Ron Paul wows crowd at Alamo!

Presidential Candidate Texas Congressman Ron Paul greeted an energized crowd - shown here with Terri Hall of San Antonio Toll PartyPresidential Candidate Texas Congressman Ron Paul greeted an energized crowd yesterday at the Alamo. At least 500 people turned out to support his agenda of limited government, low taxes, and personal liberty, including the freedom of mobility about to be stripped by toll road proliferation. Paul got raucous applause when he called for an end to the NAFTA Superhighways, (aka- Trans Texas Corridor), the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), and the North American Union (NAU). Dr. Jerry Corsi’s new book, The Late Great USA, documents the coming merger with Canada and Mexico, the SPP, and NAU.

Dr. Paul himself has been pleasantly surprised by the massive groundswell of support for what he’s dubbed “the freedom movement.” Post-debate polling showed he nearly won the second debate where Rudy Giuliani tried to rebuke Paul for his opposition to the Iraq war. His campaign clearly has had momentum ever since. He noted his position on Iraq hasn’t hurt him with those fighting the war in Iraq. He says his support from active duty soldiers outnumbers all the other candidates 3 to 1.

Crowd greets Ron Paul at the Alamo in San Antonio, TXMassive grassroots support for Ron Paul
The bulk of his support isn’t gauged by traditional campaign markers like BIG MONEY supporters, BIG endorsements and press coverage, but even Paul surprised the jaded political pundits when he turned up with more campaign cash on hand than top tier candidate John McCain (and that was before McCain’s steady decline). Paul’s massive group of un-paid, committed grassroots volunteers also indicate the strength of the “freedom movement.”

Many call Paul the “last hope” to preserve America, restore the Constitutional Republic (of, by, and for the PEOPLE), reclaim America’s financial independence, and protect her sovereignty.

Ron Paul surrounded by supportersInternet Sensation
No candidate has more support or buzz on the internet than Ron Paul. The only candidate to come close is Democratic Presidential Candidate Senator Barrack Obama who has 10,000 “meet-up” groups. Paul has a stunning 27,000! Dr. Paul noted he has seen a steady increase of young people coming into his office in Washington with their parents lauding Paul’s love for and vehement protection of the Constitution telling him they share his love for the Constitution and have contributed to their parents becoming Ron Paul supporters.

Republicans... wake up!There’s also a campaign afoot to wake-up the Republican Party to Ron Paul’s message at next month’s Texas Straw Poll. We’ll continue to watch the “Ron Paul Revolution.”

McNeil, who ousted toll critic for Chair of MPO, cozy with road builder, Zachry, since he gave $750,000 of projects to east side

Councilwoman Sheila McNeil marched into her first MPO Transportation Policy Board Meeting and demanded to be Chair. She exploited the City’s voting block (the City has two more appointees to the Board than the County) to oust her own County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson who was to succeed the City’s former Chair, Councilman Richard Perez. Read more about it here.

Follow the money…when a Zachry executive called McNeil’s district “the ghetto,” she managed to secure $750,000 in east side projects from Zachry as a reprisal. Now she’s rather cozy with the City’s most powerful business interest, Zachry, since she’s also taken campaign contributions from him. Considering his name was on the private bid to build San Antonio’s first toll projects, it explains her new-found pro-toll leanings rather nicely.

Link to the Express-News article on the $750,000 pay-off here.

Zachry trying to fix E. Side damage

Web Posted: 08/24/2005 12:00 AM CDT

Greg Jefferson
Express-News Staff Writer

Zachry Construction Corp. has agreed to give $750,000 to help lure jobs to the East Side, and to try to repair the firm’s reputation there several months after a company executive referred to the area as “the ghetto.”

District 2 Councilwoman Sheila McNeil pushed for the deal with Zachry, which is seeking $1 million in tax money for a planned hotel project near Sunset Station.

McNeil — who took office in June — said that without the agreement, the company’s bid for city assistance would not have her support.

“Based on what happened and the community’s reaction to it, I couldn’t,” she said. “This agreement helps me get behind the project and move it forward.”

Zachry, Sunset Station’s developer, agreed to contribute the money to the city for East Side economic development initiatives over three years.

McNeil “believed that we needed to demonstrate that we are committed to the East Side community, in addition to the investments we’ve made in the community over the years,” Zachry spokeswoman Vicky Waddy said.

The money, McNeil said, would flow to the East Side’s Community Economic Revitalization Agency, a nonprofit specializing in economic development that’s been criticized for producing few results.

McNeil is looking to retool CERA to draw development to areas that have seen precious little of it over the years. The $750,000 could propel that effort.

“That’s more than the operating budgets of most not-for-profits in town,” city Economic Development Director Ramiro Cavazos said.

Zachry originally sought $1.9 million from the Inner City Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone, which includes a broad slice of the East Side, for a planned Staybridge Suites hotel directly south of Sunset Station.

But TIRZ directors delayed a decision on the project after community activists railed against the company during a June 27 meeting.

They were angry about a Zachry employee’s now infamous e-mail during the mayoral runoff election between Phil Hardberger and Julián Castro.

Ken Wolf, then-vice president for Metropolitan Resources, a Zachry subsidiary, sent an e-mail in May urging friends and associates to support Hardberger.

In the message, he wrote that the SBC Center was built “in the ghetto” because of poor leadership in city government.

Wolf resigned from the company in June, and H.B. Zachry Jr., head of Zachry Construction, said in a letter to Castro he “regretted this incident.”

