –

Keep Texas moving

Legislation has been introduced in Austin to slow or stop construction of major Texas’ highway projects and to remove non-tax funding as a revenue source. One of The Chamber’s legislative priorities this session is to keep Texas moving by supporting toll roads as an additional funding source, as well as searching for innovative solutions to get roads built faster without increasing costs to taxpayers. “Doing nothing is not an option,” said Chamber President and CEO Joe Krier, who chairs the San Antonio Mobility Coalition (SAMCo) as well as Texans for Safe Reliable Transportation. “A moratorium might stop the spreading of the false and misleading information currently circulating among anti-growth factions, but it puts at risk citizen safety and economic prosperity. Most of our Austin legislators recognize that Texas needs more and better roads, and everyone is searching for solutions. Facing up to the problem and dealing with it by allowing private investment and user fees is a better option than a moratorium, which is nothing more than a short term political fix to a long term problem.”

Congress loads up the pork in war bill…we're NOT out of money for highways!

If Congress can get away with this, then we deserve what we get folks. If the 2005 highway bill with 6,000 earmarks was enough to wake us up and toss the bums out and shift power to the opposite political party, then this, too, cannot be forgotten and means the house cleaning in Congress ain’t over! No longer can our politicians claim we’re out of money for things like HIGHWAYS!
Read about it here or read below.


Peanut storage in Georgia is among the pork projects loaded by Congress.

(University of Georgia)
Peanut storage in Georgia is among the pork projects loaded by Congress.

Congress loads up $20 billion in pork
By Charles Hurt
The Examiner
Mar 14, 2007

WASHINGTON – Congress has loaded up President Bush’s request for “emergency” spending on the Iraq war with more than $20 billion in “pork” for members’ districts.
Money for peanut storage in Georgia, spinach growers in California, menhaden in the Atlantic Ocean and even more office space for the lawmakers themselves is included in what has ballooned into a $124 billion war bill.

“This emergency supplemental bill has more ornaments hanging over our many branches of government than the White House Christmas tree,” Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., said.

Originally, Bush asked for $105 billion in emergency funding. Democratic leaders say they want to grant the request to continue funding the war despite their desire to end it.

“We have provided all of the money the president requested- and more,” boasted House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer.

That includes $74 million for peanut storage, $25 million for spinach growers and $100 million for citrus growers.

It also includes $16 million to convert the old Food and Drug Administration building in southwest D.C. into more office space for the Capitol. That “emergency” expenditure comes at a time when taxpayers already shell out $600 million “more than double the original estimate” for a mammoth expansion of the Capitol, which includes 160,000 feet of new office space.

Can you smell VICTORY? Moratorium on private toll road deals is on its way to becoming law

BREAKING NEWS UPDATE March 15, 2007: Krusee tells Texas Observer HB 2772 will get a hearing (read it here)!
VICTORY WITHIN REACH! (March 14, 2007):

Speaker Craddick, thanks to your phone calls, has assigned HB 2772, that puts a two year moratorium on private toll road contracts called CDAs, to the Transportation Committee for a hearing. He could have bottled up the bill as has been done before at the bidding of the Governor, but THANKS TO YOU, he didn’t.

After a hard fought battle by YOU, the grassroots, we’re closer than ever to actually STOPPING what TxDOT has arrogantly been saying “is a done deal.” Goes to prove, there is no law that cannot be undone, and the Legislature is wisely wishing to undo their “past sins” and give themselves and the taxpayers a “do over.” It was my privilege to be all over the State Capitol talking to our representatives to garner support for HB 2772 and testifying in committees to push for needed reforms ON THE VERY DAY CRADDICK DECIDES NOT TO STALL THE BILL AND SEND IT COMMITTEE!

How exciting and refreshing to be a part of citizen driven public policy! This is the best synopsis, so rather than attempt to tell it, read the good news and git the skinny here.

Time to turn up the heat on House Transportation Chair, pro-toll, pro-Perry agenda, best friend of the highway lobby, “I barely won re-election due to being pro-toll” Mike Krusee who could REFUSE to give HB 2772 a hearing and make the bill die in committee. Take nothing for granted, do NOT STOP THE PRESSURE and CALLS to REPS until this bill becomes law (7 San Antonio reps still have yet to officially sign-on, we still need to reach 100 to be able to override a Perry veto)!

Also, contact Chair Mike Krusee right away at mike.krusee@house.state.tx.us and (512) 463-0670. One person should NEVER have the power to thwart 93 elected State Representatives and 81% of the State Senate!

