Citizens file lawsuit over Virginia toll road abuses

Link to Examiner article here.

You gotta love this group of sharp citizens who have made the exact arguments so many of their fellow Americans have been making (like TURF, the Toll Party tax revolt), regarding these toll road boondoggles. The politicians pass the buck (of raising taxes) to unelected bureaucracies who have no legitimate authority to levy taxes.

Examiner Exclusive: Federal lawsuit challenges funding of Dulles Rail
By: Barbara Hollingsworth
Local Opinion Editor
Washington Examiner
08/07/09 3:08 PM EDT
Christopher Walker, owner of commercial property in Reston and president of the Dulles Corridor Users Group, has filed a 131-page federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the validity of the Washington Metropolitan Airports Authority’s (MWAA) takeover of the Dulles Rail project.

The lawsuit asks the federal court to force MWAA to return the Dulles Toll Road (DTR) to the Commonwealth of Virginia and to refund some $300 million in tolls it claims have  been illegally collected, as required under Virginia’s Revenue Bond Act. Gov. Tim Kaine handed over the toll road to MWAA on March 28, 2006.

Walker maintains that MWAA has no legal authority to impose tolls on the general public or even to build a construction project outside airport property. He also accuses MWAA of deliberately lying about the official cost of Phase I, which will not reach the airport. MWAA advertised the cost at $2.5 billion; according to the lawsuit, the full funding agreement with the Federal Transit Administration officially lists the price tag at $3.1 billion.

The suit also charges that MWAA inserted “hell or high water” language in its July 21 proposed bond prospectus that assumes unilateral authority to raise tolls as high as it wants: “At no time will [MWAA] subject its exclusive right to establish, charge and collect Tolls and other User Fees for the use of the Dulles Toll Road to the approval or consent of any other individual or entity, government or otherwise.”

This means that MWAA plans to impose the largest tax in Virginia history – to cover 75 percent of the $6 billion total initial construction costs of the Silver Line and another $14 billion in interest over the 40-year life of the project – without the consent of the governed. The lawsuit points out that Section 11 of the Virginia Constitution requires that all tax increases first be approved by the General Assembly.

“The sole reason that MWAA is involved in this project in the first place is that nervous politicians tried to hide the ball from their tax-shy constituents,” the lawsuit claims. “Their way out was to pass the hot potato to an unelected authority… just a scheme to insulate the politicians from the effects of inevitable tax increases resulting from this boondoggle.”

The suit has been assigned to federal Judge Gladys Kessler. We’ll be following it closely.


Link to article here.

Note: Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison’s bill to prevent federally funded highways from being tolled, since it’s a double tax to charge taxpayers to use what’s already built and paid for.

Dulles Toll Road Faces Lawsuit
Critics Say Backing For Bonds Illegal
Bond Buyer
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
By Audrey Dutton

WASHINGTON – An advocacy group in Virginia is suing federal and state transportation officials over the Dulles Toll Road, arguing that drivers are being illegally charged tolls used to back bonds issued for a Dulles Metrorail project.The 130-page lawsuit was filed last month in the U.S. District Courts for the District of Columbia and Eastern District of Virginia by the Dulles Corridor Users Group against James Bennett, president and chief executive officer of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, as well as federal transportation officials and the Virginia Transportation Secretary. It asks for a refund of $200 million of tolls already collected and for the road to be made a free highway.

The complaint was filed three days after the MWAA sold more than $900 million of bonds to fund construction of the new Metrorail line that will transport riders to the Dulles International Airport.

“We don’t see at the moment the authority behind the taxing power for the toll road that is the basis for payment on the bonds,” said Christopher W. Walker, who founded the civic group. “They’ve cut corners; they don’t have an elected group of people.”

The complaint comes in anticipation of a 25-cent toll increase on the road, and as lawmakers in Congress are pushing to ban tolls on federally funded highways, arguing that those tolls amount to double taxation because taxpayers already paid for them.

The Virginia civic group charges that tolling drivers on the Dulles Toll Road is illegal based on state law.

According to the complaint, state law requires that when payments have been made, or set aside, for bonds issued for a project, tolls can no longer be charged – except to pay for maintenance, repairs, operations, improvements, and reconstruction on the projects, or if they are pledged to the transportation trust fund.

In addition, the toll revenues could only be diverted to another project aside from the toll road if approved by the state General Assembly, and that body has taken no action, the lawsuit says. “This pork-fest has gone on too long by parties who have ignored the law in favor of interested parties who want to receive fees,” it says.

The group claims that the Dulles corridor is “in danger of being taxed to death,” in part “to subsidize the money-losing rail venture” that will add a new Dulles Metrorail line to the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority transit rail network.

In addition, the group alleges that 75% of the money for the first phase of the Dulles Metrorail project will unfairly benefit private landowners in Tysons Corner, a suburban area in Fairfax County, Va., that contains a major shopping mall and upscale shopping centers.

The Dulles Toll Road, part of a Virginia state highway, was built in 1984 and was operated until 2006 by the Virginia Department of Transportation. The 16-mile stretch of highway is now operated and financed by the MWAA, and part of its revenues are dedicated to financing the planned Metrorail line.

The MWAA and Virginia DOT have diverted $133 million of surplus toll road funds to pay for rail operations already, the group said. The complaint says that a 2008 Virginia Supreme Court ruling set a precedent that taxes cannot be levied by non-elected officials, and decided that the appropriate remedy is to repay taxpayers.

The lawsuit – which points to a rap music video about Arlington, Va., as a parody of smart growth in the corridor area – also claims that the Metrorail line is a poor investment driven by political interests.

The MWAA declined to say when it would file any court action in relation to the lawsuit. The deadline is Oct. 15, according to Walker.

“We are in the process of reviewing the complaint, and the airports authority will respond appropriately in court,” said MWAA spokesman Rob Yingling.

The legal battle against the Dulles Toll Road comes as lawmakers are mulling whether to ban states, private parties, and others from adding tolls on existing untolled federal highways, bridges, or tunnels that have been constructed with federal funding.

A bill introduced by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Tex., in May would prohibit such tolls nationally. Hutchison already successfully banned the tolling of existing federally funded highways in Texas by adding a provision to a fiscal 2008 appropriations bill that was enacted. That prohibition expires at the end of this month.

FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial, non-profit, effort to advance the understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a “fair use” of the copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. does not express or imply that holds any claim of copyright on such material as may appear on this page.