The TIRZ board revisited Zachry’s project Monday and agreed to advance it, along with six others, to the City Council for approval Thursday.

T.C. Calvert, president of the San Antonio Observer and an activist leader at the June 27 showdown, dismissed the deal with Zachry.

“This was an agreement that was worked out by the political people, by Sheila McNeil, and the community wasn’t involved,” said Calvert, who’s president of the Neighborhoods First Alliance. “To me, it’s like another slap in the face.”

McNeil, meanwhile, said an agreement spelling out terms of Zachry’s “partnership” must be finalized before the council takes up the company’s funding request; otherwise, it could be postponed. McNeil, a member of the TIRZ board, won support for the contingency Monday.

Zachry, which is planning a second development near Sunset Station, has a catch of its own.

“Our contributions are contingent on our projects going forward,” Waddy said.

As far as the hotel, that means tapping TIRZ dollars, as well as lining up private investors and working out a deal with a hotel operator.

Zachry Realty, a Zachry Construction subsidiary, is looking to develop the 13-story, 141-room hotel. Company officials say they need TIRZ funding to make the project attractive to investors, though they trimmed their request to $1 million. City staffers said the project was eligible for about $1.6 million.

The other $600,000 would go toward the creation of a “quiet zone” in the St. Paul Square/Sunset Square area, an initiative aimed at lessening noise from passing trains.

Zachry also plans to build condominiums in the area. The company wouldn’t seek TIRZ funding for the project, Waddy said, but it might apply for a property tax abatement.

She said Zachry’s contributions would go to the city, which is expected to direct the money to CERA, a recipient of city funding and federal Community Development Block Grants that fought for the creation of the Inner City TIRZ.

“We’re going to give it to the city and tell them we want it used for economic development on the East Side. How they use it is up to them,” Waddy said.

The pact, Cavazos said, sounded similar to Zachry’s agreement in 2001 to contribute $60,000 to an after-school program when it sought a controversial tax abatement for a new headquarters on the South Side.

According to McNeil, one of CERA’s first changes could be its name, to Center for Eastside Economic Development.

“That agency should be serving as a vehicle for economic development on the East Side,” McNeil said.

Leohardt's betrayal of Adkisson in full color on YouTube!

Windcrest Mayor Jack Leonhardt betrayed his own County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson (who endorsed Leonhardt) and the Council of Mayors who appointed him to the MPO in order to give the City of San Antonio a quid pro quo for his own self-interest. Read details here.

Watch his pontificating prior to the vote where he DIRECTLY tells the MPO Board to vote against Commissioner Adkisson (so much for being an un-biased parliamentarian who presided over the vote) so as not to label the Board “anti-toll” due to Adkisson’s criticism of toll plans in full color on YouTube here.

Never mind that the community IS against the proposed toll plans and Adkisson is merely trying to reflect what the community wants! He’s representing the taxpayers while Leonhardt carries the highway lobby’s water! Leonhardt even contradicts himself when, first, he says the Chair vote isn’t about toll vs. anti-toll, then later he says he doesn’t want the MPO to be labeled anti-toll if Adkisson were Chair. Nice try, Mayor, it was a pro-toll vs. anti-toll vote…you made that clear! I’m sure the citizens of Windcrest will be outraged to learn of their Mayor’s pro-toll antics since I-35, their main artery, is in the toll plans.

Hunter-Kaptur amendment to STOP funding of TTC overwhelmingly passes House

Late Thursday evening, on July 26, 2007, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Hunter-Kaptur amendment to the Transportation Appropriations Bill (HR 3074) by an overwhelming margin, 362-63. The amendment was introduced by Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (D-OH). In a total repudiation of NAFTA, our failed trade policies, and the Bush Administration’s unilateral and aggressive fast tracking of the NAFTA Superhighways, the House successfully moved to de-fund them. Now it heads to the Senate.

Read more about the amendment within this story where Vice President Dick Cheney denies the NAFTA Superhighways.

Cheney chimes in to deny NAFTA superhighways despite preponderance of evidence

Link to article here.

In one way, I agree with Cheney: there is no SECRET plan to construct NAFTA Superhighways (the first being the Trans Texas Corridor TTC-35). It’s being done in the WIDE OPEN for those who know where to look. However, it’s being done WITHOUT the approval of Congress and the American people and under the radar of the majority of the national press. The more they try to deny it, the more they heap coals of fire on their heads.

Now Cheney chimes in: Ain’t no superhighways
VP latest to make official denial, some call it ‘gaming semantics’
By Jerome R. Corsi
July 29, 2007
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


Vice President Cheney

Despite evidence to the contrary, Vice President Dick Cheney says there is no “secret plan” to create a continent-crossing superhighway to help facilitate a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada.

“The Administration is not engaged in a secret plan to create a ‘NAFTA super highway,'” asserts Cheney in a recent letter to a constituent, according to a copy of the message obtained by WND.

The vice president’s letter quotes an Aug. 21 statement from the U.S. Department of Transportation that, “The concept of a super highway has been around since the early 1990s, usually in the form of a claim that the U.S. Department of Transportation is going to designate such a highway.”

DOT then refutes the claim, stating, “The Department of Transportation has never had the statutory authority to designate a NAFTA super highway and has never sought such authority.”

The DOT statement then retracts the absolute nature of that statement, qualifying that, “The Department of Transportation will continue to cooperate with the State transportation departments in the I-35 corridor as they upgrade this vital interstate highway to meet 21st century needs. However, these efforts are the routine activities of a Department that cooperates with all the state transportation departments to improve the Nation’s intermodal transportation network.