TxDOT sold 121 FREEway for pennies to foreign company

This is the straw that will break the camel’s back, folks. Turns out, TxDOT took over a project from the local toll authority in Dallas and turned a FREEway that is already paid for into a tollway using one of these public-private partnerships (CDAs). The winning bid was surprise…Cintra-Zachry. Funny how that’s always the company who gets the winning bids. Hmmmmm….but I digress.

So TxDOT takes a project away from a local toll authority and hands it to a foreign company…which is bad enough, but then today we find out that that local toll authority could have given the region a far better deal than this PRIVATE COMPANY! Here TxDOT has been saying the private companies bring much better deals to the table, and, ooops, seems they were wrong yet again! How bad is the deal? Cintra’s total offer was $2.8 billion, and the local toll authority could have done it for $6.3 billion!

Now remember, for TxDOT and this Governor, the point is to sell off Texas (which doesn’t belong to them) to the highest bidder (the one who will pay them the biggest heap of cash), and it turns out the public NOT THE PRIVATE ENTITY could plunk down MORE! They gave away the bank and CONTROL of our infrastructure in a COLOSSAL BLUNDER, and cooked the books ENRON STYLE, what next? This legislature knows it must rein in this disaster called TxDOT and QUICK! The two-year moratorium bill by Nichols/Kolkhorst is a terrific first step in doing so! It’s on its way to becoming veto-proof and hence becoming law!

Was 121 deal the richest?

Estimate says tollway authority would have paid more in long run
Monday, March 12, 2007
By TONY HARTZEL
The Dallas Morning News
PLANO – The deal to make State Highway 121 a toll road for $2.8 billion in cash was less than half of what the state could have gotten, according to a very rough estimate unveiled Monday by the North Texas Tollway Authority.

In what everyone acknowledged to be an extremely preliminary analysis, the tollway authority said it could have given the Texas Department of Transportation $2.1 billion up front for the rights to the toll road project in Collin and Denton counties. That is the same figure as the winning bidder, Cintra Concesiones Infraestructuras de Transporte SA.

The difference came in how much money the tollway authority said it could pay over the life of the 50-year toll contract: $4.2 billion vs. Cintra’s $700 million offer.

“Is it preliminary? Yes. Is it less than certain? Absolutely,” said tollway authority board Chairman Paul Wageman. “But to me, it shows the tremendous strength of our system. It also demonstrates that all of the money will stay in the region.”

The agency developed the estimates after a March 2 request from state Sen. John Carona, R-Dallas, who has questioned the rush to form public-private partnerships for urban-area toll roads.

“I was not surprised. As many of us have said for some time, public-private partnerships bear closer scrutiny,” said Mr. Carona, the chairman of the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.

Bill Hale, the Dallas district engineer for the transportation department, said he could not comment on the estimate because he had not had time to review it.

Although the numbers may counter the state’s arguments for privately operated toll roads, they will not affect his working relationship with counterparts at the tollway authority, Mr. Hale said.

“I have no animosity toward anyone. I have a good relationship with them,” he said, pointing out that the two agencies must work together on 11 other planned toll roads in North Texas.

It remains unclear whether the tollway authority estimates will alter the statewide debate about public-private partnerships, including the one announced last month for Highway 121.

Tollway authority officials expect a debate about the usefulness of their tentative estimates.

“This is sketch-level information,” said Jerry Hiebert, the tollway authority’s interim executive director. “It does not have our normal level of confidence. But we can’t make the numbers any better than they are.”

>Toll road opponents are likely to seize on the figures as another example of why toll roads should not be leased to private groups.

The estimates make a stronger case for a two-year moratorium on privately operated toll-road deals, Mr. Carona said. A growing number of legislators are lining up to support bills in both chambers that would halt many future deals.

“It makes us want to stop and look carefully before going down a long and costly road,” he said.

The pending Highway 121 contract has raised eyebrows because of its automatic toll increases every two years. But Mr. Carona has emphasized that the estimates unveiled Monday will not affect that deal, which is in final negotiations.

The estimates will be used to help the state analyze future toll road deals, Mr. Carona said.

One Denton County representative on the tollway authority board of directors said that while the numbers are interesting, the region needs to keep moving forward with the Cintra deal. The $2.1 billion in upfront money is needed immediately for construction projects on Interstate 35E around Lewisville Lake, FM423 and FM720, tollway authority board member Jack Miller said.

“What’s done is done,” he said. “There is a deal on the table for Highway 121, and the money generated from that is very critical to our area.”

Presidential politics include the Trans Texas Corridor; Ron Paul to run in '08

Link to article here.

We’ve long known Congressman Ron Paul as a critic of the Trans Texas Corridor and its sister issue, the stealth formation of a North American Union, but now he’s thrown his hat in the ring to run for President. Read more about his philosophy as he discusses both issues below.

ELECTION 2008

Ron Paul announces White House bid
Texas Republican says nation has strayed from Constitution
World Net Daily


March 12, 2007


U.S. Rep. Ron Paul

U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, a Texas Republican known for his libertarian views, today announced he will vie for the GOP presidential nomination next year.

“We have lost our way and strayed from the free society our Founders secured for us in the Constitution, but there’s no reason the principles that made us the greatest nation ever can’t be restored,” he said.

“We merely need to respect and follow the rule of law – the U.S. Constitution – and elect leaders determined to stand firm in its defense,” he said.

Paul, 71, who ran for the office in 1988 under the Libertarian Party ticket, made his announcement on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal program and immediately afterward filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission.

He said he will pursue lower taxes, to protect the United States from the threat to its independence that various international agreements provide, to secure its national borders, to protect citizens’ privacy from government intrusion and to reverse the trend of government taking private property from citizens.

“My concerns for the future of our country are deeply held. The Republican Party has floundered in its effort to shrink the size of government and restore our constitutional republic,” he said. “Instead, in recent years our deficits have exploded, entitlements are out of control and our personal liberties are threatened. We have embarked on a dangerous and expensive foreign policy, acting as the world’s policeman and nation builder.”

Paul, said the U.S. very simply no longer can “afford the extravagance of this ever-growing and intrusive government, both at home and abroad.”

“Last year alone our long-term obligations increased by $4.6 trillion dollars,” he said.

The problems are not particularly complex, however, Paul insisted. < “Liberty once again must become more important to us than the desire for security and material comfort. Personal safety and economic prosperity can only come as the consequence of liberty. They cannot be provided by an authoritarian government. To expect the government to take care of us from cradle to grave undermines the principles of liberty,” he said.

He said the nation’s current direction is completely wrong.

“Returning to the dark ages of dictatorship is no substitute for resuming the most modern and grandest experiment known to man – promoting human liberty by strictly limiting the arbitrary power of government,” he said.

Central planning is “intellectually bankrupt” and has undermined the moral principles of the United States,” he said. “Our planners and rulers are not geniuses, but rather demagogues and would-be dictators – always performing their tasks with a cover of humanitarian rhetoric.”

He said the collapse of the Soviet system surprised many, but not devotees of freedom.

They, he said, “have understood for decades that socialism was doomed to fail. Communism, like all socialism, failed intellectually and failed practically. And so too will the welfare/warfare state fail, and then our cause will be heard. The love of liberty will not die.”

He said a free society is based on the key principle that the government, the president, the Congress, the courts and the bureaucrats are incapable of knowing what is best for each and every one of us.

“They don’t know how to run the economy, regulate our lives or manage a world empire,” he said.

Government as “a referee” is fine, but not more.

“The time has come for a modern approach to achieving those values that all civilized societies seek.”

Paul long has been an advocate of strict constitutional adherence and belief in a small government, including low taxes, individual liberties and less Washington influence.

The National Taxpayers Union consistently ranks Paul as a leader on the issues of taxation, and he advocates more controls on immigration.

Representing the 14th district in southeastern Texas, he believes amnesty is not the solution to the flood of illegal immigrants moving into the nation today. He opposes abortion and supports the use of vouchers that parents can use for private and parochial schools.

He’s supported a resolution to abolish the Department of Education so states, cities and communities can resume control of educating their children.

He’s been especially vocal in his denunciations of plans such as the “Trans-Texas Corridor,” a superhighway project that opponents argue would be used to bring Chinese goods through Mexico directly into and through the U.S.

Why? The ultimate goal, he said, is not simply a superhighway, “but an integrated North American Union – complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy and virtually borderless travel within the union. Like the European Union, a North American Union would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty altogether.”

Plans for such a “North American Union” were cited as the No. 1 story on WND’s list of 10 most underreported stories for 2006.

The January 2007 edition of WND’s monthly Whistleblower magazine, which explores this topic in-depth, is titled “PREMEDITATED MERGER: How our leaders are stealthily transforming the U.S.A. into the North American Union.”

Paul would join a field that features John McCain, Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani, but also could include Newt Gingrich, Tom Tancredo, Duncan Hunter, Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee, Tommy Thompson, John H. Cox, Alan Keyes and others.

Tom Frost lauds lax rules for Mexican trucks

Link to San Antonio Free Trade Alliance article here.

Can you say security risk to not inspect cargo until it reaches San Antonio? What else could be smuggled past the border into San Antonio’s inland port…drugs, weapons, people?

From March 2007 e-newsletter:

Free Trade Alliance Lauds Cross-Border Trucking Pilot Announcement
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) announced on Feburary 23rd that a cross-border trucking pilot program is set to begin. This news was announced a day after U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Mary E. Peters, visited Monterrey, Mexico to officially announce that U.S. inspectors with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will conduct safety audits of Mexican domiciled carriers participating in cross-border trucking. Tom Frost, Senior Chairman of Frost Bank and Chairman Emeritus of Free Trade Alliance San Antonio stated, “This is a significant step in San Antonio’s development as an Inland Port and a multimodal center of international trade.”

The concept of a pilot program was first presented by the Alliance to the DOT in February 2005 as a means for beginning a yet to be implemented NAFTA provision. In 2006, the Alliance formed a bilateral committee with Consejo Empresarial Mexicano de Comercio Exterior, Inversión y Tecnología (COMCE) or the Mexican Business Council for Foreign Trade, Investment and Technology to secure a cross-border trucking pilot between the U.S. and Mexican governments. The bilateral committee is chaired by Mr. Tom Frost and Mr. Eugenio Clariond, Chairman of the Mexico-U.S. Business Committee of the Northeast COMCE Chapter.

The pilot program will aid in demonstrating how the various security initiatives function in a cross-border trucking climate as well as identifying and addressing any regulatory, statutory, or procedural issues that may impact cross-border trucking, among others objectives.

This one-year pilot will seek the participation of 100 amount Mexican transportation carriers. Such companies are selected based upon who first applied four years ago for permits granting operating authority to enter the U.S.

In an effort to assist and train Mexican carriers on the specific requirements, regulations and documents involved in the cross-border trucking process, the Free Trade Alliance will reinstate the IBDC Transportation Program which it first initiated in 2002. This program, a component of the International Business Development Center (IBDC) incubator program, was created for the purpose of ensuring that Mexican transportation companies would: 1) comply with the relevant U.S. regulations, 2) achieve a higher level of success in obtaining a permit and 3) decrease potential missteps that would result in a loss of time, money or resources. To date, two Mexican carriers have graduated from the IBDC Transportation Program and the Alliance looks forward to assisting many more in the short and long-term.

The cross-border trucking provision has been a key advocacy priority for the Alliance, as this issue is of great importance to the local and regional community. Significant benefits of the provisions for our community include: further augmenting the development of the Port of San Antonio and other San Antonio logistics and distribution facilities in addition to abating the logistical inconvenience and reducing the costs involved in transferring trailers from Mexican to U.S. carriers.

Due to the current system of transferring trailers from a U.S. carrier to a Mexican carrier at the border, it has been uneconomical for many shippers to use San Antonio as a hub for trade processing activities vis-à-vis Mexico. Now through the cross-border trucking pilot program, San Antonio can demonstrate that it is a logical choice for distribution operations and as an attractive alternative trade processing and distribution operations center with its foreign trade zone program, state-of-the-art facilities, customs clearance processing and other related incentive programs.

Dan Hearn, logistics manager of San Antonio-based Menlo Worldwide operations states that, “the cross-border trucking pilot can demonstrate how we can streamline the process by using fewer parties to facilitate the movement of freight, thus lowering the costs for manufacturers and bringing product to the market place in a more timely manner. Instead of using three trucking companies to bring the freight from Monterrey to San Antonio, we would only have to use one transportation provider.”

Both the Alliance and COMCE will continue to work together on this issue and provide any necessary assistance to those carriers and shippers participating in the program. The Alliance will monitor the federal enforcement components of the pilot to ensure that the federal officials are conducting the pilot in good faith.

The Free Trade Alliance San Antonio would like to acknowledge the efforts and hard work put forth by the DOT and Secretary of Communications and Transportation in Mexico for accepting and implementing the pilot program, the Calderon and Bush administration in pushing for this NAFTA provision passage and for COMCE’s collaboration and shared vision on the importance of this issue and its affect on our respective business communities.